Cargando…

COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020

INTRODUCTION: The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) managed the exchange of cross-border contact tracing data between public health authorities (PHA) in Germany and abroad during the early COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: We describe the extent of cross-border contact tracing and its challenges. METHODS: We analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markus, Inessa, Steffen, Gyde, Lachmann, Raskit, Marquis, Adine, Schneider, Timm, Tomczyk, Sara, Koppe, Uwe, Rohde, Anna M, Schink, Susanne Barbara, Seifried, Janna, Domaszewska, Teresa, Rexroth, Ute, an der Heiden, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706859
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.10.2001236
_version_ 1783663936993755136
author Markus, Inessa
Steffen, Gyde
Lachmann, Raskit
Marquis, Adine
Schneider, Timm
Tomczyk, Sara
Koppe, Uwe
Rohde, Anna M
Schink, Susanne Barbara
Seifried, Janna
Domaszewska, Teresa
Rexroth, Ute
an der Heiden, Maria
author_facet Markus, Inessa
Steffen, Gyde
Lachmann, Raskit
Marquis, Adine
Schneider, Timm
Tomczyk, Sara
Koppe, Uwe
Rohde, Anna M
Schink, Susanne Barbara
Seifried, Janna
Domaszewska, Teresa
Rexroth, Ute
an der Heiden, Maria
author_sort Markus, Inessa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) managed the exchange of cross-border contact tracing data between public health authorities (PHA) in Germany and abroad during the early COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: We describe the extent of cross-border contact tracing and its challenges. METHODS: We analysed cross-border COVID-19 contact tracing events from 3 February to 5 April 2020 using information exchanged through the European Early Warning Response System and communication with International Health Regulation national focal points. We described events by PHA, number of contacts and exposure context. RESULTS: The RKI processed 467 events, initiating contact to PHA 1,099 times (median = 1; interquartile range (IQR): 1–2) and sharing data on 5,099 contact persons. Of 327 (70%) events with known exposure context, the most commonly reported exposures were aircraft (n = 64; 20%), cruise ships (n = 24; 7%) and non-transport contexts (n = 210; 64%). Cruise ship and aircraft exposures generated more contacts with authorities (median = 10; IQR: 2–16, median = 4; IQR: 2–11) and more contact persons (median = 60; IQR: 9–269, median = 2; IQR: 1–3) than non-transport exposures (median = 1; IQR: 1–6 and median = 1; IQR: 1–2). The median time spent on contact tracing was highest for cruise ships: 5 days (IQR: 3–9). CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 pandemic, cross-border contact tracing is considered a critical component of the outbreak response. While only a minority of international contact tracing activities were related to exposure events in transport, they contributed substantially to the workload. The numerous communications highlight the need for fast and efficient global outbreak communication channels between PHA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7953533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79535332021-03-18 COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020 Markus, Inessa Steffen, Gyde Lachmann, Raskit Marquis, Adine Schneider, Timm Tomczyk, Sara Koppe, Uwe Rohde, Anna M Schink, Susanne Barbara Seifried, Janna Domaszewska, Teresa Rexroth, Ute an der Heiden, Maria Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) managed the exchange of cross-border contact tracing data between public health authorities (PHA) in Germany and abroad during the early COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: We describe the extent of cross-border contact tracing and its challenges. METHODS: We analysed cross-border COVID-19 contact tracing events from 3 February to 5 April 2020 using information exchanged through the European Early Warning Response System and communication with International Health Regulation national focal points. We described events by PHA, number of contacts and exposure context. RESULTS: The RKI processed 467 events, initiating contact to PHA 1,099 times (median = 1; interquartile range (IQR): 1–2) and sharing data on 5,099 contact persons. Of 327 (70%) events with known exposure context, the most commonly reported exposures were aircraft (n = 64; 20%), cruise ships (n = 24; 7%) and non-transport contexts (n = 210; 64%). Cruise ship and aircraft exposures generated more contacts with authorities (median = 10; IQR: 2–16, median = 4; IQR: 2–11) and more contact persons (median = 60; IQR: 9–269, median = 2; IQR: 1–3) than non-transport exposures (median = 1; IQR: 1–6 and median = 1; IQR: 1–2). The median time spent on contact tracing was highest for cruise ships: 5 days (IQR: 3–9). CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 pandemic, cross-border contact tracing is considered a critical component of the outbreak response. While only a minority of international contact tracing activities were related to exposure events in transport, they contributed substantially to the workload. The numerous communications highlight the need for fast and efficient global outbreak communication channels between PHA. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7953533/ /pubmed/33706859 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.10.2001236 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2021. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Markus, Inessa
Steffen, Gyde
Lachmann, Raskit
Marquis, Adine
Schneider, Timm
Tomczyk, Sara
Koppe, Uwe
Rohde, Anna M
Schink, Susanne Barbara
Seifried, Janna
Domaszewska, Teresa
Rexroth, Ute
an der Heiden, Maria
COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
title COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
title_full COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
title_fullStr COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
title_short COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
title_sort covid-19: cross-border contact tracing in germany, february to april 2020
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706859
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.10.2001236
work_keys_str_mv AT markusinessa covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT steffengyde covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT lachmannraskit covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT marquisadine covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT schneidertimm covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT tomczyksara covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT koppeuwe covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT rohdeannam covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT schinksusannebarbara covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT seifriedjanna covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT domaszewskateresa covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT rexrothute covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020
AT anderheidenmaria covid19crossbordercontacttracingingermanyfebruarytoapril2020