Cargando…

MIPSS70-plus预后积分系统评估中国原发性骨髓纤维化患者预后的评价

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of MIPSS70-plus in Chinese patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). METHODS: A total of 113 Chinese patients with PMF were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression model were performed to ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33677863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2021.01.004
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of MIPSS70-plus in Chinese patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). METHODS: A total of 113 Chinese patients with PMF were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression model were performed to evaluate the prognostic factors. The likelihood ratio test was used to evaluate the predictive power between MIPSS70-plus and DIPSS systems. RESULTS: The median age of the Chinese patients was 55 (range: 20–70) years, including 71 males and 42 females. According to the standard of MIPSS70-plus system, 99 patients (79.6%) had a favorable karyotype and 23 patients (20.4%) had an unfavorable karyotype. JAK2V617F in 55.8% (n=63), CALR exon9 in 17.7% (including 15 CALR type 1 and 5 CALR type 2, n=20), MPLW515 in 4.4% (n=5), and triple negative (no detectable JAK2, MPL, and CALR mutations) in 22.1% of patients in our cohort were found by target-specific next-generation sequencing approach. At least one high-molecular risk mutations were presented in 45.1% (n=51) of patients, with ASXL1 in 38.9% (n=44), SRSF2 in 7.1% (n=8), IDH1/2 in 4.4% (n=5), and EZH2 in 3.5% (n=4) of patients. A total of 28 patients (26.7%) were in low risk, 20 (19.0%) in intermediate risk, 41 (39.0%) in high risk, and 16 (15.3%) in very-high risk categories, which were delineated for the MIPSS70-plus model. A 2-year OS was 100% in low risk, 89.7% (95% CI 76.2% – 100.0%) in intermediate risk, 64.8% (95% CI 47.0% – 82.6%) in high risk, and 35.0% (95% CI 10.3% – 59.7%) in very-high risk categories, which had a significant difference (P<0.001). A significantly higher predictive power for survival of the MIPSS70-plus group was observed compared with the DIPSS group (P=0.001, −2 log-likelihood ratios of 86.355 vs 95.990 for the MIPSS70-plus and DIPSS systems, respectively). CONCLUSION: The MIPSS70-plus had significantly higher predictive power than the DIPSS.