Cargando…
Internal Stress Prediction and Measurement of Mid-Infrared Multilayer Thin Films
We present an experimental method for evaluating interfacial force per width and predicting internal stress in mid-infrared band-pass filters (MIR-BPF). The interfacial force per width between the two kinds of thin-film materials was obtained by experimental measurement values, and the residual stre...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14051101 |
Sumario: | We present an experimental method for evaluating interfacial force per width and predicting internal stress in mid-infrared band-pass filters (MIR-BPF). The interfacial force per width between the two kinds of thin-film materials was obtained by experimental measurement values, and the residual stress of the multilayer thin films was predicted by the modified Ennos formula. A dual electron beam evaporation system combined with ion-assisted deposition was used to fabricate mid-infrared band-pass filters. The interfacial forces per width for Ge/SiO(2) and SiO(2)/Ge were 124.9 N/m and 127.6 N/m, respectively. The difference between the measured stress and predicted stress in the 23-layer MIR-BPF was below 0.059 GPa. The residual stresses of the four-layer film, as well as the 20-layer and 23-layer mid-infrared band-pass filter, were predicted by adding the interface stress to the modified Ennos formula. In the four-layer film, the difference between the predicted value and the measured stress of the HL (high–low refractive index) and LH (low–high refractive index) stacks were −0.384 GPa for (HL)(2) and −0.436 GPa for (LH)(2), respectively. The predicted stress and the measured stress of the 20-layer mid-infrared filter were −0.316 GPa and −0.250 GPa. The predicted stress and the measured stress of the 23-layer mid-infrared filter were −0.257 GPa and −0.198 GPa, respectively. |
---|