Cargando…
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
Digital contact tracing is a relevant tool to control infectious disease outbreaks, including the COVID-19 epidemic. Early work evaluating digital contact tracing omitted important features and heterogeneities of real-world contact patterns influencing contagion dynamics. We fill this gap with a mod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w |
_version_ | 1783664184310890496 |
---|---|
author | Cencetti, G. Santin, G. Longa, A. Pigani, E. Barrat, A. Cattuto, C. Lehmann, S. Salathé, M. Lepri, B. |
author_facet | Cencetti, G. Santin, G. Longa, A. Pigani, E. Barrat, A. Cattuto, C. Lehmann, S. Salathé, M. Lepri, B. |
author_sort | Cencetti, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital contact tracing is a relevant tool to control infectious disease outbreaks, including the COVID-19 epidemic. Early work evaluating digital contact tracing omitted important features and heterogeneities of real-world contact patterns influencing contagion dynamics. We fill this gap with a modeling framework informed by empirical high-resolution contact data to analyze the impact of digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate how well contact tracing apps, coupled with the quarantine of identified contacts, can mitigate the spread in real environments. We find that restrictive policies are more effective in containing the epidemic but come at the cost of unnecessary large-scale quarantines. Policy evaluation through their efficiency and cost results in optimized solutions which only consider contacts longer than 15–20 minutes and closer than 2–3 meters to be at risk. Our results show that isolation and tracing can help control re-emerging outbreaks when some conditions are met: (i) a reduction of the reproductive number through masks and physical distance; (ii) a low-delay isolation of infected individuals; (iii) a high compliance. Finally, we observe the inefficacy of a less privacy-preserving tracing involving second order contacts. Our results may inform digital contact tracing efforts currently being implemented across several countries worldwide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7955065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79550652021-03-28 Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control Cencetti, G. Santin, G. Longa, A. Pigani, E. Barrat, A. Cattuto, C. Lehmann, S. Salathé, M. Lepri, B. Nat Commun Article Digital contact tracing is a relevant tool to control infectious disease outbreaks, including the COVID-19 epidemic. Early work evaluating digital contact tracing omitted important features and heterogeneities of real-world contact patterns influencing contagion dynamics. We fill this gap with a modeling framework informed by empirical high-resolution contact data to analyze the impact of digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate how well contact tracing apps, coupled with the quarantine of identified contacts, can mitigate the spread in real environments. We find that restrictive policies are more effective in containing the epidemic but come at the cost of unnecessary large-scale quarantines. Policy evaluation through their efficiency and cost results in optimized solutions which only consider contacts longer than 15–20 minutes and closer than 2–3 meters to be at risk. Our results show that isolation and tracing can help control re-emerging outbreaks when some conditions are met: (i) a reduction of the reproductive number through masks and physical distance; (ii) a low-delay isolation of infected individuals; (iii) a high compliance. Finally, we observe the inefficacy of a less privacy-preserving tracing involving second order contacts. Our results may inform digital contact tracing efforts currently being implemented across several countries worldwide. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7955065/ /pubmed/33712583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Cencetti, G. Santin, G. Longa, A. Pigani, E. Barrat, A. Cattuto, C. Lehmann, S. Salathé, M. Lepri, B. Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
title | Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
title_full | Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
title_fullStr | Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
title_short | Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
title_sort | digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cencettig digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT santing digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT longaa digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT piganie digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT barrata digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT cattutoc digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT lehmanns digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT salathem digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol AT leprib digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol |