Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnograph...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051562 |
_version_ | 1783664484245569536 |
---|---|
author | Imtiaz, Syed Anas |
author_facet | Imtiaz, Syed Anas |
author_sort | Imtiaz, Syed Anas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnography (PSG), whereas others have demonstrated the feasibility of using alternative sensing modalities. In this paper, a systematic review of the different sensing modalities that have been used for wearable sleep staging is presented. Based on a review of 90 papers, 13 different sensing modalities are identified. Each sensing modality is explored to identify signals that can be obtained from it, the sleep stages that can be reliably identified, the classification accuracy of systems and methods using the sensing modality, as well as the usability constraints of the sensor in a wearable system. It concludes that the two most common sensing modalities in use are those based on electroencephalography (EEG) and photoplethysmography (PPG). EEG-based systems are the most accurate, with EEG being the only sensing modality capable of identifying all the stages of sleep. PPG-based systems are much simpler to use and better suited for wearable monitoring but are unable to identify all the sleep stages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7956647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79566472021-03-16 A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging Imtiaz, Syed Anas Sensors (Basel) Review Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnography (PSG), whereas others have demonstrated the feasibility of using alternative sensing modalities. In this paper, a systematic review of the different sensing modalities that have been used for wearable sleep staging is presented. Based on a review of 90 papers, 13 different sensing modalities are identified. Each sensing modality is explored to identify signals that can be obtained from it, the sleep stages that can be reliably identified, the classification accuracy of systems and methods using the sensing modality, as well as the usability constraints of the sensor in a wearable system. It concludes that the two most common sensing modalities in use are those based on electroencephalography (EEG) and photoplethysmography (PPG). EEG-based systems are the most accurate, with EEG being the only sensing modality capable of identifying all the stages of sleep. PPG-based systems are much simpler to use and better suited for wearable monitoring but are unable to identify all the sleep stages. MDPI 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7956647/ /pubmed/33668118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051562 Text en © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Imtiaz, Syed Anas A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging |
title | A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging |
title_sort | systematic review of sensing technologies for wearable sleep staging |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imtiazsyedanas asystematicreviewofsensingtechnologiesforwearablesleepstaging AT imtiazsyedanas systematicreviewofsensingtechnologiesforwearablesleepstaging |