Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis, although ESD is challenging, even for small lesions, in the greater curvature (GC) of the upper (U) and middle (M) thirds of the stomach. Grasping forceps-assisted endo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738045 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i3.174 |
_version_ | 1783663896750456832 |
---|---|
author | Ichijima, Ryoji Suzuki, Sho Esaki, Mitsuru Horii, Toshiki Kusano, Chika Ikehara, Hisatomo Gotoda, Takuji |
author_facet | Ichijima, Ryoji Suzuki, Sho Esaki, Mitsuru Horii, Toshiki Kusano, Chika Ikehara, Hisatomo Gotoda, Takuji |
author_sort | Ichijima, Ryoji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis, although ESD is challenging, even for small lesions, in the greater curvature (GC) of the upper (U) and middle (M) thirds of the stomach. Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection (GF-ER) is a type of endoscopic mucosal resection that is performed via a double-channel endoscope. AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of GF-ER vs ESD in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 506 patients who underwent ER of 522 EGC lesions in the stomach’s U and M regions in three institutions between January 2016 and May 2020. Nine lesions from eight patients who underwent GF-ER for EGC (the GF-ER group) were compared to 63 lesions from 63 patients who underwent ESD (the ESD group). We also performed a subgroup analysis of small lesions (≤ 10 mm) in 6 patients (7 lesions) from the GF-ER group and 20 patients (20 lesions) from the ESD group. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the GF-ER and ESD groups in the en bloc resection rates (100% vs 100%) and the R0 resection rates (100% vs 98.4%). The median procedure time in the GF-ER group was shorter than that in the ESD group (4.0 min vs 55.0 min, P < 0.01). There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group, although five perforations (8.0%) and 1 case of postoperative bleeding (1.6%) were observed in the ESD group. When we only considered lesions that were ≤ 10 mm, the median procedure time in the GF-ER group was still shorter than that in the ESD group (4.0 min vs 35.0 min, P < 0.01). There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group, although 1 case of perforation (1.6%) were observed in the ESD group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that GF-ER may be an effective therapeutic option for small lesions in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7953346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79533462021-03-17 Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study Ichijima, Ryoji Suzuki, Sho Esaki, Mitsuru Horii, Toshiki Kusano, Chika Ikehara, Hisatomo Gotoda, Takuji World J Gastrointest Oncol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis, although ESD is challenging, even for small lesions, in the greater curvature (GC) of the upper (U) and middle (M) thirds of the stomach. Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection (GF-ER) is a type of endoscopic mucosal resection that is performed via a double-channel endoscope. AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of GF-ER vs ESD in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 506 patients who underwent ER of 522 EGC lesions in the stomach’s U and M regions in three institutions between January 2016 and May 2020. Nine lesions from eight patients who underwent GF-ER for EGC (the GF-ER group) were compared to 63 lesions from 63 patients who underwent ESD (the ESD group). We also performed a subgroup analysis of small lesions (≤ 10 mm) in 6 patients (7 lesions) from the GF-ER group and 20 patients (20 lesions) from the ESD group. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the GF-ER and ESD groups in the en bloc resection rates (100% vs 100%) and the R0 resection rates (100% vs 98.4%). The median procedure time in the GF-ER group was shorter than that in the ESD group (4.0 min vs 55.0 min, P < 0.01). There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group, although five perforations (8.0%) and 1 case of postoperative bleeding (1.6%) were observed in the ESD group. When we only considered lesions that were ≤ 10 mm, the median procedure time in the GF-ER group was still shorter than that in the ESD group (4.0 min vs 35.0 min, P < 0.01). There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group, although 1 case of perforation (1.6%) were observed in the ESD group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that GF-ER may be an effective therapeutic option for small lesions in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-03-15 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7953346/ /pubmed/33738045 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i3.174 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Ichijima, Ryoji Suzuki, Sho Esaki, Mitsuru Horii, Toshiki Kusano, Chika Ikehara, Hisatomo Gotoda, Takuji Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study |
title | Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: a multi-centre retrospective study |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738045 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i3.174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ichijimaryoji efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT suzukisho efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT esakimitsuru efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT horiitoshiki efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT kusanochika efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT ikeharahisatomo efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT gotodatakuji efficacyandsafetyofgraspingforcepsassistedendoscopicresectionforgastricneoplasmsamulticentreretrospectivestudy |