Cargando…

Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend against combining potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor or prasugrel) with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, but the evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casula, Matteo, Fortuni, Federico, Ferlini, Marco, Fabris, Francesca, Oltrona Visconti, Luigi, Leonardi, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32895853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-020-00436-8
_version_ 1783664547270230016
author Casula, Matteo
Fortuni, Federico
Ferlini, Marco
Fabris, Francesca
Oltrona Visconti, Luigi
Leonardi, Sergio
author_facet Casula, Matteo
Fortuni, Federico
Ferlini, Marco
Fabris, Francesca
Oltrona Visconti, Luigi
Leonardi, Sergio
author_sort Casula, Matteo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend against combining potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor or prasugrel) with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, but the evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors with clopidogrel in patients receiving OAC therapy for AF after a recent PCI. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting outcomes according to the P2Y(12) inhibitor used. Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were the safety endpoints, while the efficacy outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor were compared with clopidogrel. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences between patients treated with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) versus triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). RESULTS: Four RCTs that included 10,057 patients were included in this analysis. Potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors were associated with a significant increase in major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with clopidogrel (risk ratio [RR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.59, p = 0.01; number needed to harm 18, 95% CI 12–36). This finding was consistent regardless of the concomitant antithrombotic therapy (DAT vs. TAT; p = 0.69). The risk of MACE did not differ between potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors and clopidogrel (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57–1.82). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving OAC therapy for AF after a recent PCI, potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors increase the risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared with clopidogrel, with no evident benefit in terms of MACE reduction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-020-00436-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7956939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79569392021-03-28 Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Casula, Matteo Fortuni, Federico Ferlini, Marco Fabris, Francesca Oltrona Visconti, Luigi Leonardi, Sergio Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend against combining potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor or prasugrel) with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, but the evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors with clopidogrel in patients receiving OAC therapy for AF after a recent PCI. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting outcomes according to the P2Y(12) inhibitor used. Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were the safety endpoints, while the efficacy outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor were compared with clopidogrel. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences between patients treated with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) versus triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). RESULTS: Four RCTs that included 10,057 patients were included in this analysis. Potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors were associated with a significant increase in major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with clopidogrel (risk ratio [RR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.59, p = 0.01; number needed to harm 18, 95% CI 12–36). This finding was consistent regardless of the concomitant antithrombotic therapy (DAT vs. TAT; p = 0.69). The risk of MACE did not differ between potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors and clopidogrel (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57–1.82). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving OAC therapy for AF after a recent PCI, potent oral P2Y(12) inhibitors increase the risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared with clopidogrel, with no evident benefit in terms of MACE reduction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-020-00436-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7956939/ /pubmed/32895853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-020-00436-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Casula, Matteo
Fortuni, Federico
Ferlini, Marco
Fabris, Francesca
Oltrona Visconti, Luigi
Leonardi, Sergio
Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Meta-Analysis Comparing Potent Oral P2Y(12) Inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort meta-analysis comparing potent oral p2y(12) inhibitors versus clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32895853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-020-00436-8
work_keys_str_mv AT casulamatteo metaanalysiscomparingpotentoralp2y12inhibitorsversusclopidogrelinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT fortunifederico metaanalysiscomparingpotentoralp2y12inhibitorsversusclopidogrelinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT ferlinimarco metaanalysiscomparingpotentoralp2y12inhibitorsversusclopidogrelinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT fabrisfrancesca metaanalysiscomparingpotentoralp2y12inhibitorsversusclopidogrelinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT oltronaviscontiluigi metaanalysiscomparingpotentoralp2y12inhibitorsversusclopidogrelinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT leonardisergio metaanalysiscomparingpotentoralp2y12inhibitorsversusclopidogrelinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention