Cargando…

A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills

INTRODUCTION: Australian Standards require that clinicians undergo regular training in skills required to respond to the acute deterioration of a patient. Training focuses on the ability to appropriately respond to cardiac arrest, including delivering cardiac compressions, ventilation and appropriat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Chris, Furness, Erin, Proctor, Leah, Sweetman, Greg, Hird, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00631-y
_version_ 1783663737506365440
author Wilson, Chris
Furness, Erin
Proctor, Leah
Sweetman, Greg
Hird, Kathryn
author_facet Wilson, Chris
Furness, Erin
Proctor, Leah
Sweetman, Greg
Hird, Kathryn
author_sort Wilson, Chris
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Australian Standards require that clinicians undergo regular training in skills required to respond to the acute deterioration of a patient. Training focuses on the ability to appropriately respond to cardiac arrest, including delivering cardiac compressions, ventilation and appropriate defibrillation. Providing such training comes at a significant cost to the organisation and impacts on clinician time in direct patient care. If effective, the use of an automated manikin could significantly reduce costs and provide consistent training experiences. METHODS: Fifty-six resident medical officers were randomised to two groups to test two skills components of hospital life support training under two feedback conditions. The skills components were cardiac compressions and bag-valve-mask ventilation. The feedback conditions were automated feedback delivered by a simulation manikin and traditional feedback delivered by an instructor. All participants were exposed to both skills components and both feedback conditions in a counterbalanced block design. Participants completed surveys before and after training. RESULTS: The results demonstrated significantly better performance in cardiac compressions under the automated manikin feedback condition compared with the instructor feedback condition. This difference was not observed in bag-valve-mask ventilation. The majority of participants found the automated manikin feedback more useful than the instructor feedback. DISCUSSION: Automated manikin feedback was not inferior to instructor feedback for skill acquisition in cardiac compressions training. The automated feedback condition did not achieve the same level of significance in bag-valve-mask ventilation training. Results suggest training with automated feedback presents a cost-effective opportunity to lessen the training burden, whilst improving skill acquisition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00631-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7952489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79524892021-03-28 A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills Wilson, Chris Furness, Erin Proctor, Leah Sweetman, Greg Hird, Kathryn Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: Australian Standards require that clinicians undergo regular training in skills required to respond to the acute deterioration of a patient. Training focuses on the ability to appropriately respond to cardiac arrest, including delivering cardiac compressions, ventilation and appropriate defibrillation. Providing such training comes at a significant cost to the organisation and impacts on clinician time in direct patient care. If effective, the use of an automated manikin could significantly reduce costs and provide consistent training experiences. METHODS: Fifty-six resident medical officers were randomised to two groups to test two skills components of hospital life support training under two feedback conditions. The skills components were cardiac compressions and bag-valve-mask ventilation. The feedback conditions were automated feedback delivered by a simulation manikin and traditional feedback delivered by an instructor. All participants were exposed to both skills components and both feedback conditions in a counterbalanced block design. Participants completed surveys before and after training. RESULTS: The results demonstrated significantly better performance in cardiac compressions under the automated manikin feedback condition compared with the instructor feedback condition. This difference was not observed in bag-valve-mask ventilation. The majority of participants found the automated manikin feedback more useful than the instructor feedback. DISCUSSION: Automated manikin feedback was not inferior to instructor feedback for skill acquisition in cardiac compressions training. The automated feedback condition did not achieve the same level of significance in bag-valve-mask ventilation training. Results suggest training with automated feedback presents a cost-effective opportunity to lessen the training burden, whilst improving skill acquisition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00631-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-11-26 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7952489/ /pubmed/33242153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00631-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wilson, Chris
Furness, Erin
Proctor, Leah
Sweetman, Greg
Hird, Kathryn
A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
title A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
title_full A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
title_fullStr A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
title_full_unstemmed A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
title_short A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
title_sort a randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00631-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonchris arandomisedtrialoftheeffectivenessofinstructorversusautomatedmanikinfeedbackfortrainingjuniordoctorsinlifesupportskills
AT furnesserin arandomisedtrialoftheeffectivenessofinstructorversusautomatedmanikinfeedbackfortrainingjuniordoctorsinlifesupportskills
AT proctorleah arandomisedtrialoftheeffectivenessofinstructorversusautomatedmanikinfeedbackfortrainingjuniordoctorsinlifesupportskills
AT sweetmangreg arandomisedtrialoftheeffectivenessofinstructorversusautomatedmanikinfeedbackfortrainingjuniordoctorsinlifesupportskills
AT hirdkathryn arandomisedtrialoftheeffectivenessofinstructorversusautomatedmanikinfeedbackfortrainingjuniordoctorsinlifesupportskills