Cargando…

Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that atrial fibrillation (AF) may contribute to impairment of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). However, the difference of BRS between patients with persistent AF (PeAF) and those with paroxysmal AF (PAF) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that patients with PeAF have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyoshi, Miho, Kondo, Hidekazu, Ishii, Yumi, Shinohara, Tetsuji, Yonezu, Keisuke, Harada, Taisuke, Sato, Hiroki, Yano, Yudai, Yoshimura, Seiichiro, Abe, Ichitaro, Shuto, Takashi, Akioka, Hidefumi, Teshima, Yasushi, Wada, Tomoyuki, Yufu, Kunio, Nakagawa, Mikiko, Anai, Hirofumi, Miyamoto, Shinji, Takahashi, Naohiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018019
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: It has been reported that atrial fibrillation (AF) may contribute to impairment of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). However, the difference of BRS between patients with persistent AF (PeAF) and those with paroxysmal AF (PAF) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that patients with PeAF have a more impaired BRS compared with those with PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 2015 onwards, a total of 67 patients (14 women [20.9%]; mean age 65.2±10.1 years) with PAF (n=46, 68.7%) and PeAF (n=21, 31.3%), who underwent catheter ablation, were prospectively enrolled. The baseline BRS was evaluated during sinus rhythm. The baseline BRS in patients with PeAF was significantly lower than those with PAF (2.97 [0.52–6.62] ms/mm Hg versus 4.70 [2.36–8.37] ms/mm Hg, P=0.047). The BRS was significantly depressed after catheter ablation in all the patients (4.66 [1.80–7.37] ms/mm Hg versus 0.55 [−0.15 to 1.22] ms/mm Hg, P<0.001). However, the depression of BRS because of catheter ablation appeared attenuated in patients with PeAF when compared with those with PAF. The number of patients who did not show depression of BRS was significantly greater, that is, patients with PeAF (3/12, 25%) than those with PAF (0/46, 0%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that the baseline BRS was more depressed in patients with PeAF compared with PAF. Catheter ablation depressed BRS irrespective of the type of AF, with a greater effect in patients with PAF than PeAF.