Cargando…
Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial
AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33135443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1 |
_version_ | 1783664032275759104 |
---|---|
author | Banger, Matthew S. Johnston, William D. Razii, Nima Doonan, James Rowe, Philip J. Jones, Bryn G. MacLean, Angus D. Blyth, Mark J. G. |
author_facet | Banger, Matthew S. Johnston, William D. Razii, Nima Doonan, James Rowe, Philip J. Jones, Bryn G. MacLean, Angus D. Blyth, Mark J. G. |
author_sort | Banger, Matthew S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. METHODS: An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The pre- to postoperative changes in joint anatomy were significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA in all three planes in both the femur and tibia, except for femoral sagittal component orientation in which there was no difference. Overall, for the six parameters of alignment (three femoral and three tibial), 47% of bi-UKAs and 24% TKAs had a change of < 2° (p = 0.045). The change in HKAA towards neutral in varus and valgus knees was significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA compared with those undergoing TKA (p < 0.001). Alignment was neutral in those undergoing TKA (mean 179.5° (SD 3.2°)) while those undergoing bi-UKA had mild residual varus or valgus alignment (mean 177.8° (SD 3.4°)) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted, cruciate-sparing bi-UKA maintains the natural anatomy of the knee in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes better, and may therefore preserve normal joint kinematics, compared with a mechanically aligned TKA. This includes preservation of coronal joint line obliquity. HKAA alignment was corrected towards neutral significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA, which may represent restoration of the pre-disease constitutional alignment (p < 0.001). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1511–1518. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7954184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79541842021-03-17 Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial Banger, Matthew S. Johnston, William D. Razii, Nima Doonan, James Rowe, Philip J. Jones, Bryn G. MacLean, Angus D. Blyth, Mark J. G. Bone Joint J Knee AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. METHODS: An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The pre- to postoperative changes in joint anatomy were significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA in all three planes in both the femur and tibia, except for femoral sagittal component orientation in which there was no difference. Overall, for the six parameters of alignment (three femoral and three tibial), 47% of bi-UKAs and 24% TKAs had a change of < 2° (p = 0.045). The change in HKAA towards neutral in varus and valgus knees was significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA compared with those undergoing TKA (p < 0.001). Alignment was neutral in those undergoing TKA (mean 179.5° (SD 3.2°)) while those undergoing bi-UKA had mild residual varus or valgus alignment (mean 177.8° (SD 3.4°)) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted, cruciate-sparing bi-UKA maintains the natural anatomy of the knee in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes better, and may therefore preserve normal joint kinematics, compared with a mechanically aligned TKA. This includes preservation of coronal joint line obliquity. HKAA alignment was corrected towards neutral significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA, which may represent restoration of the pre-disease constitutional alignment (p < 0.001). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1511–1518. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-11 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7954184/ /pubmed/33135443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Knee Banger, Matthew S. Johnston, William D. Razii, Nima Doonan, James Rowe, Philip J. Jones, Bryn G. MacLean, Angus D. Blyth, Mark J. G. Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title | Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
topic | Knee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33135443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bangermatthews roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT johnstonwilliamd roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT raziinima roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT doonanjames roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rowephilipj roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jonesbryng roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT macleanangusd roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT blythmarkjg roboticarmassistedbiunicompartmentalkneearthroplastymaintainsnaturalkneejointanatomycomparedwithtotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |