Cargando…

Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) variability has reportedly been a risk factor for various clinical events. To clarify the influence of BP visit‐to‐visit variability on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a post hoc analysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry was performed. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodani, Eitaro, Inoue, Hiroshi, Atarashi, Hirotsugu, Okumura, Ken, Yamashita, Takeshi, Otsuka, Toshiaki, Origasa, Hideki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33372541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018585
_version_ 1783664266256056320
author Kodani, Eitaro
Inoue, Hiroshi
Atarashi, Hirotsugu
Okumura, Ken
Yamashita, Takeshi
Otsuka, Toshiaki
Origasa, Hideki
author_facet Kodani, Eitaro
Inoue, Hiroshi
Atarashi, Hirotsugu
Okumura, Ken
Yamashita, Takeshi
Otsuka, Toshiaki
Origasa, Hideki
author_sort Kodani, Eitaro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) variability has reportedly been a risk factor for various clinical events. To clarify the influence of BP visit‐to‐visit variability on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a post hoc analysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry was performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 7406 outpatients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from 158 institutions, 7226 (age, 69.7±9.9 years; men, 70.7%), in whom BP was measured 4 times or more (14.6±5.0 times) during the 2‐year follow‐up period or until occurrence of an event, constituted the study group. SD and coefficient of variation of BP values were calculated as BP variability. Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all‐cause death occurred in 110 (1.5%), 121 (1.7%), and 168 (2.3%) patients, respectively. When patients were divided into quartiles of systolic BP‐SD (<8.20, 8.20–10.49, 10.50–13.19, and ≥13.20 mm Hg), hazard ratios (HRs) for all adverse events were significantly high in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile (HR, 2.00, 95% CI, 1.15–3.49, P=0.015 for thromboembolism; HR, 2.60, 95% CI, 1.36–4.97, P=0.004 for major hemorrhage; and HR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.11–3.07, P=0.018 for all‐cause death) after adjusting for components of the CHA(2)DS(2)‐VASc score, warfarin and antiplatelet use, atrial fibrillation type, BP measurement times, and others. These findings were consistent when BP‐coefficient of variation was used instead of BP‐SD. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic BP visit‐to‐visit variability was significantly associated with all adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to clarify the causality between BP variability and adverse outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique Identifier: UMIN000001569.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7955501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79555012021-03-17 Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry Kodani, Eitaro Inoue, Hiroshi Atarashi, Hirotsugu Okumura, Ken Yamashita, Takeshi Otsuka, Toshiaki Origasa, Hideki J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) variability has reportedly been a risk factor for various clinical events. To clarify the influence of BP visit‐to‐visit variability on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a post hoc analysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry was performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 7406 outpatients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from 158 institutions, 7226 (age, 69.7±9.9 years; men, 70.7%), in whom BP was measured 4 times or more (14.6±5.0 times) during the 2‐year follow‐up period or until occurrence of an event, constituted the study group. SD and coefficient of variation of BP values were calculated as BP variability. Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all‐cause death occurred in 110 (1.5%), 121 (1.7%), and 168 (2.3%) patients, respectively. When patients were divided into quartiles of systolic BP‐SD (<8.20, 8.20–10.49, 10.50–13.19, and ≥13.20 mm Hg), hazard ratios (HRs) for all adverse events were significantly high in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile (HR, 2.00, 95% CI, 1.15–3.49, P=0.015 for thromboembolism; HR, 2.60, 95% CI, 1.36–4.97, P=0.004 for major hemorrhage; and HR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.11–3.07, P=0.018 for all‐cause death) after adjusting for components of the CHA(2)DS(2)‐VASc score, warfarin and antiplatelet use, atrial fibrillation type, BP measurement times, and others. These findings were consistent when BP‐coefficient of variation was used instead of BP‐SD. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic BP visit‐to‐visit variability was significantly associated with all adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to clarify the causality between BP variability and adverse outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique Identifier: UMIN000001569. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7955501/ /pubmed/33372541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018585 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kodani, Eitaro
Inoue, Hiroshi
Atarashi, Hirotsugu
Okumura, Ken
Yamashita, Takeshi
Otsuka, Toshiaki
Origasa, Hideki
Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry
title Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry
title_full Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry
title_fullStr Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry
title_short Impact of Blood Pressure Visit‐to‐Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J‐RHYTHM Registry
title_sort impact of blood pressure visit‐to‐visit variability on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: subanalysis of the j‐rhythm registry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33372541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018585
work_keys_str_mv AT kodanieitaro impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT inouehiroshi impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT atarashihirotsugu impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT okumuraken impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT yamashitatakeshi impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT otsukatoshiaki impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT origasahideki impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry
AT impactofbloodpressurevisittovisitvariabilityonadverseeventsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationsubanalysisofthejrhythmregistry