Cargando…
Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves
In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an impor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052389 |
_version_ | 1783664682963304448 |
---|---|
author | El Soury, Marwa García-García, Óscar Darío Moretti, Matteo Perroteau, Isabelle Raimondo, Stefania Lovati, Arianna Barbara Carriel, Víctor |
author_facet | El Soury, Marwa García-García, Óscar Darío Moretti, Matteo Perroteau, Isabelle Raimondo, Stefania Lovati, Arianna Barbara Carriel, Víctor |
author_sort | El Soury, Marwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an important role in supporting axonal guiding and peripheral nerve regeneration. Up to now, the known decellularized techniques are time and effort consuming. The present study, performed on rat sciatic nerves, aims at investigating a novel nerve decellularization protocol able to combine an effective decellularization in short time with a good preservation of the extracellular matrix component. To do this, a decellularization protocol proven to be efficient for tendons (DN-P1) was compared with a decellularization protocol specifically developed for nerves (DN-P2). The outcomes of both the decellularization protocols were assessed by a series of in vitro evaluations, including qualitative and quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analyses, DNA quantification, SEM and TEM ultrastructural analyses, mechanical testing, and viability assay. The overall results showed that DN-P1 could provide promising results if tested in vivo, as the in vitro characterization demonstrated that DN-P1 conserved a better ultrastructure and ECM components compared to DN-P2. Most importantly, DN-P1 was shown to be highly biocompatible, supporting a greater number of viable metabolically active cells. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7957587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79575872021-03-16 Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves El Soury, Marwa García-García, Óscar Darío Moretti, Matteo Perroteau, Isabelle Raimondo, Stefania Lovati, Arianna Barbara Carriel, Víctor Int J Mol Sci Article In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an important role in supporting axonal guiding and peripheral nerve regeneration. Up to now, the known decellularized techniques are time and effort consuming. The present study, performed on rat sciatic nerves, aims at investigating a novel nerve decellularization protocol able to combine an effective decellularization in short time with a good preservation of the extracellular matrix component. To do this, a decellularization protocol proven to be efficient for tendons (DN-P1) was compared with a decellularization protocol specifically developed for nerves (DN-P2). The outcomes of both the decellularization protocols were assessed by a series of in vitro evaluations, including qualitative and quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analyses, DNA quantification, SEM and TEM ultrastructural analyses, mechanical testing, and viability assay. The overall results showed that DN-P1 could provide promising results if tested in vivo, as the in vitro characterization demonstrated that DN-P1 conserved a better ultrastructure and ECM components compared to DN-P2. Most importantly, DN-P1 was shown to be highly biocompatible, supporting a greater number of viable metabolically active cells. MDPI 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7957587/ /pubmed/33673602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052389 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article El Soury, Marwa García-García, Óscar Darío Moretti, Matteo Perroteau, Isabelle Raimondo, Stefania Lovati, Arianna Barbara Carriel, Víctor Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves |
title | Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves |
title_full | Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves |
title_short | Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves |
title_sort | comparison of decellularization protocols to generate peripheral nerve grafts: a study on rat sciatic nerves |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elsourymarwa comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves AT garciagarciaoscardario comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves AT morettimatteo comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves AT perroteauisabelle comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves AT raimondostefania comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves AT lovatiariannabarbara comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves AT carrielvictor comparisonofdecellularizationprotocolstogenerateperipheralnervegraftsastudyonratsciaticnerves |