Cargando…

Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses

Cefazolin is commonly used as an alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) in treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections; however, no study has compared these agents in MSSA spinal epidural abscess (SEA). We describe our experience in managing MSSA SEA and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corsini Campioli, Cristina, Go, John Raymond, Abu Saleh, Omar, Challener, Douglas, Yetmar, Zachary, Osmon, Douglas R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab071
_version_ 1783663957730394112
author Corsini Campioli, Cristina
Go, John Raymond
Abu Saleh, Omar
Challener, Douglas
Yetmar, Zachary
Osmon, Douglas R
author_facet Corsini Campioli, Cristina
Go, John Raymond
Abu Saleh, Omar
Challener, Douglas
Yetmar, Zachary
Osmon, Douglas R
author_sort Corsini Campioli, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Cefazolin is commonly used as an alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) in treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections; however, no study has compared these agents in MSSA spinal epidural abscess (SEA). We describe our experience in managing MSSA SEA and compare the clinical efficacy of cefazolin with ASPs. This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 79 adult patients diagnosed with SEA between January 2006 and July 2020 using data collected from electronic health records and clinical microbiology laboratory databases. Forty-five patients received cefazolin, while 34 received ASPs. The total antibiotic duration was longer in the ASPs group but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in treatment failure at week 6 vs week 12, 30-day vs overall mortality, or in 90-day recurrence rates between the treatment groups. Cefazolin was equally as effective as ASPs, and our findings suggest that it can be an alternative to ASPs in the treatment of MSSA SEA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7953649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79536492021-03-17 Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses Corsini Campioli, Cristina Go, John Raymond Abu Saleh, Omar Challener, Douglas Yetmar, Zachary Osmon, Douglas R Open Forum Infect Dis Review Articles Cefazolin is commonly used as an alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) in treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections; however, no study has compared these agents in MSSA spinal epidural abscess (SEA). We describe our experience in managing MSSA SEA and compare the clinical efficacy of cefazolin with ASPs. This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 79 adult patients diagnosed with SEA between January 2006 and July 2020 using data collected from electronic health records and clinical microbiology laboratory databases. Forty-five patients received cefazolin, while 34 received ASPs. The total antibiotic duration was longer in the ASPs group but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in treatment failure at week 6 vs week 12, 30-day vs overall mortality, or in 90-day recurrence rates between the treatment groups. Cefazolin was equally as effective as ASPs, and our findings suggest that it can be an alternative to ASPs in the treatment of MSSA SEA. Oxford University Press 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7953649/ /pubmed/33738321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab071 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review Articles
Corsini Campioli, Cristina
Go, John Raymond
Abu Saleh, Omar
Challener, Douglas
Yetmar, Zachary
Osmon, Douglas R
Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
title Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
title_full Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
title_fullStr Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
title_full_unstemmed Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
title_short Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
title_sort antistaphylococcal penicillin vs cefazolin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus spinal epidural abscesses
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab071
work_keys_str_mv AT corsinicampiolicristina antistaphylococcalpenicillinvscefazolinforthetreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusspinalepiduralabscesses
AT gojohnraymond antistaphylococcalpenicillinvscefazolinforthetreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusspinalepiduralabscesses
AT abusalehomar antistaphylococcalpenicillinvscefazolinforthetreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusspinalepiduralabscesses
AT challenerdouglas antistaphylococcalpenicillinvscefazolinforthetreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusspinalepiduralabscesses
AT yetmarzachary antistaphylococcalpenicillinvscefazolinforthetreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusspinalepiduralabscesses
AT osmondouglasr antistaphylococcalpenicillinvscefazolinforthetreatmentofmethicillinsusceptiblestaphylococcusaureusspinalepiduralabscesses