Cargando…
Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
BACKGROUND: Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferab...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w |
_version_ | 1783664771893035008 |
---|---|
author | Popp, Johanna Grüne, Eva Carl, Johannes Semrau, Jana Pfeifer, Klaus |
author_facet | Popp, Johanna Grüne, Eva Carl, Johannes Semrau, Jana Pfeifer, Klaus |
author_sort | Popp, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferability of cooperative planning to new settings and the key factors influencing its success or failure remain unclear. At the same time, co-creation processes are complex, and evaluation can be challenging. Following calls for detailed reporting, this paper describes the programme activities, the underlying logic, and methodological design of a study that aims to evaluate the transfer of cooperative planning to new settings and to explore the associated key determinants. METHODS: Cooperative planning was utilized as a strategy to target physical activity promotion in three real-world German settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronics sectors. This involved researchers working alongside stakeholders from practice and policy to conjointly develop new interventions to promote physical activity in physically demanding jobs. A pragmatic approach is used to evaluate both the transferability and key determinants of this strategy. We developed a logic model for this co-creation process that describes the underlying assumptions and guides the evaluation. The evaluation outcomes of this study include planning meetings, newly developed interventions, and the determinants that are likely to affect cooperative planning. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected using questionnaires, documents, and interviews. The quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while the qualitative data will mainly be analysed using qualitative content analysis, split by settings. Subsequently, data triangulation will be used to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings, which will then be compared across all three settings. DISCUSSION: The study findings will contribute to a better understanding of co-creation strategies, their transferability, and key determinants. The practical implications can include a checklist for assessing key determinants and a guideline for transferring cooperative planning into new settings to benefit more people. Ultimately, this study will help to advance co-creation strategies and may be relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers targeting physical activity promotion in various contexts. Trial registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r6xnt/ (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7958094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79580942021-03-15 Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach Popp, Johanna Grüne, Eva Carl, Johannes Semrau, Jana Pfeifer, Klaus Health Res Policy Syst Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferability of cooperative planning to new settings and the key factors influencing its success or failure remain unclear. At the same time, co-creation processes are complex, and evaluation can be challenging. Following calls for detailed reporting, this paper describes the programme activities, the underlying logic, and methodological design of a study that aims to evaluate the transfer of cooperative planning to new settings and to explore the associated key determinants. METHODS: Cooperative planning was utilized as a strategy to target physical activity promotion in three real-world German settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronics sectors. This involved researchers working alongside stakeholders from practice and policy to conjointly develop new interventions to promote physical activity in physically demanding jobs. A pragmatic approach is used to evaluate both the transferability and key determinants of this strategy. We developed a logic model for this co-creation process that describes the underlying assumptions and guides the evaluation. The evaluation outcomes of this study include planning meetings, newly developed interventions, and the determinants that are likely to affect cooperative planning. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected using questionnaires, documents, and interviews. The quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while the qualitative data will mainly be analysed using qualitative content analysis, split by settings. Subsequently, data triangulation will be used to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings, which will then be compared across all three settings. DISCUSSION: The study findings will contribute to a better understanding of co-creation strategies, their transferability, and key determinants. The practical implications can include a checklist for assessing key determinants and a guideline for transferring cooperative planning into new settings to benefit more people. Ultimately, this study will help to advance co-creation strategies and may be relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers targeting physical activity promotion in various contexts. Trial registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r6xnt/ (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w. BioMed Central 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7958094/ /pubmed/33722274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Popp, Johanna Grüne, Eva Carl, Johannes Semrau, Jana Pfeifer, Klaus Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
title | Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
title_full | Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
title_fullStr | Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
title_short | Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
title_sort | co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poppjohanna cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach AT gruneeva cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach AT carljohannes cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach AT semraujana cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach AT pfeiferklaus cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach |