Cargando…

Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the general course of acoustic, patient rated, and clinician-rated voice outcomes from pre- up to 12 months post total laryngectomy. METHODS: Patients admitted to a total laryngectomy in five participating hospitals in Australia and The Netherlands wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Sluis, Klaske E., van Son, Rob J. J. H., van der Molen, Lisette, MCGuinness, Anthony John, Palme, Carsten E., Novakovic, Daniel, Stone, Danielle, Natsis, Lydia, Charters, Emma, Jones, Kelly, Dirven, Richard, van den Brekel, Michiel W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06216-z
_version_ 1783664133430837248
author van Sluis, Klaske E.
van Son, Rob J. J. H.
van der Molen, Lisette
MCGuinness, Anthony John
Palme, Carsten E.
Novakovic, Daniel
Stone, Danielle
Natsis, Lydia
Charters, Emma
Jones, Kelly
Dirven, Richard
van den Brekel, Michiel W. M.
author_facet van Sluis, Klaske E.
van Son, Rob J. J. H.
van der Molen, Lisette
MCGuinness, Anthony John
Palme, Carsten E.
Novakovic, Daniel
Stone, Danielle
Natsis, Lydia
Charters, Emma
Jones, Kelly
Dirven, Richard
van den Brekel, Michiel W. M.
author_sort van Sluis, Klaske E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the general course of acoustic, patient rated, and clinician-rated voice outcomes from pre- up to 12 months post total laryngectomy. METHODS: Patients admitted to a total laryngectomy in five participating hospitals in Australia and The Netherlands were included. Assessments took place at pre-, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. Voice outcomes are evaluated with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), perceptual scales, and patient-reported outcome measures including VHI-10 and EQ-5D-5L. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics, t tests (pre- to 6 months post-surgery), Linear Mixed Effect models. RESULTS: The study included 43 participants. A significant worsening of AVQI is seen from pre- to post-surgery evaluated with t test (p < 0.001). The Linear Mixed Effect model confirmed Time as a significant factor in predicting AVQI score (p ≤ 0.001), as well as perceptual rated voice quality by the clinician (p = 0.015) and patient-reported perceptual rated voice quality (p = 0.002). No statistical significance was found in VHI-10 scores over time. CONCLUSION: Successful TE-speech was achieved in most participants, some had to rely on augmentative alternative communication methods. Patient-reported outcomes indicate acceptance of the condition and sufficient coping in the long term. However, acoustic rated voice quality is abnormal at all post-surgery time-points. AVQI proved to be a useful instrument to evaluate TE-speech. There is a need for validation and determination of cut-off values for VHI-10 and AVQI for use in TE-speech.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7954718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79547182021-03-28 Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study van Sluis, Klaske E. van Son, Rob J. J. H. van der Molen, Lisette MCGuinness, Anthony John Palme, Carsten E. Novakovic, Daniel Stone, Danielle Natsis, Lydia Charters, Emma Jones, Kelly Dirven, Richard van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the general course of acoustic, patient rated, and clinician-rated voice outcomes from pre- up to 12 months post total laryngectomy. METHODS: Patients admitted to a total laryngectomy in five participating hospitals in Australia and The Netherlands were included. Assessments took place at pre-, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. Voice outcomes are evaluated with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), perceptual scales, and patient-reported outcome measures including VHI-10 and EQ-5D-5L. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics, t tests (pre- to 6 months post-surgery), Linear Mixed Effect models. RESULTS: The study included 43 participants. A significant worsening of AVQI is seen from pre- to post-surgery evaluated with t test (p < 0.001). The Linear Mixed Effect model confirmed Time as a significant factor in predicting AVQI score (p ≤ 0.001), as well as perceptual rated voice quality by the clinician (p = 0.015) and patient-reported perceptual rated voice quality (p = 0.002). No statistical significance was found in VHI-10 scores over time. CONCLUSION: Successful TE-speech was achieved in most participants, some had to rely on augmentative alternative communication methods. Patient-reported outcomes indicate acceptance of the condition and sufficient coping in the long term. However, acoustic rated voice quality is abnormal at all post-surgery time-points. AVQI proved to be a useful instrument to evaluate TE-speech. There is a need for validation and determination of cut-off values for VHI-10 and AVQI for use in TE-speech. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7954718/ /pubmed/32696251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06216-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
van Sluis, Klaske E.
van Son, Rob J. J. H.
van der Molen, Lisette
MCGuinness, Anthony John
Palme, Carsten E.
Novakovic, Daniel
Stone, Danielle
Natsis, Lydia
Charters, Emma
Jones, Kelly
Dirven, Richard
van den Brekel, Michiel W. M.
Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
title Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
title_full Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
title_fullStr Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
title_short Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
title_sort multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06216-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vansluisklaskee multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT vansonrobjjh multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT vandermolenlisette multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT mcguinnessanthonyjohn multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT palmecarstene multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT novakovicdaniel multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT stonedanielle multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT natsislydia multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT chartersemma multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT joneskelly multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT dirvenrichard multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT vandenbrekelmichielwm multidimensionalevaluationofvoiceoutcomesfollowingtotallaryngectomyaprospectivemulticentercohortstudy