Cargando…
Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review
BACKGROUND: Genomic research on neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), particularly involving minors, combines and amplifies existing research ethics issues for biomedical research. We performed a review of the literature on the ethical issues associated with genomic research involving children affect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4 |
_version_ | 1783663942072008704 |
---|---|
author | Mezinska, S. Gallagher, L. Verbrugge, M. Bunnik, E.M. |
author_facet | Mezinska, S. Gallagher, L. Verbrugge, M. Bunnik, E.M. |
author_sort | Mezinska, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic research on neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), particularly involving minors, combines and amplifies existing research ethics issues for biomedical research. We performed a review of the literature on the ethical issues associated with genomic research involving children affected by NDDs as an aid to researchers to better anticipate and address ethical concerns. RESULTS: Qualitative thematic analysis of the included articles revealed themes in three main areas: research design and ethics review, inclusion of research participants, and communication of research results. Ethical issues known to be associated with genomic research in general, such as privacy risks and informed consent/assent, seem especially pressing for NDD participants because of their potentially decreased cognitive abilities, increased vulnerability, and stigma associated with mental health problems. Additionally, there are informational risks: learning genetic information about NDD may have psychological and social impact, not only for the research participant but also for family members. However, there are potential benefits associated with research participation, too: by enrolling in research, the participants may access genetic testing and thus increase their chances of receiving a (genetic) diagnosis for their neurodevelopmental symptoms, prognostic or predictive information about disease progression or the risk of concurrent future disorders. Based on the results of our review, we developed an ethics checklist for genomic research involving children affected by NDDs. CONCLUSIONS: In setting up and designing genomic research efforts in NDD, researchers should partner with communities of persons with NDDs. Particular attention should be paid to preventing disproportional burdens of research participation of children with NDDs and their siblings, parents and other family members. Researchers should carefully tailor the information and informed consent procedures to avoid therapeutic and diagnostic misconception in NDD research. To better anticipate and address ethical issues in specific NDD studies, we suggest researchers to use the ethics checklist for genomic research involving children affected by NDDs presented in this paper. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7953558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79535582021-03-12 Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review Mezinska, S. Gallagher, L. Verbrugge, M. Bunnik, E.M. Hum Genomics Review BACKGROUND: Genomic research on neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), particularly involving minors, combines and amplifies existing research ethics issues for biomedical research. We performed a review of the literature on the ethical issues associated with genomic research involving children affected by NDDs as an aid to researchers to better anticipate and address ethical concerns. RESULTS: Qualitative thematic analysis of the included articles revealed themes in three main areas: research design and ethics review, inclusion of research participants, and communication of research results. Ethical issues known to be associated with genomic research in general, such as privacy risks and informed consent/assent, seem especially pressing for NDD participants because of their potentially decreased cognitive abilities, increased vulnerability, and stigma associated with mental health problems. Additionally, there are informational risks: learning genetic information about NDD may have psychological and social impact, not only for the research participant but also for family members. However, there are potential benefits associated with research participation, too: by enrolling in research, the participants may access genetic testing and thus increase their chances of receiving a (genetic) diagnosis for their neurodevelopmental symptoms, prognostic or predictive information about disease progression or the risk of concurrent future disorders. Based on the results of our review, we developed an ethics checklist for genomic research involving children affected by NDDs. CONCLUSIONS: In setting up and designing genomic research efforts in NDD, researchers should partner with communities of persons with NDDs. Particular attention should be paid to preventing disproportional burdens of research participation of children with NDDs and their siblings, parents and other family members. Researchers should carefully tailor the information and informed consent procedures to avoid therapeutic and diagnostic misconception in NDD research. To better anticipate and address ethical issues in specific NDD studies, we suggest researchers to use the ethics checklist for genomic research involving children affected by NDDs presented in this paper. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4. BioMed Central 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7953558/ /pubmed/33712057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Mezinska, S. Gallagher, L. Verbrugge, M. Bunnik, E.M. Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
title | Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
title_full | Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
title_fullStr | Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
title_short | Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
title_sort | ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mezinskas ethicalissuesingenomicsresearchonneurodevelopmentaldisordersacriticalinterpretivereview AT gallagherl ethicalissuesingenomicsresearchonneurodevelopmentaldisordersacriticalinterpretivereview AT verbruggem ethicalissuesingenomicsresearchonneurodevelopmentaldisordersacriticalinterpretivereview AT bunnikem ethicalissuesingenomicsresearchonneurodevelopmentaldisordersacriticalinterpretivereview |