Cargando…

Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves

In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an impor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Soury, Marwa, García-García, Óscar Darío, Moretti, Matteo, Perroteau, Isabelle, Raimondo, Stefania, Lovati, Arianna Barbara, Carriel, Víctor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052389
_version_ 1783664682963304448
author El Soury, Marwa
García-García, Óscar Darío
Moretti, Matteo
Perroteau, Isabelle
Raimondo, Stefania
Lovati, Arianna Barbara
Carriel, Víctor
author_facet El Soury, Marwa
García-García, Óscar Darío
Moretti, Matteo
Perroteau, Isabelle
Raimondo, Stefania
Lovati, Arianna Barbara
Carriel, Víctor
author_sort El Soury, Marwa
collection PubMed
description In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an important role in supporting axonal guiding and peripheral nerve regeneration. Up to now, the known decellularized techniques are time and effort consuming. The present study, performed on rat sciatic nerves, aims at investigating a novel nerve decellularization protocol able to combine an effective decellularization in short time with a good preservation of the extracellular matrix component. To do this, a decellularization protocol proven to be efficient for tendons (DN-P1) was compared with a decellularization protocol specifically developed for nerves (DN-P2). The outcomes of both the decellularization protocols were assessed by a series of in vitro evaluations, including qualitative and quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analyses, DNA quantification, SEM and TEM ultrastructural analyses, mechanical testing, and viability assay. The overall results showed that DN-P1 could provide promising results if tested in vivo, as the in vitro characterization demonstrated that DN-P1 conserved a better ultrastructure and ECM components compared to DN-P2. Most importantly, DN-P1 was shown to be highly biocompatible, supporting a greater number of viable metabolically active cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7957587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79575872021-03-16 Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves El Soury, Marwa García-García, Óscar Darío Moretti, Matteo Perroteau, Isabelle Raimondo, Stefania Lovati, Arianna Barbara Carriel, Víctor Int J Mol Sci Article In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an important role in supporting axonal guiding and peripheral nerve regeneration. Up to now, the known decellularized techniques are time and effort consuming. The present study, performed on rat sciatic nerves, aims at investigating a novel nerve decellularization protocol able to combine an effective decellularization in short time with a good preservation of the extracellular matrix component. To do this, a decellularization protocol proven to be efficient for tendons (DN-P1) was compared with a decellularization protocol specifically developed for nerves (DN-P2). The outcomes of both the decellularization protocols were assessed by a series of in vitro evaluations, including qualitative and quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analyses, DNA quantification, SEM and TEM ultrastructural analyses, mechanical testing, and viability assay. The overall results showed that DN-P1 could provide promising results if tested in vivo, as the in vitro characterization demonstrated that DN-P1 conserved a better ultrastructure and ECM components compared to DN-P2. Most importantly, DN-P1 was shown to be highly biocompatible, supporting a greater number of viable metabolically active cells. MDPI 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7957587/ /pubmed/33673602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052389 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
El Soury, Marwa
García-García, Óscar Darío
Moretti, Matteo
Perroteau, Isabelle
Raimondo, Stefania
Lovati, Arianna Barbara
Carriel, Víctor
Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
title Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
title_full Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
title_fullStr Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
title_short Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
title_sort comparison of decellularization protocols to generate peripheral nerve grafts: a study on rat sciatic nerves
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052389
work_keys_str_mv AT elsourymarwa comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves
AT garciagarciaoscardario comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves
AT morettimatteo comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves
AT perroteauisabelle comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves
AT raimondostefania comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves
AT lovatiariannabarbara comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves
AT carrielvictor comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves