Cargando…
Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: In the absence of any exclusive classification for dorsal FJA, there is a lot of confusion while labelling grade 1 FJA in thoracic spine based on decreased FJ space. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to know the facet joint space measurements in thoracic spine of asymptomatic and sy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_390_20 |
_version_ | 1783664027134590976 |
---|---|
author | Tiwari, Punit Kaur, Harmeet Jha, Vivek |
author_facet | Tiwari, Punit Kaur, Harmeet Jha, Vivek |
author_sort | Tiwari, Punit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the absence of any exclusive classification for dorsal FJA, there is a lot of confusion while labelling grade 1 FJA in thoracic spine based on decreased FJ space. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to know the facet joint space measurements in thoracic spine of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants and to comment whether the lower cut-off of 2 mm used in lumbar FJA classification can be safely applied in thoracic spine too. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was done from December 1, 2018 to November 30, 2019. Patients above 18 years of age in this study who underwent CT thorax for causes unrelated to dorsal spinal pain were included. IBM SPSS Statistics v 26 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We measured and analysed 1512 thoracic facet joints in 63 patients (30 females and 33 males) in both axial and sagittal plane on CT scan. Mean age of the entire sample was 59.19 ± 15.19 years, ranging from 33 to 97 years and a standard error of mean 1.365 years. Overall mean thoracic facet joint space was measured to be 1.270 mm ± 0.3416 mm, ranging from 0 to 3.1 mm and a standard error of mean 0.0088 mm and a variance of 0.117 mm. The median was 1.300 mm while mode was 1.1 mm. CONCLUSION: The popular lumbar FJA classification by Weishupt et al. cannot be applied in its present form in thoracic spine, without the modification in parameters of grade 1 FJA. The lower cut-off of normal thoracic facet joint space probably lies around 1 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7954162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79541622021-03-17 Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study Tiwari, Punit Kaur, Harmeet Jha, Vivek Indian J Radiol Imaging Musculoskeletal Imaging BACKGROUND: In the absence of any exclusive classification for dorsal FJA, there is a lot of confusion while labelling grade 1 FJA in thoracic spine based on decreased FJ space. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to know the facet joint space measurements in thoracic spine of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants and to comment whether the lower cut-off of 2 mm used in lumbar FJA classification can be safely applied in thoracic spine too. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was done from December 1, 2018 to November 30, 2019. Patients above 18 years of age in this study who underwent CT thorax for causes unrelated to dorsal spinal pain were included. IBM SPSS Statistics v 26 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We measured and analysed 1512 thoracic facet joints in 63 patients (30 females and 33 males) in both axial and sagittal plane on CT scan. Mean age of the entire sample was 59.19 ± 15.19 years, ranging from 33 to 97 years and a standard error of mean 1.365 years. Overall mean thoracic facet joint space was measured to be 1.270 mm ± 0.3416 mm, ranging from 0 to 3.1 mm and a standard error of mean 0.0088 mm and a variance of 0.117 mm. The median was 1.300 mm while mode was 1.1 mm. CONCLUSION: The popular lumbar FJA classification by Weishupt et al. cannot be applied in its present form in thoracic spine, without the modification in parameters of grade 1 FJA. The lower cut-off of normal thoracic facet joint space probably lies around 1 mm. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7954162/ /pubmed/33737771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_390_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Imaging Tiwari, Punit Kaur, Harmeet Jha, Vivek Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study |
title | Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study |
title_full | Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study |
title_short | Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It's time to review CT grading parameters - An analytical cross-sectional study |
title_sort | is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? it's time to review ct grading parameters - an analytical cross-sectional study |
topic | Musculoskeletal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_390_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiwaripunit isthoracicfacetjointarthritisoverreporteditstimetoreviewctgradingparametersananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy AT kaurharmeet isthoracicfacetjointarthritisoverreporteditstimetoreviewctgradingparametersananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy AT jhavivek isthoracicfacetjointarthritisoverreporteditstimetoreviewctgradingparametersananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy |