Cargando…

Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control

Digital contact tracing is a relevant tool to control infectious disease outbreaks, including the COVID-19 epidemic. Early work evaluating digital contact tracing omitted important features and heterogeneities of real-world contact patterns influencing contagion dynamics. We fill this gap with a mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cencetti, G., Santin, G., Longa, A., Pigani, E., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Lehmann, S., Salathé, M., Lepri, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w
_version_ 1783664184310890496
author Cencetti, G.
Santin, G.
Longa, A.
Pigani, E.
Barrat, A.
Cattuto, C.
Lehmann, S.
Salathé, M.
Lepri, B.
author_facet Cencetti, G.
Santin, G.
Longa, A.
Pigani, E.
Barrat, A.
Cattuto, C.
Lehmann, S.
Salathé, M.
Lepri, B.
author_sort Cencetti, G.
collection PubMed
description Digital contact tracing is a relevant tool to control infectious disease outbreaks, including the COVID-19 epidemic. Early work evaluating digital contact tracing omitted important features and heterogeneities of real-world contact patterns influencing contagion dynamics. We fill this gap with a modeling framework informed by empirical high-resolution contact data to analyze the impact of digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate how well contact tracing apps, coupled with the quarantine of identified contacts, can mitigate the spread in real environments. We find that restrictive policies are more effective in containing the epidemic but come at the cost of unnecessary large-scale quarantines. Policy evaluation through their efficiency and cost results in optimized solutions which only consider contacts longer than 15–20 minutes and closer than 2–3 meters to be at risk. Our results show that isolation and tracing can help control re-emerging outbreaks when some conditions are met: (i) a reduction of the reproductive number through masks and physical distance; (ii) a low-delay isolation of infected individuals; (iii) a high compliance. Finally, we observe the inefficacy of a less privacy-preserving tracing involving second order contacts. Our results may inform digital contact tracing efforts currently being implemented across several countries worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7955065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79550652021-03-28 Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control Cencetti, G. Santin, G. Longa, A. Pigani, E. Barrat, A. Cattuto, C. Lehmann, S. Salathé, M. Lepri, B. Nat Commun Article Digital contact tracing is a relevant tool to control infectious disease outbreaks, including the COVID-19 epidemic. Early work evaluating digital contact tracing omitted important features and heterogeneities of real-world contact patterns influencing contagion dynamics. We fill this gap with a modeling framework informed by empirical high-resolution contact data to analyze the impact of digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate how well contact tracing apps, coupled with the quarantine of identified contacts, can mitigate the spread in real environments. We find that restrictive policies are more effective in containing the epidemic but come at the cost of unnecessary large-scale quarantines. Policy evaluation through their efficiency and cost results in optimized solutions which only consider contacts longer than 15–20 minutes and closer than 2–3 meters to be at risk. Our results show that isolation and tracing can help control re-emerging outbreaks when some conditions are met: (i) a reduction of the reproductive number through masks and physical distance; (ii) a low-delay isolation of infected individuals; (iii) a high compliance. Finally, we observe the inefficacy of a less privacy-preserving tracing involving second order contacts. Our results may inform digital contact tracing efforts currently being implemented across several countries worldwide. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7955065/ /pubmed/33712583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cencetti, G.
Santin, G.
Longa, A.
Pigani, E.
Barrat, A.
Cattuto, C.
Lehmann, S.
Salathé, M.
Lepri, B.
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
title Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
title_full Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
title_fullStr Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
title_full_unstemmed Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
title_short Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
title_sort digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w
work_keys_str_mv AT cencettig digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT santing digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT longaa digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT piganie digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT barrata digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT cattutoc digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT lehmanns digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT salathem digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol
AT leprib digitalproximitytracingonempiricalcontactnetworksforpandemiccontrol