Cargando…

Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE: Although the EQ-5D has a long history of use in a wide range of populations, the newer five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) has not yet had such extensive experience. This systematic review summarizes the available published scientific evidence on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, You-Shan, Kohlmann, Thomas, Janssen, Mathieu F., Buchholz, Ines
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y
_version_ 1783663708936863744
author Feng, You-Shan
Kohlmann, Thomas
Janssen, Mathieu F.
Buchholz, Ines
author_facet Feng, You-Shan
Kohlmann, Thomas
Janssen, Mathieu F.
Buchholz, Ines
author_sort Feng, You-Shan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although the EQ-5D has a long history of use in a wide range of populations, the newer five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) has not yet had such extensive experience. This systematic review summarizes the available published scientific evidence on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: Pre-determined key words and exclusion criteria were used to systematically search publications from 2011 to 2019. Information on study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted: specifically, EQ-5D-5L distribution (including ceiling and floor), missing values, reliability (test–retest), validity (convergent, known-groups, discriminate) and responsiveness (distribution, anchor-based). EQ-5D-5L index value means, ceiling and correlation coefficients (convergent validity) were pooled across the studies using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of the 889 identified publications, 99 were included for review, representing 32 countries. Musculoskeletal/orthopedic problems and cancer (n = 8 each) were most often studied. Most papers found missing values (17 of 17 papers) and floor effects (43 of 48 papers) to be unproblematic. While the index was found to be reliable (9 of 9 papers), individual dimensions exhibited instability over time. Index values and dimensions demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with global health measures, other multi-attribute utility instruments, physical/functional health, pain, activities of daily living, and clinical/biological measures. The instrument was not correlated with life satisfaction and cognition/communication measures. Responsiveness was addressed by 15 studies, finding moderate effect sizes when confined to studied subgroups with improvements in health. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L exhibits excellent psychometric properties across a broad range of populations, conditions and settings. Rigorous exploration of its responsiveness is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7952346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79523462021-03-28 Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature Feng, You-Shan Kohlmann, Thomas Janssen, Mathieu F. Buchholz, Ines Qual Life Res Review PURPOSE: Although the EQ-5D has a long history of use in a wide range of populations, the newer five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) has not yet had such extensive experience. This systematic review summarizes the available published scientific evidence on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: Pre-determined key words and exclusion criteria were used to systematically search publications from 2011 to 2019. Information on study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted: specifically, EQ-5D-5L distribution (including ceiling and floor), missing values, reliability (test–retest), validity (convergent, known-groups, discriminate) and responsiveness (distribution, anchor-based). EQ-5D-5L index value means, ceiling and correlation coefficients (convergent validity) were pooled across the studies using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of the 889 identified publications, 99 were included for review, representing 32 countries. Musculoskeletal/orthopedic problems and cancer (n = 8 each) were most often studied. Most papers found missing values (17 of 17 papers) and floor effects (43 of 48 papers) to be unproblematic. While the index was found to be reliable (9 of 9 papers), individual dimensions exhibited instability over time. Index values and dimensions demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with global health measures, other multi-attribute utility instruments, physical/functional health, pain, activities of daily living, and clinical/biological measures. The instrument was not correlated with life satisfaction and cognition/communication measures. Responsiveness was addressed by 15 studies, finding moderate effect sizes when confined to studied subgroups with improvements in health. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L exhibits excellent psychometric properties across a broad range of populations, conditions and settings. Rigorous exploration of its responsiveness is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7952346/ /pubmed/33284428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Feng, You-Shan
Kohlmann, Thomas
Janssen, Mathieu F.
Buchholz, Ines
Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature
title Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort psychometric properties of the eq-5d-5l: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fengyoushan psychometricpropertiesoftheeq5d5lasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kohlmannthomas psychometricpropertiesoftheeq5d5lasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT janssenmathieuf psychometricpropertiesoftheeq5d5lasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT buchholzines psychometricpropertiesoftheeq5d5lasystematicreviewoftheliterature