Cargando…

Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study

BACKGROUND: Spinal stabilisation is recommended for prehospital trauma treatment. In Germany, vacuum mattresses are traditionally used for spinal stabilisation, whereas in anglo-american countries, long spine boards are preferred. While it is recommended that the on-scene time is as short as possibl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MS, Roessler, Riffelmann, M, Kunze-Szikszay, N, Lier, M, Schmid, O, Haus, H, Schneider, S, JF, Heuer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00854-w
_version_ 1783663980321964032
author MS, Roessler
Riffelmann, M
Kunze-Szikszay, N
Lier, M
Schmid, O
Haus, H
Schneider, S
JF, Heuer
author_facet MS, Roessler
Riffelmann, M
Kunze-Szikszay, N
Lier, M
Schmid, O
Haus, H
Schneider, S
JF, Heuer
author_sort MS, Roessler
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal stabilisation is recommended for prehospital trauma treatment. In Germany, vacuum mattresses are traditionally used for spinal stabilisation, whereas in anglo-american countries, long spine boards are preferred. While it is recommended that the on-scene time is as short as possible, even less than 10 minutes for unstable patients, spinal stabilisation is a time-consuming procedure. For this reason, the time needed for spinal stabilisation may prevent the on-scene time from being brief. The aim of this simulation study was to compare the time required for spinal stabilisation between a scoop stretcher in conjunction with a vacuum mattress and a long spine board. METHODS: Medical personnel of different professions were asked to perform spinal immobilizations with both methods. A total of 172 volunteers were immobilized under ideal conditions as well as under realistic conditions. A vacuum mattress was used for 78 spinal stabilisations, and a long spinal board was used for 94. The duration of the procedures were measured by video analysis. RESULTS: Under ideal conditions, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress and a spine board required 254.4 s (95 % CI 235.6–273.2 s) and 83.4 s (95 % CI 77.5–89.3 s), respectively (p < 0.01). Under realistic conditions, the vacuum mattress and spine board required 358.3 s (95 % CI 316.0–400.6 s) and 112.6 s (95 % CI 102.6–122.6 s), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal stabilisation for trauma patients is significantly more time consuming on a vacuum mattress than on a long spine board. Considering that the prehospital time of EMS should not exceed 60 minutes and the on-scene time should not exceed 30 minutes or even 10 minutes if the patient is in extremis, based on our results, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress may consume more than 20 % of the recommended on-scene time. In contrast, stabilisation on a spine board requires only one third of the time required for that on a vacuum mattress. We conclude that a long spine board may be feasible for spinal stabilisation for critical trauma patients with timesensitive life threatening ABCDE-problems to ensure the shortest possible on-scene time for prehospital trauma treatment, not least if a patient has to be rescued from an open or inaccessible terrain, especially that with uneven overgrown land.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7953765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79537652021-03-15 Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study MS, Roessler Riffelmann, M Kunze-Szikszay, N Lier, M Schmid, O Haus, H Schneider, S JF, Heuer Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Spinal stabilisation is recommended for prehospital trauma treatment. In Germany, vacuum mattresses are traditionally used for spinal stabilisation, whereas in anglo-american countries, long spine boards are preferred. While it is recommended that the on-scene time is as short as possible, even less than 10 minutes for unstable patients, spinal stabilisation is a time-consuming procedure. For this reason, the time needed for spinal stabilisation may prevent the on-scene time from being brief. The aim of this simulation study was to compare the time required for spinal stabilisation between a scoop stretcher in conjunction with a vacuum mattress and a long spine board. METHODS: Medical personnel of different professions were asked to perform spinal immobilizations with both methods. A total of 172 volunteers were immobilized under ideal conditions as well as under realistic conditions. A vacuum mattress was used for 78 spinal stabilisations, and a long spinal board was used for 94. The duration of the procedures were measured by video analysis. RESULTS: Under ideal conditions, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress and a spine board required 254.4 s (95 % CI 235.6–273.2 s) and 83.4 s (95 % CI 77.5–89.3 s), respectively (p < 0.01). Under realistic conditions, the vacuum mattress and spine board required 358.3 s (95 % CI 316.0–400.6 s) and 112.6 s (95 % CI 102.6–122.6 s), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal stabilisation for trauma patients is significantly more time consuming on a vacuum mattress than on a long spine board. Considering that the prehospital time of EMS should not exceed 60 minutes and the on-scene time should not exceed 30 minutes or even 10 minutes if the patient is in extremis, based on our results, spinal stabilisation on a vacuum mattress may consume more than 20 % of the recommended on-scene time. In contrast, stabilisation on a spine board requires only one third of the time required for that on a vacuum mattress. We conclude that a long spine board may be feasible for spinal stabilisation for critical trauma patients with timesensitive life threatening ABCDE-problems to ensure the shortest possible on-scene time for prehospital trauma treatment, not least if a patient has to be rescued from an open or inaccessible terrain, especially that with uneven overgrown land. BioMed Central 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7953765/ /pubmed/33706791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00854-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
MS, Roessler
Riffelmann, M
Kunze-Szikszay, N
Lier, M
Schmid, O
Haus, H
Schneider, S
JF, Heuer
Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
title Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
title_full Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
title_fullStr Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
title_short Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study
title_sort vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? a simulation study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00854-w
work_keys_str_mv AT msroessler vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT riffelmannm vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT kunzeszikszayn vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT lierm vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT schmido vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT haush vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT schneiders vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy
AT jfheuer vacuummattressorlongspineboardwhichmethodofspinalstabilisationintraumapatientsismoretimeconsumingasimulationstudy