Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors
This paper attempts to compare three methods of testing floor slip resistance and the resulting classifications. Polished, flamed, brushed, and grained granite slabs were tested. The acceptance angle values (α(ob)) obtained through the shod ramp test, slip resistance value (SRV), and sliding frictio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673469 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14051108 |
_version_ | 1783664458454794240 |
---|---|
author | Sudoł, Ewa Szewczak, Ewa Małek, Marcin |
author_facet | Sudoł, Ewa Szewczak, Ewa Małek, Marcin |
author_sort | Sudoł, Ewa |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper attempts to compare three methods of testing floor slip resistance and the resulting classifications. Polished, flamed, brushed, and grained granite slabs were tested. The acceptance angle values (α(ob)) obtained through the shod ramp test, slip resistance value (SRV), and sliding friction coefficient (μ) were compared in terms of the correlation between the series, the precision of each method, and the classification results assigned to each of the three obtained indices. It was found that the evaluation of a product for slip resistance was strongly related to the test method used and the resulting classification method. This influence was particularly pronounced for low roughness slabs. This would result in risks associated with inadequate assessments, which could affect the safe use of buildings facilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7956536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79565362021-03-16 Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors Sudoł, Ewa Szewczak, Ewa Małek, Marcin Materials (Basel) Article This paper attempts to compare three methods of testing floor slip resistance and the resulting classifications. Polished, flamed, brushed, and grained granite slabs were tested. The acceptance angle values (α(ob)) obtained through the shod ramp test, slip resistance value (SRV), and sliding friction coefficient (μ) were compared in terms of the correlation between the series, the precision of each method, and the classification results assigned to each of the three obtained indices. It was found that the evaluation of a product for slip resistance was strongly related to the test method used and the resulting classification method. This influence was particularly pronounced for low roughness slabs. This would result in risks associated with inadequate assessments, which could affect the safe use of buildings facilities. MDPI 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7956536/ /pubmed/33673469 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14051108 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sudoł, Ewa Szewczak, Ewa Małek, Marcin Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors |
title | Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors |
title_sort | comparative analysis of slip resistance test methods for granite floors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673469 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14051108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sudołewa comparativeanalysisofslipresistancetestmethodsforgranitefloors AT szewczakewa comparativeanalysisofslipresistancetestmethodsforgranitefloors AT małekmarcin comparativeanalysisofslipresistancetestmethodsforgranitefloors |