Cargando…

Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies showed prolonged survival for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with both monotherapies and combined therapies. However, high costs limit clinical applications. Thus, we conducted this cost‐effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wen‐Qian, Li, Ling‐Yu, Chai, Jin, Cui, Jiu‐Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3733
_version_ 1783664598201663488
author Li, Wen‐Qian
Li, Ling‐Yu
Chai, Jin
Cui, Jiu‐Wei
author_facet Li, Wen‐Qian
Li, Ling‐Yu
Chai, Jin
Cui, Jiu‐Wei
author_sort Li, Wen‐Qian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recent studies showed prolonged survival for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with both monotherapies and combined therapies. However, high costs limit clinical applications. Thus, we conducted this cost‐effectiveness analysis to explore an optimal first‐line treatment for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survival data were extracted from six clinical trials, including ARCHER1050 (dacomitinib vs. gefitinib); FLAURA (osimertinib vs. gefitinib/erlotinib); JO25567 and NEJ026 (bevacizumab +erlotinib vs. erlotinib); NEJ009 (gefitinib +chemotherapy vs. gefitinib); and NCT02148380 (gefitinib +chemotherapy vs. gefitinib vs. chemotherapy) trials. Cost‐related data were obtained from hospitals and published literature. The effect parameter (quality‐adjusted life year [QALY]) was the reflection of both survival and utility. Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER), average cost‐effectiveness ratio (ACER), and net benefit were calculated, and the willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold was set at $30828/QALY from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the stability of results. RESULTS: We compared treatment groups with control groups in each trial. ICERs were $1897750.74/QALY (ARCHER1050), $416560.02/QALY (FLAURA), ‐$477607.48/QALY (JO25567), ‐$464326.66/QALY (NEJ026), ‐$277121.22/QALY (NEJ009), ‐$399360.94/QALY (gefitinib as comparison, NCT02148380), and ‐$170733.05/QALY (chemotherapy as comparison, NCT02148380). Moreover, ACER and net benefit showed that the combination of EGFR‐TKI with chemotherapy and osimertinib was of more economic benefit following first‐generation EGFR‐TKIs. Sensitivity analyses showed that the impact of utilities and monotherapy could be cost‐effective with a 50% cost reduction. CONCLUSION: First‐generation EGFR‐TKI therapy remained the most cost‐effective treatment option for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients. Our results could serve as both a reference for both clinical practice and the formulation of medical insurance reimbursement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7957173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79571732021-03-19 Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients Li, Wen‐Qian Li, Ling‐Yu Chai, Jin Cui, Jiu‐Wei Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research OBJECTIVES: Recent studies showed prolonged survival for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with both monotherapies and combined therapies. However, high costs limit clinical applications. Thus, we conducted this cost‐effectiveness analysis to explore an optimal first‐line treatment for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survival data were extracted from six clinical trials, including ARCHER1050 (dacomitinib vs. gefitinib); FLAURA (osimertinib vs. gefitinib/erlotinib); JO25567 and NEJ026 (bevacizumab +erlotinib vs. erlotinib); NEJ009 (gefitinib +chemotherapy vs. gefitinib); and NCT02148380 (gefitinib +chemotherapy vs. gefitinib vs. chemotherapy) trials. Cost‐related data were obtained from hospitals and published literature. The effect parameter (quality‐adjusted life year [QALY]) was the reflection of both survival and utility. Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER), average cost‐effectiveness ratio (ACER), and net benefit were calculated, and the willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold was set at $30828/QALY from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the stability of results. RESULTS: We compared treatment groups with control groups in each trial. ICERs were $1897750.74/QALY (ARCHER1050), $416560.02/QALY (FLAURA), ‐$477607.48/QALY (JO25567), ‐$464326.66/QALY (NEJ026), ‐$277121.22/QALY (NEJ009), ‐$399360.94/QALY (gefitinib as comparison, NCT02148380), and ‐$170733.05/QALY (chemotherapy as comparison, NCT02148380). Moreover, ACER and net benefit showed that the combination of EGFR‐TKI with chemotherapy and osimertinib was of more economic benefit following first‐generation EGFR‐TKIs. Sensitivity analyses showed that the impact of utilities and monotherapy could be cost‐effective with a 50% cost reduction. CONCLUSION: First‐generation EGFR‐TKI therapy remained the most cost‐effective treatment option for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients. Our results could serve as both a reference for both clinical practice and the formulation of medical insurance reimbursement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7957173/ /pubmed/33626238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3733 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Li, Wen‐Qian
Li, Ling‐Yu
Chai, Jin
Cui, Jiu‐Wei
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
title Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
title_full Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
title_fullStr Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
title_short Cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
title_sort cost‐effectiveness analysis of first‐line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer patients
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3733
work_keys_str_mv AT liwenqian costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT lilingyu costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT chaijin costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT cuijiuwei costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients