Cargando…

Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: In the absence of any exclusive classification for dorsal FJA, there is a lot of confusion while labelling grade 1 FJA in thoracic spine based on decreased FJ space. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to know the facet joint space measurements in thoracic spine of asymptomatic and sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiwari, Punit, Kaur, Harmeet, Jha, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_390_20
_version_ 1783664027134590976
author Tiwari, Punit
Kaur, Harmeet
Jha, Vivek
author_facet Tiwari, Punit
Kaur, Harmeet
Jha, Vivek
author_sort Tiwari, Punit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the absence of any exclusive classification for dorsal FJA, there is a lot of confusion while labelling grade 1 FJA in thoracic spine based on decreased FJ space. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to know the facet joint space measurements in thoracic spine of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants and to comment whether the lower cut-off of 2 mm used in lumbar FJA classification can be safely applied in thoracic spine too. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was done from December 1, 2018 to November 30, 2019. Patients above 18 years of age in this study who underwent CT thorax for causes unrelated to dorsal spinal pain were included. IBM SPSS Statistics v 26 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We measured and analysed 1512 thoracic facet joints in 63 patients (30 females and 33 males) in both axial and sagittal plane on CT scan. Mean age of the entire sample was 59.19 ± 15.19 years, ranging from 33 to 97 years and a standard error of mean 1.365 years. Overall mean thoracic facet joint space was measured to be 1.270 mm ± 0.3416 mm, ranging from 0 to 3.1 mm and a standard error of mean 0.0088 mm and a variance of 0.117 mm. The median was 1.300 mm while mode was 1.1 mm. CONCLUSION: The popular lumbar FJA classification by Weishupt et al. cannot be applied in its present form in thoracic spine, without the modification in parameters of grade 1 FJA. The lower cut-off of normal thoracic facet joint space probably lies around 1 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7954162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79541622021-03-17 Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study Tiwari, Punit Kaur, Harmeet Jha, Vivek Indian J Radiol Imaging Musculoskeletal Imaging BACKGROUND: In the absence of any exclusive classification for dorsal FJA, there is a lot of confusion while labelling grade 1 FJA in thoracic spine based on decreased FJ space. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to know the facet joint space measurements in thoracic spine of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants and to comment whether the lower cut-off of 2 mm used in lumbar FJA classification can be safely applied in thoracic spine too. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was done from December 1, 2018 to November 30, 2019. Patients above 18 years of age in this study who underwent CT thorax for causes unrelated to dorsal spinal pain were included. IBM SPSS Statistics v 26 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We measured and analysed 1512 thoracic facet joints in 63 patients (30 females and 33 males) in both axial and sagittal plane on CT scan. Mean age of the entire sample was 59.19 ± 15.19 years, ranging from 33 to 97 years and a standard error of mean 1.365 years. Overall mean thoracic facet joint space was measured to be 1.270 mm ± 0.3416 mm, ranging from 0 to 3.1 mm and a standard error of mean 0.0088 mm and a variance of 0.117 mm. The median was 1.300 mm while mode was 1.1 mm. CONCLUSION: The popular lumbar FJA classification by Weishupt et al. cannot be applied in its present form in thoracic spine, without the modification in parameters of grade 1 FJA. The lower cut-off of normal thoracic facet joint space probably lies around 1 mm. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7954162/ /pubmed/33737771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_390_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal Imaging
Tiwari, Punit
Kaur, Harmeet
Jha, Vivek
Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
title Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
title_full Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
title_short Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
title_sort is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? it's time to review ct grading parameters - an analytical cross-sectional study
topic Musculoskeletal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_390_20
work_keys_str_mv AT tiwaripunit isthoracicfacetjointarthritisoverreporteditstimetoreviewctgradingparametersananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy
AT kaurharmeet isthoracicfacetjointarthritisoverreporteditstimetoreviewctgradingparametersananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy
AT jhavivek isthoracicfacetjointarthritisoverreporteditstimetoreviewctgradingparametersananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy