Cargando…

Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banger, Matthew S., Johnston, William D., Razii, Nima, Doonan, James, Rowe, Philip J., Jones, Bryn G., MacLean, Angus D., Blyth, Mark J. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33135443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1
_version_ 1783664032275759104
author Banger, Matthew S.
Johnston, William D.
Razii, Nima
Doonan, James
Rowe, Philip J.
Jones, Bryn G.
MacLean, Angus D.
Blyth, Mark J. G.
author_facet Banger, Matthew S.
Johnston, William D.
Razii, Nima
Doonan, James
Rowe, Philip J.
Jones, Bryn G.
MacLean, Angus D.
Blyth, Mark J. G.
author_sort Banger, Matthew S.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. METHODS: An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The pre- to postoperative changes in joint anatomy were significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA in all three planes in both the femur and tibia, except for femoral sagittal component orientation in which there was no difference. Overall, for the six parameters of alignment (three femoral and three tibial), 47% of bi-UKAs and 24% TKAs had a change of < 2° (p = 0.045). The change in HKAA towards neutral in varus and valgus knees was significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA compared with those undergoing TKA (p < 0.001). Alignment was neutral in those undergoing TKA (mean 179.5° (SD 3.2°)) while those undergoing bi-UKA had mild residual varus or valgus alignment (mean 177.8° (SD 3.4°)) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted, cruciate-sparing bi-UKA maintains the natural anatomy of the knee in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes better, and may therefore preserve normal joint kinematics, compared with a mechanically aligned TKA. This includes preservation of coronal joint line obliquity. HKAA alignment was corrected towards neutral significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA, which may represent restoration of the pre-disease constitutional alignment (p < 0.001). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1511–1518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7954184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79541842021-03-17 Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial Banger, Matthew S. Johnston, William D. Razii, Nima Doonan, James Rowe, Philip J. Jones, Bryn G. MacLean, Angus D. Blyth, Mark J. G. Bone Joint J Knee AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. METHODS: An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The pre- to postoperative changes in joint anatomy were significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA in all three planes in both the femur and tibia, except for femoral sagittal component orientation in which there was no difference. Overall, for the six parameters of alignment (three femoral and three tibial), 47% of bi-UKAs and 24% TKAs had a change of < 2° (p = 0.045). The change in HKAA towards neutral in varus and valgus knees was significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA compared with those undergoing TKA (p < 0.001). Alignment was neutral in those undergoing TKA (mean 179.5° (SD 3.2°)) while those undergoing bi-UKA had mild residual varus or valgus alignment (mean 177.8° (SD 3.4°)) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted, cruciate-sparing bi-UKA maintains the natural anatomy of the knee in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes better, and may therefore preserve normal joint kinematics, compared with a mechanically aligned TKA. This includes preservation of coronal joint line obliquity. HKAA alignment was corrected towards neutral significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA, which may represent restoration of the pre-disease constitutional alignment (p < 0.001). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1511–1518. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-11 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7954184/ /pubmed/33135443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Knee
Banger, Matthew S.
Johnston, William D.
Razii, Nima
Doonan, James
Rowe, Philip J.
Jones, Bryn G.
MacLean, Angus D.
Blyth, Mark J. G.
Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33135443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT bangermatthews roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT johnstonwilliamd roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT raziinima roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doonanjames roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rowephilipj roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jonesbryng roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT macleanangusd roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blythmarkjg roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial