Cargando…
Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis
In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85118-4 |
_version_ | 1783663794575114240 |
---|---|
author | Hirose, Ryohei Yoshida, Takuma Naito, Yuji Watanabe, Naoto Hashimoto, Hikaru Sugino, Satoshi Bandou, Risa Daidoji, Tomo Inoue, Ken Dohi, Osamu Yoshida, Naohisa Nakaya, Takaaki Itoh, Yoshito |
author_facet | Hirose, Ryohei Yoshida, Takuma Naito, Yuji Watanabe, Naoto Hashimoto, Hikaru Sugino, Satoshi Bandou, Risa Daidoji, Tomo Inoue, Ken Dohi, Osamu Yoshida, Naohisa Nakaya, Takaaki Itoh, Yoshito |
author_sort | Hirose, Ryohei |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nevertheless, visual observation conveys the impression that HA-Ks have a higher viscosity than HA-Mc, suggesting that HA-Ks performs better than HA-Mc. This study aimed to examine the differences between HA-Mc and HA-Ks. HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity due to greater weight-average molecular weight compared with HA-Mc. HA-Ks had significantly greater submucosal elevation height (SEH) than HA-Mc; the SEH of HA-Ks-80% (80% dilution of HA-Ks) was the same as that of HA-Mc. The ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with HA-Ks than with HA-Mc (15.2 ± 4.1 vs. 19.5 ± 5.9; P = 0.049). The total injection volume for HA-Ks was significantly lower than that for HA-Mc (10.8 ± 3.6 vs. 14.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.045). However, no significant difference in these items was observed between HA-Mc and HA-Ks-80%. HA-Mc and HA-Ks were considered to be almost the same. Nonetheless, HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity and SIM performance than HA-Mc. HA-Ks-80% had almost the same performance as HA-Mc. Thus, understanding SIM performance and characteristics requires a focus on the viscosity of SIMs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7952736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79527362021-03-15 Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis Hirose, Ryohei Yoshida, Takuma Naito, Yuji Watanabe, Naoto Hashimoto, Hikaru Sugino, Satoshi Bandou, Risa Daidoji, Tomo Inoue, Ken Dohi, Osamu Yoshida, Naohisa Nakaya, Takaaki Itoh, Yoshito Sci Rep Article In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nevertheless, visual observation conveys the impression that HA-Ks have a higher viscosity than HA-Mc, suggesting that HA-Ks performs better than HA-Mc. This study aimed to examine the differences between HA-Mc and HA-Ks. HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity due to greater weight-average molecular weight compared with HA-Mc. HA-Ks had significantly greater submucosal elevation height (SEH) than HA-Mc; the SEH of HA-Ks-80% (80% dilution of HA-Ks) was the same as that of HA-Mc. The ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with HA-Ks than with HA-Mc (15.2 ± 4.1 vs. 19.5 ± 5.9; P = 0.049). The total injection volume for HA-Ks was significantly lower than that for HA-Mc (10.8 ± 3.6 vs. 14.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.045). However, no significant difference in these items was observed between HA-Mc and HA-Ks-80%. HA-Mc and HA-Ks were considered to be almost the same. Nonetheless, HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity and SIM performance than HA-Mc. HA-Ks-80% had almost the same performance as HA-Mc. Thus, understanding SIM performance and characteristics requires a focus on the viscosity of SIMs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7952736/ /pubmed/33707637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85118-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hirose, Ryohei Yoshida, Takuma Naito, Yuji Watanabe, Naoto Hashimoto, Hikaru Sugino, Satoshi Bandou, Risa Daidoji, Tomo Inoue, Ken Dohi, Osamu Yoshida, Naohisa Nakaya, Takaaki Itoh, Yoshito Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title | Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_full | Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_fullStr | Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_short | Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_sort | differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in japan based on viscosity analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85118-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiroseryohei differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT yoshidatakuma differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT naitoyuji differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT watanabenaoto differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT hashimotohikaru differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT suginosatoshi differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT bandourisa differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT daidojitomo differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT inoueken differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT dohiosamu differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT yoshidanaohisa differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT nakayatakaaki differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT itohyoshito differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis |