Cargando…

The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore why some calcar screws are malpositioned when a proximal humeral fracture is treated by internal fixation with a locking plate, and to identify risk factors for this phenomenon. Some suggestions can be made of ways to avoid this error. METHODS: We retrospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Qiuke, Sheng, Ning, Rui, Biyu, Chen, Yunfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0070.R1
_version_ 1783664023415291904
author Wang, Qiuke
Sheng, Ning
Rui, Biyu
Chen, Yunfeng
author_facet Wang, Qiuke
Sheng, Ning
Rui, Biyu
Chen, Yunfeng
author_sort Wang, Qiuke
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore why some calcar screws are malpositioned when a proximal humeral fracture is treated by internal fixation with a locking plate, and to identify risk factors for this phenomenon. Some suggestions can be made of ways to avoid this error. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all proximal humeral fractures treated in our institution between October 2016 and October 2018 using the hospital information system. The patients’ medical and radiological data were collected, and we divided potential risk factors into two groups: preoperative factors and intraoperative factors. Preoperative factors included age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, proximal humeral bone mineral density, type of fracture, the condition of the medial hinge, and medial metaphyseal head extension. Intraoperative factors included the grade of surgeon, neck-shaft angle after reduction, humeral head height, restoration of medial support, and quality of reduction. Adjusted binary logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the multivariable model. RESULTS: Data from 203 patients (63 males and 140 females) with a mean age of 62 years (22 to 89) were analyzed. In 49 fractures, the calcar screw was considered to be malpositioned; in 154 it was in the optimal position. The rate of malpositioning was therefore 24% (49/203). No preoperative risk factor was found for malpositioning of the calcar screws. Only the neck-shaft angle was found to be related to the risk of screw malpositioning in a multivariate model (with an AUC of 0.72). For the fractures in which the neck-shaft angle was reduced to between 130° and 150°, 91% (133/46) of calcar screws were in the optimal position. CONCLUSION: The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the appropriate positioning of calcar screws when treating a proximal humeral fracture with a locking plate. We recommend reducing the angle to between 130° and 150°. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1629–1635.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7954146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79541462021-03-17 The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate Wang, Qiuke Sheng, Ning Rui, Biyu Chen, Yunfeng Bone Joint J Shoulder & Elbow AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore why some calcar screws are malpositioned when a proximal humeral fracture is treated by internal fixation with a locking plate, and to identify risk factors for this phenomenon. Some suggestions can be made of ways to avoid this error. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all proximal humeral fractures treated in our institution between October 2016 and October 2018 using the hospital information system. The patients’ medical and radiological data were collected, and we divided potential risk factors into two groups: preoperative factors and intraoperative factors. Preoperative factors included age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, proximal humeral bone mineral density, type of fracture, the condition of the medial hinge, and medial metaphyseal head extension. Intraoperative factors included the grade of surgeon, neck-shaft angle after reduction, humeral head height, restoration of medial support, and quality of reduction. Adjusted binary logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the multivariable model. RESULTS: Data from 203 patients (63 males and 140 females) with a mean age of 62 years (22 to 89) were analyzed. In 49 fractures, the calcar screw was considered to be malpositioned; in 154 it was in the optimal position. The rate of malpositioning was therefore 24% (49/203). No preoperative risk factor was found for malpositioning of the calcar screws. Only the neck-shaft angle was found to be related to the risk of screw malpositioning in a multivariate model (with an AUC of 0.72). For the fractures in which the neck-shaft angle was reduced to between 130° and 150°, 91% (133/46) of calcar screws were in the optimal position. CONCLUSION: The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the appropriate positioning of calcar screws when treating a proximal humeral fracture with a locking plate. We recommend reducing the angle to between 130° and 150°. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1629–1635. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-12 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7954146/ /pubmed/33249912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0070.R1 Text en ©2020 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Shoulder & Elbow
Wang, Qiuke
Sheng, Ning
Rui, Biyu
Chen, Yunfeng
The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
title The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
title_full The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
title_fullStr The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
title_full_unstemmed The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
title_short The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
title_sort neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate
topic Shoulder & Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0070.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT wangqiuke theneckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT shengning theneckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT ruibiyu theneckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT chenyunfeng theneckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT wangqiuke neckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT shengning neckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT ruibiyu neckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate
AT chenyunfeng neckshaftangleisthekeyfactorforthepositioningofcalcarscrewwhentreatingproximalhumeralfractureswithalockingplate