Cargando…
Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic strain pattern (ESP) has recently been associated with increased adverse outcome in aortic stenosis and after surgical aortic valve replacement. Our study sought to determine the impact and incremental value of ESP pattern in predicting adverse outcome after transcat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33459031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014481 |
_version_ | 1783664252269101056 |
---|---|
author | Heger, Joé Trimaille, Antonin Kibler, Marion Marchandot, Benjamin Peillex, Marilou Carmona, Adrien Matsushita, Kensuke Trinh, Annie Reydel, Antje Zeyons, Floriane Petit‐Eisenmann, Hélène Jesel, Laurence Ohlmann, Patrick Morel, Olivier |
author_facet | Heger, Joé Trimaille, Antonin Kibler, Marion Marchandot, Benjamin Peillex, Marilou Carmona, Adrien Matsushita, Kensuke Trinh, Annie Reydel, Antje Zeyons, Floriane Petit‐Eisenmann, Hélène Jesel, Laurence Ohlmann, Patrick Morel, Olivier |
author_sort | Heger, Joé |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic strain pattern (ESP) has recently been associated with increased adverse outcome in aortic stenosis and after surgical aortic valve replacement. Our study sought to determine the impact and incremental value of ESP pattern in predicting adverse outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 585 patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean age, 83±7 years; men, 39.8%) were enrolled for transcatheter aortic valve replacement from November 2012 to May 2018. ESP was defined as ≥1‐mm concave down‐sloping ST‐segment depression and asymmetrical T‐wave inversion in the lateral leads. The primary end points of the study were all‐cause mortality, rehospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A total of 178 (30.4%) patients were excluded because of left bundle‐branch block (n=103) or right bundle‐branch block (n=75). Among the 407 remaining patients, 106 had ESP (26.04%). At a median follow‐up of 20.00 months (11.70–29.42 months), no impact of electric strain on overall and cardiac death could be established. By contrast, incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure was significantly higher (33/106 [31.1%] versus 33/301 [11%]; P<0.001) in patients with ESP. By multivariate analyses, ESP remained a strong predictor of rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 2.75 [95% CI, 1.61–4.67]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aortic stenosis who were eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, ESP is frequent and associated with an increased risk of postinterventional heart failure regardless of preoperative left ventricular hypertrophy. ESP represents an easy, objective, reliable, and low‐cost tool to identify patients who may benefit from intensified postinterventional follow‐up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7955442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79554422021-03-17 Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Heger, Joé Trimaille, Antonin Kibler, Marion Marchandot, Benjamin Peillex, Marilou Carmona, Adrien Matsushita, Kensuke Trinh, Annie Reydel, Antje Zeyons, Floriane Petit‐Eisenmann, Hélène Jesel, Laurence Ohlmann, Patrick Morel, Olivier J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic strain pattern (ESP) has recently been associated with increased adverse outcome in aortic stenosis and after surgical aortic valve replacement. Our study sought to determine the impact and incremental value of ESP pattern in predicting adverse outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 585 patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean age, 83±7 years; men, 39.8%) were enrolled for transcatheter aortic valve replacement from November 2012 to May 2018. ESP was defined as ≥1‐mm concave down‐sloping ST‐segment depression and asymmetrical T‐wave inversion in the lateral leads. The primary end points of the study were all‐cause mortality, rehospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A total of 178 (30.4%) patients were excluded because of left bundle‐branch block (n=103) or right bundle‐branch block (n=75). Among the 407 remaining patients, 106 had ESP (26.04%). At a median follow‐up of 20.00 months (11.70–29.42 months), no impact of electric strain on overall and cardiac death could be established. By contrast, incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure was significantly higher (33/106 [31.1%] versus 33/301 [11%]; P<0.001) in patients with ESP. By multivariate analyses, ESP remained a strong predictor of rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 2.75 [95% CI, 1.61–4.67]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aortic stenosis who were eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, ESP is frequent and associated with an increased risk of postinterventional heart failure regardless of preoperative left ventricular hypertrophy. ESP represents an easy, objective, reliable, and low‐cost tool to identify patients who may benefit from intensified postinterventional follow‐up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7955442/ /pubmed/33459031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014481 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Heger, Joé Trimaille, Antonin Kibler, Marion Marchandot, Benjamin Peillex, Marilou Carmona, Adrien Matsushita, Kensuke Trinh, Annie Reydel, Antje Zeyons, Floriane Petit‐Eisenmann, Hélène Jesel, Laurence Ohlmann, Patrick Morel, Olivier Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title | Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_full | Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_fullStr | Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_short | Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern Is a Major Determinant of Rehospitalization for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_sort | electrocardiographic strain pattern is a major determinant of rehospitalization for heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33459031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegerjoe electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT trimailleantonin electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT kiblermarion electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT marchandotbenjamin electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT peillexmarilou electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT carmonaadrien electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT matsushitakensuke electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT trinhannie electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT reydelantje electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT zeyonsfloriane electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT petiteisenmannhelene electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT jesellaurence electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT ohlmannpatrick electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT morelolivier electrocardiographicstrainpatternisamajordeterminantofrehospitalizationforheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |