Cargando…

Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes for brain tumor resection have been shown to be significantly improved with increased extent of resection. To achieve this, neurosurgeons employ different intra-operative tools to improve the extent of resection of brain tumors, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Yo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Huan Wee, Uff, Christopher, Chakraborty, Aabir, Dorward, Neil, Bamber, Jeffrey Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619286
_version_ 1783664551393230848
author Chan, Huan Wee
Uff, Christopher
Chakraborty, Aabir
Dorward, Neil
Bamber, Jeffrey Colin
author_facet Chan, Huan Wee
Uff, Christopher
Chakraborty, Aabir
Dorward, Neil
Bamber, Jeffrey Colin
author_sort Chan, Huan Wee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes for brain tumor resection have been shown to be significantly improved with increased extent of resection. To achieve this, neurosurgeons employ different intra-operative tools to improve the extent of resection of brain tumors, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Young’s modulus (YM) of brain tumors have been shown to be different from normal brain but the accuracy of SWE in assisting brain tumor resection has not been reported. AIMS: To determine the accuracy of SWE in detecting brain tumor residual using post-operative MRI scan as “gold standard”. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (aged 1–62 years, M:F = 15:20) with brain tumors were recruited into the study. The intraoperative SWE scans were performed using Aixplorer(®) (SuperSonic Imagine, France) using a sector transducer (SE12-3) and a linear transducer (SL15-4) with a bandwidth of 3 to 12 MHz and 4 to 15 MHz, respectively, using the SWE mode. The scans were performed prior, during and after brain tumor resection. The presence of residual tumor was determined by the surgeon, ultrasound (US) B-mode and SWE. This was compared with the presence of residual tumor on post-operative MRI scan. RESULTS: The YM of the brain tumors correlated significantly with surgeons’ findings (ρ = 0.845, p < 0.001). The sensitivities of residual tumor detection by the surgeon, US B-mode and SWE were 36%, 73%, and 94%, respectively, while their specificities were 100%, 63%, and 77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between detection of residual tumor by SWE, US B-mode, and MRI. SWE and MRI were significantly better than the surgeon’s detection of residual tumor (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SWE had a higher sensitivity in detecting residual tumor than the surgeons (94% vs. 36%). However, the surgeons had a higher specificity than SWE (100% vs. 77%). Therefore, using SWE in combination with surgeon’s opinion may optimize the detection of residual tumor, and hence improve the extent of brain tumor resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7956956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79569562021-03-16 Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection Chan, Huan Wee Uff, Christopher Chakraborty, Aabir Dorward, Neil Bamber, Jeffrey Colin Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes for brain tumor resection have been shown to be significantly improved with increased extent of resection. To achieve this, neurosurgeons employ different intra-operative tools to improve the extent of resection of brain tumors, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Young’s modulus (YM) of brain tumors have been shown to be different from normal brain but the accuracy of SWE in assisting brain tumor resection has not been reported. AIMS: To determine the accuracy of SWE in detecting brain tumor residual using post-operative MRI scan as “gold standard”. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (aged 1–62 years, M:F = 15:20) with brain tumors were recruited into the study. The intraoperative SWE scans were performed using Aixplorer(®) (SuperSonic Imagine, France) using a sector transducer (SE12-3) and a linear transducer (SL15-4) with a bandwidth of 3 to 12 MHz and 4 to 15 MHz, respectively, using the SWE mode. The scans were performed prior, during and after brain tumor resection. The presence of residual tumor was determined by the surgeon, ultrasound (US) B-mode and SWE. This was compared with the presence of residual tumor on post-operative MRI scan. RESULTS: The YM of the brain tumors correlated significantly with surgeons’ findings (ρ = 0.845, p < 0.001). The sensitivities of residual tumor detection by the surgeon, US B-mode and SWE were 36%, 73%, and 94%, respectively, while their specificities were 100%, 63%, and 77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between detection of residual tumor by SWE, US B-mode, and MRI. SWE and MRI were significantly better than the surgeon’s detection of residual tumor (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SWE had a higher sensitivity in detecting residual tumor than the surgeons (94% vs. 36%). However, the surgeons had a higher specificity than SWE (100% vs. 77%). Therefore, using SWE in combination with surgeon’s opinion may optimize the detection of residual tumor, and hence improve the extent of brain tumor resection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7956956/ /pubmed/33732645 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619286 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chan, Uff, Chakraborty, Dorward and Bamber http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chan, Huan Wee
Uff, Christopher
Chakraborty, Aabir
Dorward, Neil
Bamber, Jeffrey Colin
Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection
title Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection
title_full Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection
title_fullStr Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection
title_short Clinical Application of Shear Wave Elastography for Assisting Brain Tumor Resection
title_sort clinical application of shear wave elastography for assisting brain tumor resection
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619286
work_keys_str_mv AT chanhuanwee clinicalapplicationofshearwaveelastographyforassistingbraintumorresection
AT uffchristopher clinicalapplicationofshearwaveelastographyforassistingbraintumorresection
AT chakrabortyaabir clinicalapplicationofshearwaveelastographyforassistingbraintumorresection
AT dorwardneil clinicalapplicationofshearwaveelastographyforassistingbraintumorresection
AT bamberjeffreycolin clinicalapplicationofshearwaveelastographyforassistingbraintumorresection