Cargando…
Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671 |
_version_ | 1783664767438684160 |
---|---|
author | Nam, Minjeong Song, Da Young Song, Sang Hoon Roh, Eun Youn Shin, Sue Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young |
author_facet | Nam, Minjeong Song, Da Young Song, Sang Hoon Roh, Eun Youn Shin, Sue Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young |
author_sort | Nam, Minjeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti‐HBc, anti‐HBe, anti‐HBs, anti‐HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r (2)) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (−0.11% ~ 0.21%). CONCLUSION: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000(SR.) It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7958004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79580042021-03-19 Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system Nam, Minjeong Song, Da Young Song, Sang Hoon Roh, Eun Youn Shin, Sue Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti‐HBc, anti‐HBe, anti‐HBs, anti‐HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r (2)) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (−0.11% ~ 0.21%). CONCLUSION: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000(SR.) It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7958004/ /pubmed/33283340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Nam, Minjeong Song, Da Young Song, Sang Hoon Roh, Eun Youn Shin, Sue Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system |
title | Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system |
title_full | Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system |
title_fullStr | Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system |
title_short | Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system |
title_sort | performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the alinity i system |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT namminjeong performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem AT songdayoung performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem AT songsanghoon performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem AT roheunyoun performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem AT shinsue performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem AT parkkyoungun performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem AT songeunyoung performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem |