Cargando…
Patient prognostic scores and association with survival improvement offered by postoperative radiotherapy for resected IIIA/N2 non‐small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on the role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) for resected stage IIIA/N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study sought to determine which patients may be able to benefit from PORT, based on a patient prognostic score. METHODS: A retrosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13835 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on the role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) for resected stage IIIA/N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study sought to determine which patients may be able to benefit from PORT, based on a patient prognostic score. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 1988 and 2016 in the SEER database. Eligible patients were divided into the following two groups: PORT group and non‐PORT group. We classified patient prognostic scores as an ordinal factor and stratified patients based on prognostic scores. A Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score weighting was performed to evaluate cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) between the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 7060 eligible patients with IIIA/N2 NSCLC, 2833 (40.1%) in the PORT group and 4227 (59.9%) in the non‐PORT group. Overall, the 10‐year CSM rate in the weighted cohorts was 70.4% in the PORT group, 72.0% in the non‐PORT group, and patients who received PORT had a lower CSM rate (p = 0.001). Compared with the non‐PORT group, significant survival improvements in the PORT group were observed in patients with higher age, grade, T stage and lymph node ratio (LNR), and without chemotherapy. The improved survival of patients receiving PORT was significantly correlated with patient prognostic scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our population‐based study, the prognostic score was associated with the survival improvement offered by PORT in IIIA/N2 NSCLC, suggesting that prognostic scores and clinicopathological characteristics may be helpful in proper candidate selection for PORT. |
---|