Cargando…

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been successfully applied to the treatment of gastric, colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage, and there is still no strong evidence-based medical evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Qingchao, Zhu, Yihao, Xiong, Huan, Sheng, Xiangzong, Hu, Zhiqiao, Hu, Hanqing, Huang, Rui, Zhang, Qian, Yuan, Ziming, Xie, Lei, Gao, Zhifeng, Wang, Yuliuming, Wang, Guiyu, Wang, Xishan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727861
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S291085
_version_ 1783664301403275264
author Tang, Qingchao
Zhu, Yihao
Xiong, Huan
Sheng, Xiangzong
Hu, Zhiqiao
Hu, Hanqing
Huang, Rui
Zhang, Qian
Yuan, Ziming
Xie, Lei
Gao, Zhifeng
Wang, Yuliuming
Wang, Guiyu
Wang, Xishan
author_facet Tang, Qingchao
Zhu, Yihao
Xiong, Huan
Sheng, Xiangzong
Hu, Zhiqiao
Hu, Hanqing
Huang, Rui
Zhang, Qian
Yuan, Ziming
Xie, Lei
Gao, Zhifeng
Wang, Yuliuming
Wang, Guiyu
Wang, Xishan
author_sort Tang, Qingchao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been successfully applied to the treatment of gastric, colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage, and there is still no strong evidence-based medical evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2017, consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent transluminal resection, anastomosis, and specimen extraction and those who underwent conventional laparoscopic resection were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to align clinicopathological features between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients were eventually included in this study, 186 in each group. According to perioperative information and postoperative follow-up in both groups, the NOSES group had less blood loss (P = 0.011), shorter time to recovery of gastrointestinal function (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.037). The NOSES group had fewer postoperative analgesics (P < 0.001), lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.001), and lower incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.017). Compared with the LA (laparoscopic) group, the NOSES group had better physical function (P<0.05), role function (P<0.001), emotional function (P<0.001) and global health status than LA group, while symptoms such as pain (P<0.001), insomnia (P<0.001), constipation (P<0.001) and diarrhea (P<0.05) were less severe in the NOSES group. In addition, the NOSES group had higher body image scores. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, NOSES has advantages in reducing postoperative pain, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative quality of life, and improving patients’ satisfaction with abdominal wall aesthetics. There was no difference in long-term survival between NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7955728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79557282021-03-15 Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study Tang, Qingchao Zhu, Yihao Xiong, Huan Sheng, Xiangzong Hu, Zhiqiao Hu, Hanqing Huang, Rui Zhang, Qian Yuan, Ziming Xie, Lei Gao, Zhifeng Wang, Yuliuming Wang, Guiyu Wang, Xishan Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has been successfully applied to the treatment of gastric, colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage, and there is still no strong evidence-based medical evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2017, consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent transluminal resection, anastomosis, and specimen extraction and those who underwent conventional laparoscopic resection were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to align clinicopathological features between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients were eventually included in this study, 186 in each group. According to perioperative information and postoperative follow-up in both groups, the NOSES group had less blood loss (P = 0.011), shorter time to recovery of gastrointestinal function (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.037). The NOSES group had fewer postoperative analgesics (P < 0.001), lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.001), and lower incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.017). Compared with the LA (laparoscopic) group, the NOSES group had better physical function (P<0.05), role function (P<0.001), emotional function (P<0.001) and global health status than LA group, while symptoms such as pain (P<0.001), insomnia (P<0.001), constipation (P<0.001) and diarrhea (P<0.05) were less severe in the NOSES group. In addition, the NOSES group had higher body image scores. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, NOSES has advantages in reducing postoperative pain, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative quality of life, and improving patients’ satisfaction with abdominal wall aesthetics. There was no difference in long-term survival between NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Dove 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7955728/ /pubmed/33727861 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S291085 Text en © 2021 Tang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tang, Qingchao
Zhu, Yihao
Xiong, Huan
Sheng, Xiangzong
Hu, Zhiqiao
Hu, Hanqing
Huang, Rui
Zhang, Qian
Yuan, Ziming
Xie, Lei
Gao, Zhifeng
Wang, Yuliuming
Wang, Guiyu
Wang, Xishan
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
title Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
title_full Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
title_fullStr Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
title_full_unstemmed Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
title_short Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
title_sort natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7955728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727861
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S291085
work_keys_str_mv AT tangqingchao naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhuyihao naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT xionghuan naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT shengxiangzong naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT huzhiqiao naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT huhanqing naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT huangrui naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhangqian naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yuanziming naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT xielei naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT gaozhifeng naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wangyuliuming naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wangguiyu naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wangxishan naturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicassistedresectioninthetreatmentofcolorectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy