Cargando…

Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach

BACKGROUND: Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popp, Johanna, Grüne, Eva, Carl, Johannes, Semrau, Jana, Pfeifer, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w
_version_ 1783664771893035008
author Popp, Johanna
Grüne, Eva
Carl, Johannes
Semrau, Jana
Pfeifer, Klaus
author_facet Popp, Johanna
Grüne, Eva
Carl, Johannes
Semrau, Jana
Pfeifer, Klaus
author_sort Popp, Johanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferability of cooperative planning to new settings and the key factors influencing its success or failure remain unclear. At the same time, co-creation processes are complex, and evaluation can be challenging. Following calls for detailed reporting, this paper describes the programme activities, the underlying logic, and methodological design of a study that aims to evaluate the transfer of cooperative planning to new settings and to explore the associated key determinants. METHODS: Cooperative planning was utilized as a strategy to target physical activity promotion in three real-world German settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronics sectors. This involved researchers working alongside stakeholders from practice and policy to conjointly develop new interventions to promote physical activity in physically demanding jobs. A pragmatic approach is used to evaluate both the transferability and key determinants of this strategy. We developed a logic model for this co-creation process that describes the underlying assumptions and guides the evaluation. The evaluation outcomes of this study include planning meetings, newly developed interventions, and the determinants that are likely to affect cooperative planning. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected using questionnaires, documents, and interviews. The quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while the qualitative data will mainly be analysed using qualitative content analysis, split by settings. Subsequently, data triangulation will be used to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings, which will then be compared across all three settings. DISCUSSION: The study findings will contribute to a better understanding of co-creation strategies, their transferability, and key determinants. The practical implications can include a checklist for assessing key determinants and a guideline for transferring cooperative planning into new settings to benefit more people. Ultimately, this study will help to advance co-creation strategies and may be relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers targeting physical activity promotion in various contexts. Trial registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r6xnt/ (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7958094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79580942021-03-15 Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach Popp, Johanna Grüne, Eva Carl, Johannes Semrau, Jana Pfeifer, Klaus Health Res Policy Syst Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferability of cooperative planning to new settings and the key factors influencing its success or failure remain unclear. At the same time, co-creation processes are complex, and evaluation can be challenging. Following calls for detailed reporting, this paper describes the programme activities, the underlying logic, and methodological design of a study that aims to evaluate the transfer of cooperative planning to new settings and to explore the associated key determinants. METHODS: Cooperative planning was utilized as a strategy to target physical activity promotion in three real-world German settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronics sectors. This involved researchers working alongside stakeholders from practice and policy to conjointly develop new interventions to promote physical activity in physically demanding jobs. A pragmatic approach is used to evaluate both the transferability and key determinants of this strategy. We developed a logic model for this co-creation process that describes the underlying assumptions and guides the evaluation. The evaluation outcomes of this study include planning meetings, newly developed interventions, and the determinants that are likely to affect cooperative planning. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected using questionnaires, documents, and interviews. The quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while the qualitative data will mainly be analysed using qualitative content analysis, split by settings. Subsequently, data triangulation will be used to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings, which will then be compared across all three settings. DISCUSSION: The study findings will contribute to a better understanding of co-creation strategies, their transferability, and key determinants. The practical implications can include a checklist for assessing key determinants and a guideline for transferring cooperative planning into new settings to benefit more people. Ultimately, this study will help to advance co-creation strategies and may be relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers targeting physical activity promotion in various contexts. Trial registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r6xnt/ (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w. BioMed Central 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7958094/ /pubmed/33722274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Popp, Johanna
Grüne, Eva
Carl, Johannes
Semrau, Jana
Pfeifer, Klaus
Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
title Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
title_full Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
title_fullStr Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
title_full_unstemmed Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
title_short Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
title_sort co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w
work_keys_str_mv AT poppjohanna cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach
AT gruneeva cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach
AT carljohannes cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach
AT semraujana cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach
AT pfeiferklaus cocreatingphysicalactivityinterventionsamixedmethodsevaluationapproach