Cargando…

Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present paper was to reveal the clinical differences between selective and nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine (TSCTS). METHODS: A total of 34 patients were eligible and included in the study. Among them, 8 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chao, Wang, Qi‐zun, Gao, Jing‐hao, Zhang, Liang, Zhang, Lu, Chen, Bo‐hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12889
_version_ 1783664644851761152
author Wang, Chao
Wang, Qi‐zun
Gao, Jing‐hao
Zhang, Liang
Zhang, Lu
Chen, Bo‐hua
author_facet Wang, Chao
Wang, Qi‐zun
Gao, Jing‐hao
Zhang, Liang
Zhang, Lu
Chen, Bo‐hua
author_sort Wang, Chao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present paper was to reveal the clinical differences between selective and nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine (TSCTS). METHODS: A total of 34 patients were eligible and included in the study. Among them, 8 patients underwent selective cervical decompression (CD), 15 patients underwent selective thoracic decompression (TD), and 11 patients underwent combined CD and TD (CTD) surgery. Age, sex, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, inpatient expenditure, preoperative upper Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) rate, canal occupation rate, high‐intensity T2‐weighted image (T2WI) of the spinal cord, and preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The CD group had shorter operative time (138.8 ± 36.1 vs 229.7 ± 95.8 vs 328.6 ± 94.8, min, P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (141.3 ± 116.7 vs 496.7 ± 361.8 vs 654.6 ± 320.5, mL, P = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 9.0 ± 3.5 vs 10.3 ± 6.6, days, P = 0.008), as well as lower preoperative upper JOA rate (34.1 ± 5.6 vs 53.9 ± 8.4 vs 48.2 ± 15.2, %, P = 0.001) than the TD and CTD groups. The CTD group had higher inpatient expenditure than the CD and TD groups (87,850 ± 18,379 vs 55,100 ± 12,890 vs 55,772 ± 15,715, CNY, P < 0.001). The cervical canal occupation rates were similar among different groups (P > 0.05); however, the TD group showed a higher thoracic canal occupation rate than the CD group (58.3 ± 14.7 vs 43.3 ± 12.3, %, P = 0.035). All positive levels in high‐intensity T2WI of the spinal cord were decompressed. The preoperative JOA scores as well as the postoperative JOA scores at 6 months and at last follow‐up were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). Similarly, the JOA recovery rate showed no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Selective CD or TD alone demonstrated similar clinical effectiveness to nonselective and combined CTD for TSCTS. Individualized surgical decision should be made after meticulous assessments of clinical and radiological manifestations, general patient condition, and socioeconomic factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7957417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79574172021-03-19 Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study Wang, Chao Wang, Qi‐zun Gao, Jing‐hao Zhang, Liang Zhang, Lu Chen, Bo‐hua Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present paper was to reveal the clinical differences between selective and nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine (TSCTS). METHODS: A total of 34 patients were eligible and included in the study. Among them, 8 patients underwent selective cervical decompression (CD), 15 patients underwent selective thoracic decompression (TD), and 11 patients underwent combined CD and TD (CTD) surgery. Age, sex, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, inpatient expenditure, preoperative upper Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) rate, canal occupation rate, high‐intensity T2‐weighted image (T2WI) of the spinal cord, and preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The CD group had shorter operative time (138.8 ± 36.1 vs 229.7 ± 95.8 vs 328.6 ± 94.8, min, P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (141.3 ± 116.7 vs 496.7 ± 361.8 vs 654.6 ± 320.5, mL, P = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 9.0 ± 3.5 vs 10.3 ± 6.6, days, P = 0.008), as well as lower preoperative upper JOA rate (34.1 ± 5.6 vs 53.9 ± 8.4 vs 48.2 ± 15.2, %, P = 0.001) than the TD and CTD groups. The CTD group had higher inpatient expenditure than the CD and TD groups (87,850 ± 18,379 vs 55,100 ± 12,890 vs 55,772 ± 15,715, CNY, P < 0.001). The cervical canal occupation rates were similar among different groups (P > 0.05); however, the TD group showed a higher thoracic canal occupation rate than the CD group (58.3 ± 14.7 vs 43.3 ± 12.3, %, P = 0.035). All positive levels in high‐intensity T2WI of the spinal cord were decompressed. The preoperative JOA scores as well as the postoperative JOA scores at 6 months and at last follow‐up were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). Similarly, the JOA recovery rate showed no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Selective CD or TD alone demonstrated similar clinical effectiveness to nonselective and combined CTD for TSCTS. Individualized surgical decision should be made after meticulous assessments of clinical and radiological manifestations, general patient condition, and socioeconomic factors. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7957417/ /pubmed/33619891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12889 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Wang, Chao
Wang, Qi‐zun
Gao, Jing‐hao
Zhang, Liang
Zhang, Lu
Chen, Bo‐hua
Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort clinical comparison of selective versus nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine: a retrospective cohort study
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12889
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchao clinicalcomparisonofselectiveversusnonselectivedecompressionforsymptomatictandemstenosisofthecervicalandthoracicspinearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangqizun clinicalcomparisonofselectiveversusnonselectivedecompressionforsymptomatictandemstenosisofthecervicalandthoracicspinearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT gaojinghao clinicalcomparisonofselectiveversusnonselectivedecompressionforsymptomatictandemstenosisofthecervicalandthoracicspinearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangliang clinicalcomparisonofselectiveversusnonselectivedecompressionforsymptomatictandemstenosisofthecervicalandthoracicspinearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhanglu clinicalcomparisonofselectiveversusnonselectivedecompressionforsymptomatictandemstenosisofthecervicalandthoracicspinearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenbohua clinicalcomparisonofselectiveversusnonselectivedecompressionforsymptomatictandemstenosisofthecervicalandthoracicspinearetrospectivecohortstudy