Cargando…
Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
BACKGROUND: The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial failed to show a reduction in hard clinical end points with an early invasive strategy in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, the influence of left main disease an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018104 |
_version_ | 1783664265526247424 |
---|---|
author | Bainey, Kevin R. Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Welsh, Robert C. Kumar, Arnav King, Spencer B. Kirtane, Ajay J. |
author_facet | Bainey, Kevin R. Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Welsh, Robert C. Kumar, Arnav King, Spencer B. Kirtane, Ajay J. |
author_sort | Bainey, Kevin R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial failed to show a reduction in hard clinical end points with an early invasive strategy in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, the influence of left main disease and high‐risk coronary anatomy was left unaddressed. In a large angiographic disease‐based registry, we examined the modulating effect of revascularization on long‐term outcomes in anatomically high‐risk SIHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: 9016 patients with SIHD with high‐risk coronary anatomy (3 vessel disease with ≥70% stenosis in all 3 epicardial vessels or left main disease ≥50% stenosis [isolated or in combination with other disease]) were selected for study from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2016. The primary composite of all‐cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) was compared between revascularization versus conservative management. A total of 5487 (61.0%) patients received revascularization with either coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=3312) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2175), while 3529 (39.0%) patients were managed conservatively. Selection for coronary revascularization was associated with improved all‐cause death/MI as well as longer survival compared with selection for conservative management (Inverse Probability Weighted hazard ratio [IPW‐HR] 0.62; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.66; P<0.001; IPW‐HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.53–0.61; P<0.001, respectively). Similar risk reduction was noted with percutaneous coronary intervention (IPW‐HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59–0.70, P<0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (IPW‐HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.66; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization in patients with SIHD with high‐risk coronary anatomy was associated with improved long‐term outcome compared with conservative therapy. As such, coronary anatomical profile should be considered when contemplating treatment for SIHD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7955498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79554982021-03-17 Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Bainey, Kevin R. Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Welsh, Robert C. Kumar, Arnav King, Spencer B. Kirtane, Ajay J. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial failed to show a reduction in hard clinical end points with an early invasive strategy in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, the influence of left main disease and high‐risk coronary anatomy was left unaddressed. In a large angiographic disease‐based registry, we examined the modulating effect of revascularization on long‐term outcomes in anatomically high‐risk SIHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: 9016 patients with SIHD with high‐risk coronary anatomy (3 vessel disease with ≥70% stenosis in all 3 epicardial vessels or left main disease ≥50% stenosis [isolated or in combination with other disease]) were selected for study from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2016. The primary composite of all‐cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) was compared between revascularization versus conservative management. A total of 5487 (61.0%) patients received revascularization with either coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=3312) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2175), while 3529 (39.0%) patients were managed conservatively. Selection for coronary revascularization was associated with improved all‐cause death/MI as well as longer survival compared with selection for conservative management (Inverse Probability Weighted hazard ratio [IPW‐HR] 0.62; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.66; P<0.001; IPW‐HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.53–0.61; P<0.001, respectively). Similar risk reduction was noted with percutaneous coronary intervention (IPW‐HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59–0.70, P<0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (IPW‐HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.66; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization in patients with SIHD with high‐risk coronary anatomy was associated with improved long‐term outcome compared with conservative therapy. As such, coronary anatomical profile should be considered when contemplating treatment for SIHD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7955498/ /pubmed/33342230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018104 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bainey, Kevin R. Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Welsh, Robert C. Kumar, Arnav King, Spencer B. Kirtane, Ajay J. Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
title | Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
title_full | Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
title_fullStr | Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
title_short | Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High‐Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease |
title_sort | long‐term clinical outcomes following revascularization in high‐risk coronary anatomy patients with stable ischemic heart disease |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baineykevinr longtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingrevascularizationinhighriskcoronaryanatomypatientswithstableischemicheartdisease AT alemayehuwendimagegn longtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingrevascularizationinhighriskcoronaryanatomypatientswithstableischemicheartdisease AT welshrobertc longtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingrevascularizationinhighriskcoronaryanatomypatientswithstableischemicheartdisease AT kumararnav longtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingrevascularizationinhighriskcoronaryanatomypatientswithstableischemicheartdisease AT kingspencerb longtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingrevascularizationinhighriskcoronaryanatomypatientswithstableischemicheartdisease AT kirtaneajayj longtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingrevascularizationinhighriskcoronaryanatomypatientswithstableischemicheartdisease |