Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging

Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Imtiaz, Syed Anas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051562
_version_ 1783664484245569536
author Imtiaz, Syed Anas
author_facet Imtiaz, Syed Anas
author_sort Imtiaz, Syed Anas
collection PubMed
description Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnography (PSG), whereas others have demonstrated the feasibility of using alternative sensing modalities. In this paper, a systematic review of the different sensing modalities that have been used for wearable sleep staging is presented. Based on a review of 90 papers, 13 different sensing modalities are identified. Each sensing modality is explored to identify signals that can be obtained from it, the sleep stages that can be reliably identified, the classification accuracy of systems and methods using the sensing modality, as well as the usability constraints of the sensor in a wearable system. It concludes that the two most common sensing modalities in use are those based on electroencephalography (EEG) and photoplethysmography (PPG). EEG-based systems are the most accurate, with EEG being the only sensing modality capable of identifying all the stages of sleep. PPG-based systems are much simpler to use and better suited for wearable monitoring but are unable to identify all the sleep stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7956647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79566472021-03-16 A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging Imtiaz, Syed Anas Sensors (Basel) Review Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnography (PSG), whereas others have demonstrated the feasibility of using alternative sensing modalities. In this paper, a systematic review of the different sensing modalities that have been used for wearable sleep staging is presented. Based on a review of 90 papers, 13 different sensing modalities are identified. Each sensing modality is explored to identify signals that can be obtained from it, the sleep stages that can be reliably identified, the classification accuracy of systems and methods using the sensing modality, as well as the usability constraints of the sensor in a wearable system. It concludes that the two most common sensing modalities in use are those based on electroencephalography (EEG) and photoplethysmography (PPG). EEG-based systems are the most accurate, with EEG being the only sensing modality capable of identifying all the stages of sleep. PPG-based systems are much simpler to use and better suited for wearable monitoring but are unable to identify all the sleep stages. MDPI 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7956647/ /pubmed/33668118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051562 Text en © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Imtiaz, Syed Anas
A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
title A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
title_full A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
title_short A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging
title_sort systematic review of sensing technologies for wearable sleep staging
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051562
work_keys_str_mv AT imtiazsyedanas asystematicreviewofsensingtechnologiesforwearablesleepstaging
AT imtiazsyedanas systematicreviewofsensingtechnologiesforwearablesleepstaging