Cargando…
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been successfully applied to the treatment of gastric, colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage, and there is still no strong evidence-based medical evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727861 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S291085 |
_version_ | 1783664301403275264 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Qingchao Zhu, Yihao Xiong, Huan Sheng, Xiangzong Hu, Zhiqiao Hu, Hanqing Huang, Rui Zhang, Qian Yuan, Ziming Xie, Lei Gao, Zhifeng Wang, Yuliuming Wang, Guiyu Wang, Xishan |
author_facet | Tang, Qingchao Zhu, Yihao Xiong, Huan Sheng, Xiangzong Hu, Zhiqiao Hu, Hanqing Huang, Rui Zhang, Qian Yuan, Ziming Xie, Lei Gao, Zhifeng Wang, Yuliuming Wang, Guiyu Wang, Xishan |
author_sort | Tang, Qingchao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been successfully applied to the treatment of gastric, colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage, and there is still no strong evidence-based medical evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2017, consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent transluminal resection, anastomosis, and specimen extraction and those who underwent conventional laparoscopic resection were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to align clinicopathological features between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients were eventually included in this study, 186 in each group. According to perioperative information and postoperative follow-up in both groups, the NOSES group had less blood loss (P = 0.011), shorter time to recovery of gastrointestinal function (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.037). The NOSES group had fewer postoperative analgesics (P < 0.001), lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.001), and lower incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.017). Compared with the LA (laparoscopic) group, the NOSES group had better physical function (P<0.05), role function (P<0.001), emotional function (P<0.001) and global health status than LA group, while symptoms such as pain (P<0.001), insomnia (P<0.001), constipation (P<0.001) and diarrhea (P<0.05) were less severe in the NOSES group. In addition, the NOSES group had higher body image scores. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, NOSES has advantages in reducing postoperative pain, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative quality of life, and improving patients’ satisfaction with abdominal wall aesthetics. There was no difference in long-term survival between NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7955728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79557282021-03-15 Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study Tang, Qingchao Zhu, Yihao Xiong, Huan Sheng, Xiangzong Hu, Zhiqiao Hu, Hanqing Huang, Rui Zhang, Qian Yuan, Ziming Xie, Lei Gao, Zhifeng Wang, Yuliuming Wang, Guiyu Wang, Xishan Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been successfully applied to the treatment of gastric, colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage, and there is still no strong evidence-based medical evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2017, consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent transluminal resection, anastomosis, and specimen extraction and those who underwent conventional laparoscopic resection were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to align clinicopathological features between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients were eventually included in this study, 186 in each group. According to perioperative information and postoperative follow-up in both groups, the NOSES group had less blood loss (P = 0.011), shorter time to recovery of gastrointestinal function (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.037). The NOSES group had fewer postoperative analgesics (P < 0.001), lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.001), and lower incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.017). Compared with the LA (laparoscopic) group, the NOSES group had better physical function (P<0.05), role function (P<0.001), emotional function (P<0.001) and global health status than LA group, while symptoms such as pain (P<0.001), insomnia (P<0.001), constipation (P<0.001) and diarrhea (P<0.05) were less severe in the NOSES group. In addition, the NOSES group had higher body image scores. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, NOSES has advantages in reducing postoperative pain, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative quality of life, and improving patients’ satisfaction with abdominal wall aesthetics. There was no difference in long-term survival between NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Dove 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7955728/ /pubmed/33727861 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S291085 Text en © 2021 Tang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tang, Qingchao Zhu, Yihao Xiong, Huan Sheng, Xiangzong Hu, Zhiqiao Hu, Hanqing Huang, Rui Zhang, Qian Yuan, Ziming Xie, Lei Gao, Zhifeng Wang, Yuliuming Wang, Guiyu Wang, Xishan Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study |
title | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study |
title_full | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study |
title_fullStr | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study |
title_short | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study |
title_sort | natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727861 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S291085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangqingchao naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhuyihao naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT xionghuan naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT shengxiangzong naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT huzhiqiao naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT huhanqing naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT huangrui naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhangqian naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT yuanziming naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT xielei naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT gaozhifeng naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangyuliuming naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangguiyu naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangxishan naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy |