Cargando…

Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the surgical strategy, safety, and efficacy of close reduction and robot‐aided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation in treatment of traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. METHODS: Data of 32 patients (21 males and 11 females) with traumatic spinopelvic dissociation treated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zhao‐jie, Hu, Yong‐cheng, Tian, Wei, Jin, Xin, Qi, Hao‐tian, Sun, Yu‐xi, Jia, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12908
_version_ 1783664641091567616
author Liu, Zhao‐jie
Hu, Yong‐cheng
Tian, Wei
Jin, Xin
Qi, Hao‐tian
Sun, Yu‐xi
Jia, Jian
author_facet Liu, Zhao‐jie
Hu, Yong‐cheng
Tian, Wei
Jin, Xin
Qi, Hao‐tian
Sun, Yu‐xi
Jia, Jian
author_sort Liu, Zhao‐jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the surgical strategy, safety, and efficacy of close reduction and robot‐aided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation in treatment of traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. METHODS: Data of 32 patients (21 males and 11 females) with traumatic spinopelvic dissociation treated by lumbopelvic fixation with robot‐aided minimally invasive technique or conventional open procedure in our institution from March 2010 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into robot group and control group. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, fluoroscopy frequency, total drilling times, infection rate, hospitalization time, and sacral fracture healing time were reviewed. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were totally acquired to evaluate the reduction quality, residual fracture displacement, and Gras classification on screws insertion after surgery. According to the Majeed scoring system, functional outcome was assessed for each patient at the final follow‐up. RESULTS: There were 12 patients in the robot group and 20 patients in the control group with no significant difference about the demographic data. The average surgical time was 148.3 ± 40.5 min with intraoperative blood loss of 142.5±36.7 mL in the robot group and 185.0 ± 47.8 min with 612.5 ± 182.7 mL in the control group (P = 0.034, P = 0.000). The robot group had a shorter mean hospitalization time at 19.9 ± 7.0 days compared to the control group with 28.6 ± 5.4 days (P = 0.010). The fluoroscopy frequency was 35.4 ± 3.0 in the robot group and 45.5 ± 3.6 in the control group (P = 0.000) and total drilling times were 7.1 ± 1.1 and 9.6 ± 1.3 (P = 0.000), respectively. The infection rate was 0% (0/12) in the robot group and 15% (3/20) in the control group (P = 0.159). According to the Gras classification on screw positioning, there were 11 cases in Grade I and 1 case in Grade II in the robot group, and 14 cases in Grade I and 6 cases in Grade II in the control group. All the patients were followed up consecutively for at least 12 months, with an average follow‐up period of 17.1 ± 3.6 months. All sacral fractures healed with an average time of 3.8 ± 0.6 months in the robot group and 4.7 ± 0.7 months in the control group (P = 0.000). According to Majeed functional assessment investigation, the mean score of the patients was 87.2 ± 4.0 in the robot group and 83.1 ± 4.5 in the control group (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Robot‐aided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation is a safe and feasible option with advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, less radiation damage, less hospitalization time, and better functional outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7957401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79574012021-03-19 Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation Liu, Zhao‐jie Hu, Yong‐cheng Tian, Wei Jin, Xin Qi, Hao‐tian Sun, Yu‐xi Jia, Jian Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To investigate the surgical strategy, safety, and efficacy of close reduction and robot‐aided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation in treatment of traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. METHODS: Data of 32 patients (21 males and 11 females) with traumatic spinopelvic dissociation treated by lumbopelvic fixation with robot‐aided minimally invasive technique or conventional open procedure in our institution from March 2010 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into robot group and control group. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, fluoroscopy frequency, total drilling times, infection rate, hospitalization time, and sacral fracture healing time were reviewed. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were totally acquired to evaluate the reduction quality, residual fracture displacement, and Gras classification on screws insertion after surgery. According to the Majeed scoring system, functional outcome was assessed for each patient at the final follow‐up. RESULTS: There were 12 patients in the robot group and 20 patients in the control group with no significant difference about the demographic data. The average surgical time was 148.3 ± 40.5 min with intraoperative blood loss of 142.5±36.7 mL in the robot group and 185.0 ± 47.8 min with 612.5 ± 182.7 mL in the control group (P = 0.034, P = 0.000). The robot group had a shorter mean hospitalization time at 19.9 ± 7.0 days compared to the control group with 28.6 ± 5.4 days (P = 0.010). The fluoroscopy frequency was 35.4 ± 3.0 in the robot group and 45.5 ± 3.6 in the control group (P = 0.000) and total drilling times were 7.1 ± 1.1 and 9.6 ± 1.3 (P = 0.000), respectively. The infection rate was 0% (0/12) in the robot group and 15% (3/20) in the control group (P = 0.159). According to the Gras classification on screw positioning, there were 11 cases in Grade I and 1 case in Grade II in the robot group, and 14 cases in Grade I and 6 cases in Grade II in the control group. All the patients were followed up consecutively for at least 12 months, with an average follow‐up period of 17.1 ± 3.6 months. All sacral fractures healed with an average time of 3.8 ± 0.6 months in the robot group and 4.7 ± 0.7 months in the control group (P = 0.000). According to Majeed functional assessment investigation, the mean score of the patients was 87.2 ± 4.0 in the robot group and 83.1 ± 4.5 in the control group (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Robot‐aided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation is a safe and feasible option with advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, less radiation damage, less hospitalization time, and better functional outcome. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7957401/ /pubmed/33665983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12908 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Liu, Zhao‐jie
Hu, Yong‐cheng
Tian, Wei
Jin, Xin
Qi, Hao‐tian
Sun, Yu‐xi
Jia, Jian
Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation
title Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation
title_full Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation
title_fullStr Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation
title_full_unstemmed Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation
title_short Robot‐Aided Minimally Invasive Lumbopelvic Fixation in Treatment of Traumatic Spinopelvic Dissociation
title_sort robot‐aided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation in treatment of traumatic spinopelvic dissociation
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12908
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzhaojie robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation
AT huyongcheng robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation
AT tianwei robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation
AT jinxin robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation
AT qihaotian robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation
AT sunyuxi robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation
AT jiajian robotaidedminimallyinvasivelumbopelvicfixationintreatmentoftraumaticspinopelvicdissociation