Cargando…
ETV6-RUNX1融合基因阳性儿童急性前体B淋巴细胞白血病的临床特征及预后分析
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical features and prognosis of ETV6-RUNX1-positive childhood B-precursor acute lymphocyte leukemia (B-ALL). METHODS: The clinical data of 927 newly diagnosed children with B-ALL admitted to the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from April 2011 to May 2020 wer...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33677868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2021.01.009 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical features and prognosis of ETV6-RUNX1-positive childhood B-precursor acute lymphocyte leukemia (B-ALL). METHODS: The clinical data of 927 newly diagnosed children with B-ALL admitted to the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from April 2011 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of ETV6-RUNX1 gene, the patients were divided into ETV6-RUNX1(+) and ETV6-RUNX1(−) groups. The clinical features and prognosis between the two groups were compared. Among the 182 children with ETV6-RUNX1(+), 144 patients received the Chinese Childhood Leukemia Collaborative Group (CCLG)-ALL 2008 protocol (CCLG-ALL 2008 group) and 38 received the China Childhood Cancer Collaborative Group (CCCG)-ALL2015 protocol (CCCG-ALL 2015 group). The efficacy, serious adverse effects (SAE) incidence, and treatment-related mortality (TRM) of the two groups were also compared. RESULTS: Of the 927 B-ALL patients, 189 (20.4%) were ETV6-RUNX1(+). The proportion of patients with risk factors (age ≥10 years or <1 year, white blood cell count ≥50×10(9)/L) in the ETV6-RUNX1(+) group was significantly lower than that in the ETV6-RUNX1(−) group (P=0.000, 0.001, respectively), while the proportion of patients with good early response (good response to prednisone, d15 or d19 MRD <1%, and d33 or d46 MRD<0.01% in induction chemotherapy) in the ETV6-RUNX1(+) group was significantly higher than that in the ETV6-RUNX1(−) group (P=0.028, 0.004, respectively). The 5-year EFS and OS of the ETV6-RUNX1(+) group were significantly higher than those of the ETV6-RUNX1(−) group (EFS: 89.8% vs 83.2%, P=0.003; OS: 90.2% vs 86.3%, P=0.030). The incidence of infection-related SAE and TRM was significantly higher than that of CCCG-ALL 2015 group. A statistical difference was observed between the incidence of infection-related SAE of the two groups (27.1% vs 5.3%, P=0.004), but no difference in TRM (4.9% vs 0, P=0.348). CONCLUSION: ETV6-RUNX1(+)B-ALL children have fewer risk factors at diagnosis, better early response, lower recurrence rate, and good prognosis than that of ETV6-RUNX1(−)B-ALL children. Reducing the intensity of chemotherapy appropriately can lower the infection-related SAE and TRM and improve the long-term survival in this subtype. |
---|