Cargando…
Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis
PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much dis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8 |
_version_ | 1783663705903333376 |
---|---|
author | Ramser, Michaela Lobbes, Leonard A. Warschkow, Rene Viehl, Carsten T. Lauscher, Johannes C. Droeser, Raoul A. Kettelhack, Christoph Zuber, Markus Weixler, Benjamin |
author_facet | Ramser, Michaela Lobbes, Leonard A. Warschkow, Rene Viehl, Carsten T. Lauscher, Johannes C. Droeser, Raoul A. Kettelhack, Christoph Zuber, Markus Weixler, Benjamin |
author_sort | Ramser, Michaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much discussed. Guidelines request a minimum number of 12 LN to be analysed. Whether that threshold marks a prognostic relevant cut-off remains unknown. METHODS: Patients operated for stage I–III CRC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The impact of the number of analysed LN on OS, CSS and DFS was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Of the 687 patients, 81.8% had ≥ 12 LN resected and analysed. Median LN yield was 17.0 (IQR 13.0–23.0). Resection and analysis of ≥ 12 LN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.95, p = 0.033), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31–0.85, p = 0.030) and DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.95, p = 0.030) in multivariate Cox analysis. After adjusting for biasing factors with propensity score matching, resection of ≥ 12 LN was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43–0.81; p = 0.002), CSS (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.60; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41–0.74; p < 0.001) compared to patients with < 12 LN. CONCLUSION: Eliminating biasing factors by a propensity score matching analysis underlines the prognostic importance of the number of analysed LN. The set threshold marks the minimum number of required LN but nevertheless represents a cut-off regarding outcome in stage I–III CRC. This analysis therefore highlights the significance and importance of adherence to surgical oncological standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7952332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79523322021-03-28 Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis Ramser, Michaela Lobbes, Leonard A. Warschkow, Rene Viehl, Carsten T. Lauscher, Johannes C. Droeser, Raoul A. Kettelhack, Christoph Zuber, Markus Weixler, Benjamin Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much discussed. Guidelines request a minimum number of 12 LN to be analysed. Whether that threshold marks a prognostic relevant cut-off remains unknown. METHODS: Patients operated for stage I–III CRC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The impact of the number of analysed LN on OS, CSS and DFS was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Of the 687 patients, 81.8% had ≥ 12 LN resected and analysed. Median LN yield was 17.0 (IQR 13.0–23.0). Resection and analysis of ≥ 12 LN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.95, p = 0.033), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31–0.85, p = 0.030) and DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.95, p = 0.030) in multivariate Cox analysis. After adjusting for biasing factors with propensity score matching, resection of ≥ 12 LN was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43–0.81; p = 0.002), CSS (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.60; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41–0.74; p < 0.001) compared to patients with < 12 LN. CONCLUSION: Eliminating biasing factors by a propensity score matching analysis underlines the prognostic importance of the number of analysed LN. The set threshold marks the minimum number of required LN but nevertheless represents a cut-off regarding outcome in stage I–III CRC. This analysis therefore highlights the significance and importance of adherence to surgical oncological standards. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7952332/ /pubmed/33454816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ramser, Michaela Lobbes, Leonard A. Warschkow, Rene Viehl, Carsten T. Lauscher, Johannes C. Droeser, Raoul A. Kettelhack, Christoph Zuber, Markus Weixler, Benjamin Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
title | Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer—a propensity score analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramsermichaela evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT lobbesleonarda evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT warschkowrene evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT viehlcarstent evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT lauscherjohannesc evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT droeserraoula evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT kettelhackchristoph evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT zubermarkus evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis AT weixlerbenjamin evaluationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftherecommendedminimumnumberoflymphnodesincolorectalcancerapropensityscoreanalysis |