Cargando…
Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720 |
_version_ | 1783664091532886016 |
---|---|
author | Moschini, Marco Zamboni, Stefania Afferi, Luca Pradere, Benjamin Abufaraj, Mohammad Soria, Francesco D’Andrea, David Roupret, Morgan De la Taille, Alexandre Simeone, Claudio Mattei, Agostino Mathieu, Romain Bensalah, Karim Wirth, Manfred Peter Montorsi, Francesco Briganti, Alberto Gallina, Andrea Simone, Giuseppe Gallucci, Michele Di Bona, Carlo Marra, Giancarlo Mari, Andrea Di Trapani, Ettore Alvarez Maestro, Mario Krajewski, Wojciech Shariat, Shahrokh F. Xylinas, Evanguelos Baumeister, Philipp |
author_facet | Moschini, Marco Zamboni, Stefania Afferi, Luca Pradere, Benjamin Abufaraj, Mohammad Soria, Francesco D’Andrea, David Roupret, Morgan De la Taille, Alexandre Simeone, Claudio Mattei, Agostino Mathieu, Romain Bensalah, Karim Wirth, Manfred Peter Montorsi, Francesco Briganti, Alberto Gallina, Andrea Simone, Giuseppe Gallucci, Michele Di Bona, Carlo Marra, Giancarlo Mari, Andrea Di Trapani, Ettore Alvarez Maestro, Mario Krajewski, Wojciech Shariat, Shahrokh F. Xylinas, Evanguelos Baumeister, Philipp |
author_sort | Moschini, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. RESULTS: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence (P = 0.08), CSM (P = 0.1) or OM (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. ABBREVIATIONS: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7954493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79544932021-03-23 Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis Moschini, Marco Zamboni, Stefania Afferi, Luca Pradere, Benjamin Abufaraj, Mohammad Soria, Francesco D’Andrea, David Roupret, Morgan De la Taille, Alexandre Simeone, Claudio Mattei, Agostino Mathieu, Romain Bensalah, Karim Wirth, Manfred Peter Montorsi, Francesco Briganti, Alberto Gallina, Andrea Simone, Giuseppe Gallucci, Michele Di Bona, Carlo Marra, Giancarlo Mari, Andrea Di Trapani, Ettore Alvarez Maestro, Mario Krajewski, Wojciech Shariat, Shahrokh F. Xylinas, Evanguelos Baumeister, Philipp Arab J Urol Management of UTUC OBJECTIVES: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. RESULTS: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence (P = 0.08), CSM (P = 0.1) or OM (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. ABBREVIATIONS: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma Taylor & Francis 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7954493/ /pubmed/33763246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Management of UTUC Moschini, Marco Zamboni, Stefania Afferi, Luca Pradere, Benjamin Abufaraj, Mohammad Soria, Francesco D’Andrea, David Roupret, Morgan De la Taille, Alexandre Simeone, Claudio Mattei, Agostino Mathieu, Romain Bensalah, Karim Wirth, Manfred Peter Montorsi, Francesco Briganti, Alberto Gallina, Andrea Simone, Giuseppe Gallucci, Michele Di Bona, Carlo Marra, Giancarlo Mari, Andrea Di Trapani, Ettore Alvarez Maestro, Mario Krajewski, Wojciech Shariat, Shahrokh F. Xylinas, Evanguelos Baumeister, Philipp Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title | Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full | Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_short | Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_sort | comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
topic | Management of UTUC |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moschinimarco comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT zambonistefania comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT afferiluca comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT praderebenjamin comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT abufarajmohammad comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT soriafrancesco comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT dandreadavid comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT roupretmorgan comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT delataillealexandre comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT simeoneclaudio comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT matteiagostino comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT mathieuromain comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT bensalahkarim comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT wirthmanfredpeter comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT montorsifrancesco comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT brigantialberto comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT gallinaandrea comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT simonegiuseppe comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT galluccimichele comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT dibonacarlo comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT marragiancarlo comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT mariandrea comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT ditrapaniettore comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT alvarezmaestromario comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT krajewskiwojciech comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT shariatshahrokhf comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT xylinasevanguelos comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT baumeisterphilipp comparingoncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicvsopenradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis |