Cargando…

Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter‐based AF ablation have lower success rates than those with paroxysmal AF. We compared healthcare use and clinical outcomes between patients according to their AF subtypes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Andrew C. T., Wijeysundera, Harindra C., Qiu, Feng, Henning, Kayley, Ahmad, Kamran, Angaran, Paul, Birnie, David H., Crystal, Eugene, Ha, Andrew H., Healey, Jeff S., Leong‐Sit, Peter, Makanjee, Bhavanesh, Nery, Pablo B., Redfearn, Damian P., Skanes, Allan C., Verma, Atul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016071
_version_ 1783664259711893504
author Ha, Andrew C. T.
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Qiu, Feng
Henning, Kayley
Ahmad, Kamran
Angaran, Paul
Birnie, David H.
Crystal, Eugene
Ha, Andrew H.
Healey, Jeff S.
Leong‐Sit, Peter
Makanjee, Bhavanesh
Nery, Pablo B.
Redfearn, Damian P.
Skanes, Allan C.
Verma, Atul
author_facet Ha, Andrew C. T.
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Qiu, Feng
Henning, Kayley
Ahmad, Kamran
Angaran, Paul
Birnie, David H.
Crystal, Eugene
Ha, Andrew H.
Healey, Jeff S.
Leong‐Sit, Peter
Makanjee, Bhavanesh
Nery, Pablo B.
Redfearn, Damian P.
Skanes, Allan C.
Verma, Atul
author_sort Ha, Andrew C. T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter‐based AF ablation have lower success rates than those with paroxysmal AF. We compared healthcare use and clinical outcomes between patients according to their AF subtypes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively identified from a population‐based registry in Ontario, Canada. Via linkage with administrative databases, we performed a retrospective analysis comparing the following outcomes between patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF: healthcare use (defined as AF‐related hospitalizations/emergency room visits), periprocedural complications, and mortality. Multivariable Poisson modeling was performed to compare the rates of AF‐related and all‐cause hospitalizations/emergency room visits in the year before versus after ablation. Between April 2012 and March 2016, there were 3768 consecutive patients who underwent first‐time AF ablation, of whom 1040 (27.6%) had persistent AF. The mean follow‐up was 1329 days. Patients with persistent AF had higher risk of AF‐related hospitalization/emergency room visits (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09–1.34), mortality (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15–2.63), and periprocedural complications (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02–1.75) than those with paroxysmal AF. In the overall cohort, there was a 48% reduction in the rate of AF‐related hospitalization/emergency room visits in the year after versus before ablation (rate ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48–0.56). This reduction was observed for patients with paroxysmal (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.41–0.50) and persistent (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63–0.87) AF. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with persistent AF had higher risk of adverse outcomes than those with paroxysmal AF, ablation was associated with a favorable reduction in downstream AF‐related healthcare use, irrespective of AF type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7955473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79554732021-03-17 Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada Ha, Andrew C. T. Wijeysundera, Harindra C. Qiu, Feng Henning, Kayley Ahmad, Kamran Angaran, Paul Birnie, David H. Crystal, Eugene Ha, Andrew H. Healey, Jeff S. Leong‐Sit, Peter Makanjee, Bhavanesh Nery, Pablo B. Redfearn, Damian P. Skanes, Allan C. Verma, Atul J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter‐based AF ablation have lower success rates than those with paroxysmal AF. We compared healthcare use and clinical outcomes between patients according to their AF subtypes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively identified from a population‐based registry in Ontario, Canada. Via linkage with administrative databases, we performed a retrospective analysis comparing the following outcomes between patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF: healthcare use (defined as AF‐related hospitalizations/emergency room visits), periprocedural complications, and mortality. Multivariable Poisson modeling was performed to compare the rates of AF‐related and all‐cause hospitalizations/emergency room visits in the year before versus after ablation. Between April 2012 and March 2016, there were 3768 consecutive patients who underwent first‐time AF ablation, of whom 1040 (27.6%) had persistent AF. The mean follow‐up was 1329 days. Patients with persistent AF had higher risk of AF‐related hospitalization/emergency room visits (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09–1.34), mortality (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15–2.63), and periprocedural complications (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02–1.75) than those with paroxysmal AF. In the overall cohort, there was a 48% reduction in the rate of AF‐related hospitalization/emergency room visits in the year after versus before ablation (rate ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48–0.56). This reduction was observed for patients with paroxysmal (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.41–0.50) and persistent (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63–0.87) AF. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with persistent AF had higher risk of adverse outcomes than those with paroxysmal AF, ablation was associated with a favorable reduction in downstream AF‐related healthcare use, irrespective of AF type. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7955473/ /pubmed/33381975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016071 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ha, Andrew C. T.
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Qiu, Feng
Henning, Kayley
Ahmad, Kamran
Angaran, Paul
Birnie, David H.
Crystal, Eugene
Ha, Andrew H.
Healey, Jeff S.
Leong‐Sit, Peter
Makanjee, Bhavanesh
Nery, Pablo B.
Redfearn, Damian P.
Skanes, Allan C.
Verma, Atul
Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada
title Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada
title_full Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada
title_short Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter‐Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population‐Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada
title_sort differences in healthcare use between patients with persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter‐based atrial fibrillation ablation: a population‐based cohort study from ontario, canada
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016071
work_keys_str_mv AT haandrewct differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT wijeysunderaharindrac differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT qiufeng differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT henningkayley differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT ahmadkamran differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT angaranpaul differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT birniedavidh differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT crystaleugene differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT haandrewh differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT healeyjeffs differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT leongsitpeter differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT makanjeebhavanesh differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT nerypablob differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT redfearndamianp differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT skanesallanc differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada
AT vermaatul differencesinhealthcareusebetweenpatientswithpersistentandparoxysmalatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterbasedatrialfibrillationablationapopulationbasedcohortstudyfromontariocanada