Cargando…

Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system

BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Minjeong, Song, Da Young, Song, Sang Hoon, Roh, Eun Youn, Shin, Sue, Park, Kyoung Un, Song, Eun Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671
_version_ 1783664767438684160
author Nam, Minjeong
Song, Da Young
Song, Sang Hoon
Roh, Eun Youn
Shin, Sue
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Eun Young
author_facet Nam, Minjeong
Song, Da Young
Song, Sang Hoon
Roh, Eun Youn
Shin, Sue
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Eun Young
author_sort Nam, Minjeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti‐HBc, anti‐HBe, anti‐HBs, anti‐HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r (2)) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (−0.11% ~ 0.21%). CONCLUSION: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000(SR.) It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7958004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79580042021-03-19 Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system Nam, Minjeong Song, Da Young Song, Sang Hoon Roh, Eun Youn Shin, Sue Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti‐HBc, anti‐HBe, anti‐HBs, anti‐HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r (2)) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (−0.11% ~ 0.21%). CONCLUSION: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000(SR.) It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7958004/ /pubmed/33283340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Nam, Minjeong
Song, Da Young
Song, Sang Hoon
Roh, Eun Youn
Shin, Sue
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Eun Young
Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
title Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
title_full Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
title_short Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system
title_sort performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the alinity i system
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671
work_keys_str_mv AT namminjeong performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem
AT songdayoung performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem
AT songsanghoon performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem
AT roheunyoun performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem
AT shinsue performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem
AT parkkyoungun performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem
AT songeunyoung performanceevaluationofimmunoassayforinfectiousdiseasesonthealinityisystem