ERBB1/2/3 Expression, Prognosis, and Immune Infiltration in Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND: The four ERBB tyrosine kinase family members [ERBB1 (epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR), ERBB2 (HER2), ERBB3 (HER3), and ERBB4 (HER4)] (ERBB receptor family) have been shown, according to previous studies, to be related to the cutaneous melanoma. ERBB3 is the only member of the ERBBs that lacks tyrosine kinase activity and thus needs to dimer with other tyrosine kinases receptors to trigger the signaling pathway, while ERBB3 may dimer with all members of the ERBB family. Melanoma progression depends on activation of ERBB signaling, especially the ERBB3/ERBB2 cascade. There are lymphocytes and T cell infiltrates in melanoma. Numerous pieces of evidences indicate that local immune status plays an important role in the formation of anti-tumor immune responses. However, the relationship between the ERBBs and prognosis and immune infiltration in cutaneous melanoma is not completely clear. METHODS: The expression of the ERBBs was analyzed through the Oncomine database, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), respectively. Immunohistochemistry of ERBBs was obtained from the Human Protein Atlas is increased before HPA database. ERBBs genes expression and mutation analysis in cutaneous melanoma from the cBioPortal. Functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes is increased before KEGG pathway enrichment analysis from the Metascape. Correlations between ERBBs and 31 genes that were close to each other and frequently altered were explored by GEPIA. Using the GEPIA database, we also investigated the relationship between ERBBs and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in cutaneous melanoma. The disease-free survival and different tumor stages of ERBBs were evaluated by GEPIA. The correlation of ERBBs and tumor-infiltrating immune cells and prognostic(5 years survival rates) was tested by the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER). RESULTS: In general, the expression levels of ERBB1/2 in cutaneous melanoma were lower than those in normal skin tissue. By contrast, the ERBB3 expression level was higher in cutaneous melanoma than in normal skin tissue. Low expression of ERBB1/2 and high expression of ERBB3 were detrimental to the 5 years survival of cutaneous melanoma patients (ERBB1: log-rank P: 0.03; ERBB2: log-rank P: 0.008; ERBB3: log-rank P: 0.039). ERBB4 expression may not affect the prognosis of patients with cutaneous melanoma. ERBBs may not play a role in the tumor stage and disease-free survival in cutaneous melanoma patients. The relationship between the ERBB family and 31 genes that were close to each other and frequently altered is demonstrated as the genes regulated by the ERBB family being mainly concentrated in the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. ERBB2 can induce infiltration of CD8(+) T cells and B cells, while ERBB3 can induce infiltration of CD4(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, and Neutrophil cells. ERBBs are more significantly associated with M1 macrophages, dendritic cells, Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg cellular immune markers (Cor > 0.2). ERBB2/3 were related to MDSC in cutaneous melanoma, including human mononuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC) and polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC), and may influence the progression of cutaneous melanoma through MDSC, but the conclusion needs further probing. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the prognosis and immune infiltration of the ERBB family in cutaneous melanoma. Our results suggest that ERBB1/2/3 may serve as early prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets in cutaneous melanoma.