Cargando…

Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramser, Michaela, Lobbes, Leonard A., Warschkow, Rene, Viehl, Carsten T., Lauscher, Johannes C., Droeser, Raoul A., Kettelhack, Christoph, Zuber, Markus, Weixler, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8
_version_ 1783663705903333376
author Ramser, Michaela
Lobbes, Leonard A.
Warschkow, Rene
Viehl, Carsten T.
Lauscher, Johannes C.
Droeser, Raoul A.
Kettelhack, Christoph
Zuber, Markus
Weixler, Benjamin
author_facet Ramser, Michaela
Lobbes, Leonard A.
Warschkow, Rene
Viehl, Carsten T.
Lauscher, Johannes C.
Droeser, Raoul A.
Kettelhack, Christoph
Zuber, Markus
Weixler, Benjamin
author_sort Ramser, Michaela
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much discussed. Guidelines request a minimum number of 12 LN to be analysed. Whether that threshold marks a prognostic relevant cut-off remains unknown. METHODS: Patients operated for stage I–III CRC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The impact of the number of analysed LN on OS, CSS and DFS was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Of the 687 patients, 81.8% had ≥ 12 LN resected and analysed. Median LN yield was 17.0 (IQR 13.0–23.0). Resection and analysis of ≥ 12 LN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.95, p = 0.033), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31–0.85, p = 0.030) and DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.95, p = 0.030) in multivariate Cox analysis. After adjusting for biasing factors with propensity score matching, resection of ≥ 12 LN was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43–0.81; p = 0.002), CSS (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.60; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41–0.74; p < 0.001) compared to patients with < 12 LN. CONCLUSION: Eliminating biasing factors by a propensity score matching analysis underlines the prognostic importance of the number of analysed LN. The set threshold marks the minimum number of required LN but nevertheless represents a cut-off regarding outcome in stage I–III CRC. This analysis therefore highlights the significance and importance of adherence to surgical oncological standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7952332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79523322021-03-28 Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis Ramser, Michaela Lobbes, Leonard A. Warschkow, Rene Viehl, Carsten T. Lauscher, Johannes C. Droeser, Raoul A. Kettelhack, Christoph Zuber, Markus Weixler, Benjamin Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much discussed. Guidelines request a minimum number of 12 LN to be analysed. Whether that threshold marks a prognostic relevant cut-off remains unknown. METHODS: Patients operated for stage I–III CRC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The impact of the number of analysed LN on OS, CSS and DFS was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Of the 687 patients, 81.8% had ≥ 12 LN resected and analysed. Median LN yield was 17.0 (IQR 13.0–23.0). Resection and analysis of ≥ 12 LN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.95, p = 0.033), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31–0.85, p = 0.030) and DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.95, p = 0.030) in multivariate Cox analysis. After adjusting for biasing factors with propensity score matching, resection of ≥ 12 LN was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43–0.81; p = 0.002), CSS (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.60; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41–0.74; p < 0.001) compared to patients with < 12 LN. CONCLUSION: Eliminating biasing factors by a propensity score matching analysis underlines the prognostic importance of the number of analysed LN. The set threshold marks the minimum number of required LN but nevertheless represents a cut-off regarding outcome in stage I–III CRC. This analysis therefore highlights the significance and importance of adherence to surgical oncological standards. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7952332/ /pubmed/33454816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramser, Michaela
Lobbes, Leonard A.
Warschkow, Rene
Viehl, Carsten T.
Lauscher, Johannes C.
Droeser, Raoul A.
Kettelhack, Christoph
Zuber, Markus
Weixler, Benjamin
Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
title Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
title_full Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
title_short Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
title_sort evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ramsermichaela evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT lobbesleonarda evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT warschkowrene evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT viehlcarstent evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT lauscherjohannesc evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT droeserraoula evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kettelhackchristoph evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT zubermarkus evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis
AT weixlerbenjamin evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis