Cargando…

Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis

OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moschini, Marco, Zamboni, Stefania, Afferi, Luca, Pradere, Benjamin, Abufaraj, Mohammad, Soria, Francesco, D’Andrea, David, Roupret, Morgan, De la Taille, Alexandre, Simeone, Claudio, Mattei, Agostino, Mathieu, Romain, Bensalah, Karim, Wirth, Manfred Peter, Montorsi, Francesco, Briganti, Alberto, Gallina, Andrea, Simone, Giuseppe, Gallucci, Michele, Di Bona, Carlo, Marra, Giancarlo, Mari, Andrea, Di Trapani, Ettore, Alvarez Maestro, Mario, Krajewski, Wojciech, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Xylinas, Evanguelos, Baumeister, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720
_version_ 1783664091532886016
author Moschini, Marco
Zamboni, Stefania
Afferi, Luca
Pradere, Benjamin
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Soria, Francesco
D’Andrea, David
Roupret, Morgan
De la Taille, Alexandre
Simeone, Claudio
Mattei, Agostino
Mathieu, Romain
Bensalah, Karim
Wirth, Manfred Peter
Montorsi, Francesco
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Simone, Giuseppe
Gallucci, Michele
Di Bona, Carlo
Marra, Giancarlo
Mari, Andrea
Di Trapani, Ettore
Alvarez Maestro, Mario
Krajewski, Wojciech
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Baumeister, Philipp
author_facet Moschini, Marco
Zamboni, Stefania
Afferi, Luca
Pradere, Benjamin
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Soria, Francesco
D’Andrea, David
Roupret, Morgan
De la Taille, Alexandre
Simeone, Claudio
Mattei, Agostino
Mathieu, Romain
Bensalah, Karim
Wirth, Manfred Peter
Montorsi, Francesco
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Simone, Giuseppe
Gallucci, Michele
Di Bona, Carlo
Marra, Giancarlo
Mari, Andrea
Di Trapani, Ettore
Alvarez Maestro, Mario
Krajewski, Wojciech
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Baumeister, Philipp
author_sort Moschini, Marco
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. RESULTS: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence (P = 0.08), CSM (P = 0.1) or OM (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. ABBREVIATIONS: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7954493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79544932021-03-23 Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis Moschini, Marco Zamboni, Stefania Afferi, Luca Pradere, Benjamin Abufaraj, Mohammad Soria, Francesco D’Andrea, David Roupret, Morgan De la Taille, Alexandre Simeone, Claudio Mattei, Agostino Mathieu, Romain Bensalah, Karim Wirth, Manfred Peter Montorsi, Francesco Briganti, Alberto Gallina, Andrea Simone, Giuseppe Gallucci, Michele Di Bona, Carlo Marra, Giancarlo Mari, Andrea Di Trapani, Ettore Alvarez Maestro, Mario Krajewski, Wojciech Shariat, Shahrokh F. Xylinas, Evanguelos Baumeister, Philipp Arab J Urol Management of UTUC OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. RESULTS: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence (P = 0.08), CSM (P = 0.1) or OM (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. ABBREVIATIONS: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma Taylor & Francis 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7954493/ /pubmed/33763246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Management of UTUC
Moschini, Marco
Zamboni, Stefania
Afferi, Luca
Pradere, Benjamin
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Soria, Francesco
D’Andrea, David
Roupret, Morgan
De la Taille, Alexandre
Simeone, Claudio
Mattei, Agostino
Mathieu, Romain
Bensalah, Karim
Wirth, Manfred Peter
Montorsi, Francesco
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Simone, Giuseppe
Gallucci, Michele
Di Bona, Carlo
Marra, Giancarlo
Mari, Andrea
Di Trapani, Ettore
Alvarez Maestro, Mario
Krajewski, Wojciech
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Baumeister, Philipp
Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Management of UTUC
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720
work_keys_str_mv AT moschinimarco comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zambonistefania comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT afferiluca comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT praderebenjamin comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT abufarajmohammad comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT soriafrancesco comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT dandreadavid comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT roupretmorgan comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT delataillealexandre comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT simeoneclaudio comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT matteiagostino comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT mathieuromain comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT bensalahkarim comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT wirthmanfredpeter comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT montorsifrancesco comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT brigantialberto comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT gallinaandrea comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT simonegiuseppe comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT galluccimichele comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT dibonacarlo comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT marragiancarlo comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT mariandrea comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT ditrapaniettore comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT alvarezmaestromario comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT krajewskiwojciech comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT shariatshahrokhf comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT xylinasevanguelos comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT baumeisterphilipp comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis