Cargando…
Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams
Proton therapy allows to avoid excess radiation dose on normal tissues. However, there are some limitations. Indeed, passive delivery of proton beams results in an increase in the lateral dose upstream of the tumor and active scanning leads to strong differences in dose delivery. This study aims to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85394-0 |
_version_ | 1783664194996928512 |
---|---|
author | Leduc, Alexandre Chaouni, Samia Pouzoulet, Frédéric De Marzi, Ludovic Megnin-Chanet, Frédérique Corre, Erwan Stefan, Dinu Habrand, Jean-Louis Sichel, François Laurent, Carine |
author_facet | Leduc, Alexandre Chaouni, Samia Pouzoulet, Frédéric De Marzi, Ludovic Megnin-Chanet, Frédérique Corre, Erwan Stefan, Dinu Habrand, Jean-Louis Sichel, François Laurent, Carine |
author_sort | Leduc, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proton therapy allows to avoid excess radiation dose on normal tissues. However, there are some limitations. Indeed, passive delivery of proton beams results in an increase in the lateral dose upstream of the tumor and active scanning leads to strong differences in dose delivery. This study aims to assess possible differences in the transcriptomic response of skin in C57BL/6 mice after TBI irradiation by active or passive proton beams at the dose of 6 Gy compared to unirradiated mice. In that purpose, total RNA was extracted from skin samples 3 months after irradiation and RNA-Seq was performed. Results showed that active and passive delivery lead to completely different transcription profiles. Indeed, 140 and 167 genes were differentially expressed after active and passive scanning compared to unirradiated, respectively, with only one common gene corresponding to RIKEN cDNA 9930021J03. Moreover, protein–protein interactions performed by STRING analysis showed that 31 and 25 genes are functionally related after active and passive delivery, respectively, with no common gene between both types of proton delivery. Analysis showed that active scanning led to the regulation of genes involved in skin development which was not the case with passive delivery. Moreover, 14 ncRNA were differentially regulated after active scanning against none for passive delivery. Active scanning led to 49 potential mRNA-ncRNA pairs with one ncRNA mainly involved, Gm44383 which is a miRNA. The 43 genes potentially regulated by the miRNA Gm44393 confirmed an important role of active scanning on skin keratin pathway. Our results demonstrated that there are differences in skin gene expression still 3 months after proton irradiation versus unirradiated mouse skin. And strong differences do exist in late skin gene expression between scattered or scanned proton beams. Further investigations are strongly needed to understand this discrepancy and to improve treatments by proton therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7955113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79551132021-03-15 Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams Leduc, Alexandre Chaouni, Samia Pouzoulet, Frédéric De Marzi, Ludovic Megnin-Chanet, Frédérique Corre, Erwan Stefan, Dinu Habrand, Jean-Louis Sichel, François Laurent, Carine Sci Rep Article Proton therapy allows to avoid excess radiation dose on normal tissues. However, there are some limitations. Indeed, passive delivery of proton beams results in an increase in the lateral dose upstream of the tumor and active scanning leads to strong differences in dose delivery. This study aims to assess possible differences in the transcriptomic response of skin in C57BL/6 mice after TBI irradiation by active or passive proton beams at the dose of 6 Gy compared to unirradiated mice. In that purpose, total RNA was extracted from skin samples 3 months after irradiation and RNA-Seq was performed. Results showed that active and passive delivery lead to completely different transcription profiles. Indeed, 140 and 167 genes were differentially expressed after active and passive scanning compared to unirradiated, respectively, with only one common gene corresponding to RIKEN cDNA 9930021J03. Moreover, protein–protein interactions performed by STRING analysis showed that 31 and 25 genes are functionally related after active and passive delivery, respectively, with no common gene between both types of proton delivery. Analysis showed that active scanning led to the regulation of genes involved in skin development which was not the case with passive delivery. Moreover, 14 ncRNA were differentially regulated after active scanning against none for passive delivery. Active scanning led to 49 potential mRNA-ncRNA pairs with one ncRNA mainly involved, Gm44383 which is a miRNA. The 43 genes potentially regulated by the miRNA Gm44393 confirmed an important role of active scanning on skin keratin pathway. Our results demonstrated that there are differences in skin gene expression still 3 months after proton irradiation versus unirradiated mouse skin. And strong differences do exist in late skin gene expression between scattered or scanned proton beams. Further investigations are strongly needed to understand this discrepancy and to improve treatments by proton therapy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7955113/ /pubmed/33712719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85394-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Leduc, Alexandre Chaouni, Samia Pouzoulet, Frédéric De Marzi, Ludovic Megnin-Chanet, Frédérique Corre, Erwan Stefan, Dinu Habrand, Jean-Louis Sichel, François Laurent, Carine Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
title | Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
title_full | Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
title_fullStr | Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
title_short | Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
title_sort | differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85394-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leducalexandre differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT chaounisamia differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT pouzouletfrederic differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT demarziludovic differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT megninchanetfrederique differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT correerwan differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT stefandinu differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT habrandjeanlouis differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT sichelfrancois differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams AT laurentcarine differentialnormalskintranscriptomicresponseintotalbodyirradiatedmiceexposedtoscatteredversusscannedprotonbeams |