Cargando…

Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review

Child domestic work (CDW) is a hidden form of child labour. Globally, there were an estimated 17.2 million CDWs aged 5–17 in 2012, but there has been little critical analysis of methods and survey instruments used to capture prevalence of CDW. This rapid systematic review identified and critically r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pocock, Nicola S., Chan, Clara W., Zimmerman, Cathy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052357
_version_ 1783664700724084736
author Pocock, Nicola S.
Chan, Clara W.
Zimmerman, Cathy
author_facet Pocock, Nicola S.
Chan, Clara W.
Zimmerman, Cathy
author_sort Pocock, Nicola S.
collection PubMed
description Child domestic work (CDW) is a hidden form of child labour. Globally, there were an estimated 17.2 million CDWs aged 5–17 in 2012, but there has been little critical analysis of methods and survey instruments used to capture prevalence of CDW. This rapid systematic review identified and critically reviewed the measurement tools used to estimate CDWs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019148702). Fourteen studies were included. In nationally representative surveys, CDW prevalence ranged from 17% among 13–24-year-old females in Haiti to 2% of children aged 10–17 in Brazil. Two good quality studies and one good quality measurement tool were identified. CDW prevalence was assessed using occupation-based methods (n = 9/14), household roster (n = 7) and industry methods (n = 4). Six studies combined approaches. Four studies included task-based questions; one study used this method to formally calculate prevalence. The task-based study estimated 30,000 more CDWs compared to other methods. CDWs are probably being undercounted, based on current standard measurement approaches. We recommend use of more sensitive, task-based methods for inclusion in household surveys. The cognitive and pilot testing of newly developed task-based questions is essential to ensure comprehension. In analyses, researchers should consider CDWs who may be disguised as distant or non-relatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7957663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79576632021-03-16 Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review Pocock, Nicola S. Chan, Clara W. Zimmerman, Cathy Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Child domestic work (CDW) is a hidden form of child labour. Globally, there were an estimated 17.2 million CDWs aged 5–17 in 2012, but there has been little critical analysis of methods and survey instruments used to capture prevalence of CDW. This rapid systematic review identified and critically reviewed the measurement tools used to estimate CDWs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019148702). Fourteen studies were included. In nationally representative surveys, CDW prevalence ranged from 17% among 13–24-year-old females in Haiti to 2% of children aged 10–17 in Brazil. Two good quality studies and one good quality measurement tool were identified. CDW prevalence was assessed using occupation-based methods (n = 9/14), household roster (n = 7) and industry methods (n = 4). Six studies combined approaches. Four studies included task-based questions; one study used this method to formally calculate prevalence. The task-based study estimated 30,000 more CDWs compared to other methods. CDWs are probably being undercounted, based on current standard measurement approaches. We recommend use of more sensitive, task-based methods for inclusion in household surveys. The cognitive and pilot testing of newly developed task-based questions is essential to ensure comprehension. In analyses, researchers should consider CDWs who may be disguised as distant or non-relatives. MDPI 2021-02-28 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7957663/ /pubmed/33670949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052357 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Pocock, Nicola S.
Chan, Clara W.
Zimmerman, Cathy
Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review
title Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_full Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_fullStr Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_short Suitability of Measurement Tools for Assessing the Prevalence of Child Domestic Work: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_sort suitability of measurement tools for assessing the prevalence of child domestic work: a rapid systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7957663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052357
work_keys_str_mv AT pococknicolas suitabilityofmeasurementtoolsforassessingtheprevalenceofchilddomesticworkarapidsystematicreview
AT chanclaraw suitabilityofmeasurementtoolsforassessingtheprevalenceofchilddomesticworkarapidsystematicreview
AT zimmermancathy suitabilityofmeasurementtoolsforassessingtheprevalenceofchilddomesticworkarapidsystematicreview