Cargando…
Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
BACKGROUND: Spinal stabilisation is recommended for prehospital trauma treatment. In Germany, vacuum mattresses are traditionally used for spinal stabilisation, whereas in anglo-american countries, long spine boards are preferred. While it is recommended that the on-scene time is as short as possibl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00854-w |
_version_ | 1783663980321964032 |
---|---|
author | MS, Roessler Riffelmann, M Kunze-Szikszay, N Lier, M Schmid, O Haus, H Schneider, S JF, Heuer |
author_facet | MS, Roessler Riffelmann, M Kunze-Szikszay, N Lier, M Schmid, O Haus, H Schneider, S JF, Heuer |
author_sort | MS, Roessler |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spinal stabilisation is recommended for prehospital trauma treatment. In Germany, vacuum mattresses are traditionally used for spinal stabilisation, whereas in anglo-american countries, long spine boards are preferred. While it is recommended that the on-scene time is as short as possible, even less than 10 minutes for unstable patients, spinal stabilisation is a time-consuming procedure. For this reason, the time needed for spinal stabilisation may prevent the on-scene time from being brief. The aim of this simulation study was to compare the time required for spinal stabilisation between a scoop stretcher in conjunction with a vacuum mattress and a long spine board. METHODS: Medical personnel of different professions were asked to perform spinal immobilizations with both methods. A total of 172 volunteers were immobilized under ideal conditions as well as under realistic conditions. A vacuum mattress was used for 78 spinal stabilisations, and a long spinal board was used for 94. The duration of the procedures were measured by video analysis. RESULTS: Under ideal conditions, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress and a spine board required 254.4 s (95 % CI 235.6–273.2 s) and 83.4 s (95 % CI 77.5–89.3 s), respectively (p < 0.01). Under realistic conditions, the vacuum mattress and spine board required 358.3 s (95 % CI 316.0–400.6 s) and 112.6 s (95 % CI 102.6–122.6 s), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal stabilisation for trauma patients is significantly more time consuming on a vacuum mattress than on a long spine board. Considering that the prehospital time of EMS should not exceed 60 minutes and the on-scene time should not exceed 30 minutes or even 10 minutes if the patient is in extremis, based on our results, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress may consume more than 20 % of the recommended on-scene time. In contrast, stabilisation on a spine board requires only one third of the time required for that on a vacuum mattress. We conclude that a long spine board may be feasible for spinal stabilisation for critical trauma patients with timesensitive life threatening ABCDE-problems to ensure the shortest possible on-scene time for prehospital trauma treatment, not least if a patient has to be rescued from an open or inaccessible terrain, especially that with uneven overgrown land. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7953765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79537652021-03-15 Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study MS, Roessler Riffelmann, M Kunze-Szikszay, N Lier, M Schmid, O Haus, H Schneider, S JF, Heuer Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Spinal stabilisation is recommended for prehospital trauma treatment. In Germany, vacuum mattresses are traditionally used for spinal stabilisation, whereas in anglo-american countries, long spine boards are preferred. While it is recommended that the on-scene time is as short as possible, even less than 10 minutes for unstable patients, spinal stabilisation is a time-consuming procedure. For this reason, the time needed for spinal stabilisation may prevent the on-scene time from being brief. The aim of this simulation study was to compare the time required for spinal stabilisation between a scoop stretcher in conjunction with a vacuum mattress and a long spine board. METHODS: Medical personnel of different professions were asked to perform spinal immobilizations with both methods. A total of 172 volunteers were immobilized under ideal conditions as well as under realistic conditions. A vacuum mattress was used for 78 spinal stabilisations, and a long spinal board was used for 94. The duration of the procedures were measured by video analysis. RESULTS: Under ideal conditions, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress and a spine board required 254.4 s (95 % CI 235.6–273.2 s) and 83.4 s (95 % CI 77.5–89.3 s), respectively (p < 0.01). Under realistic conditions, the vacuum mattress and spine board required 358.3 s (95 % CI 316.0–400.6 s) and 112.6 s (95 % CI 102.6–122.6 s), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal stabilisation for trauma patients is significantly more time consuming on a vacuum mattress than on a long spine board. Considering that the prehospital time of EMS should not exceed 60 minutes and the on-scene time should not exceed 30 minutes or even 10 minutes if the patient is in extremis, based on our results, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress may consume more than 20 % of the recommended on-scene time. In contrast, stabilisation on a spine board requires only one third of the time required for that on a vacuum mattress. We conclude that a long spine board may be feasible for spinal stabilisation for critical trauma patients with timesensitive life threatening ABCDE-problems to ensure the shortest possible on-scene time for prehospital trauma treatment, not least if a patient has to be rescued from an open or inaccessible terrain, especially that with uneven overgrown land. BioMed Central 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7953765/ /pubmed/33706791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00854-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research MS, Roessler Riffelmann, M Kunze-Szikszay, N Lier, M Schmid, O Haus, H Schneider, S JF, Heuer Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study |
title | Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study |
title_full | Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study |
title_fullStr | Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study |
title_short | Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study |
title_sort | vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? a simulation study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00854-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT msroessler vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT riffelmannm vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT kunzeszikszayn vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT lierm vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT schmido vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT haush vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT schneiders vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy AT jfheuer vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy |