Cargando…

Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer

BACKGROUND: Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially the vitrification, freeze all strategy has become more acceptable than ever. Some studies have found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer(ET)in gonadotropin releas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Xiaoyan, Yang, Jingwei, Li, Lan, Yang, Na, Lan, Ling, Huang, Guoning, Ye, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03698-5
_version_ 1783664283004960768
author Ding, Xiaoyan
Yang, Jingwei
Li, Lan
Yang, Na
Lan, Ling
Huang, Guoning
Ye, Hong
author_facet Ding, Xiaoyan
Yang, Jingwei
Li, Lan
Yang, Na
Lan, Ling
Huang, Guoning
Ye, Hong
author_sort Ding, Xiaoyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially the vitrification, freeze all strategy has become more acceptable than ever. Some studies have found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer(ET)in gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. However from our literature research, there have been no reports about live birth rate comparison between fresh ET and FET with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether patients benefit from freeze all strategy in GnRH-a protocol using real-world data. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, in which women undergoing fresh ET or FET with GnRH-a long protocol at Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute from January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy rate. RESULTS: A total of 7,814 patients met inclusion criteria, implementing 5,216 fresh ET cycles and 2,598 FET cycles, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were significantly different between fresh ET and FET groups, except BMI. After controlling for a broad range of potential confounders including age, infertility duration, BMI, AMH, number of oocytes retrieved and of available embryos, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate between two groups (all P > 0.05). However, the implantation rate and live birth rate in fresh ET group were significantly higher than FET group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Under GnRH-a long protocol, compared to FET, fresh ET was associated with higher implantation rate and live birth rate in infertile patients that underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). The freeze all strategy should be individualized and made with caution especially with GnRH-a long protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7955631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79556312021-03-15 Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer Ding, Xiaoyan Yang, Jingwei Li, Lan Yang, Na Lan, Ling Huang, Guoning Ye, Hong BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially the vitrification, freeze all strategy has become more acceptable than ever. Some studies have found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer(ET)in gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. However from our literature research, there have been no reports about live birth rate comparison between fresh ET and FET with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether patients benefit from freeze all strategy in GnRH-a protocol using real-world data. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, in which women undergoing fresh ET or FET with GnRH-a long protocol at Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute from January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy rate. RESULTS: A total of 7,814 patients met inclusion criteria, implementing 5,216 fresh ET cycles and 2,598 FET cycles, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were significantly different between fresh ET and FET groups, except BMI. After controlling for a broad range of potential confounders including age, infertility duration, BMI, AMH, number of oocytes retrieved and of available embryos, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate between two groups (all P > 0.05). However, the implantation rate and live birth rate in fresh ET group were significantly higher than FET group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Under GnRH-a long protocol, compared to FET, fresh ET was associated with higher implantation rate and live birth rate in infertile patients that underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). The freeze all strategy should be individualized and made with caution especially with GnRH-a long protocol. BioMed Central 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7955631/ /pubmed/33711956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03698-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ding, Xiaoyan
Yang, Jingwei
Li, Lan
Yang, Na
Lan, Ling
Huang, Guoning
Ye, Hong
Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
title Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
title_full Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
title_fullStr Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
title_full_unstemmed Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
title_short Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
title_sort fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03698-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dingxiaoyan fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer
AT yangjingwei fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer
AT lilan fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer
AT yangna fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer
AT lanling fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer
AT huangguoning fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer
AT yehong fertilityoutcomesinwomenaftercontrolledovarianstimulationwithgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistlongprotocolfreshversusfrozenembryotransfer