Cargando…
Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the patients’ experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000908 |
_version_ | 1783664789973630976 |
---|---|
author | Holm, Alexander Lindgren, Hans Bläckberg, Mats Augutis, Marika Jakobsson, Peter Tell, Mattias Wallinder, Jonas Lundström, Karl-Johan Styrke, Johan |
author_facet | Holm, Alexander Lindgren, Hans Bläckberg, Mats Augutis, Marika Jakobsson, Peter Tell, Mattias Wallinder, Jonas Lundström, Karl-Johan Styrke, Johan |
author_sort | Holm, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the patients’ experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two medium sized hospitals in Sweden. The reasons for conducting prostatic artery embolization were clean intermittent catheterization (n = 4), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 10) or haematuria (n = 1). Data were collected through individual, semi-structured telephone interviews 1–12 months after treatment and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories with sub-categories were formulated to describe the results: a diverse experience; ability to control the situation; resumption of everyday activities and range of opinions regarding efficacy of outcomes. Overall, the patients described the procedure as painless, easy and interesting and reported that while the procedure can be stressful, a calm atmosphere contributed to achieving a good experience. Limitations on access to reliable information before, during and after the procedure were highlighted as a major issue. Practical ideas for improving patient comfort during the procedure were suggested. Improved communications between treatment staff and patients were also highlighted. Most patients could resume everyday activities, some felt tired and bruising caused unnecessary worry for a few. Regarding functional outcome, some patients described substantial improvement in urine flow while others were satisfied with regaining undisturbed night sleep. Those with less effect were considering transurethral resection of the prostate as a future option. Self-enrolment to the treatment and long median operation time may have influenced the results. CONCLUSIONS: From the patients’ perspective, prostatic artery embolization is a well-tolerated method for treating benign prostate hyperplacia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7958185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79581852021-03-29 Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study Holm, Alexander Lindgren, Hans Bläckberg, Mats Augutis, Marika Jakobsson, Peter Tell, Mattias Wallinder, Jonas Lundström, Karl-Johan Styrke, Johan SAGE Open Med Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the patients’ experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two medium sized hospitals in Sweden. The reasons for conducting prostatic artery embolization were clean intermittent catheterization (n = 4), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 10) or haematuria (n = 1). Data were collected through individual, semi-structured telephone interviews 1–12 months after treatment and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories with sub-categories were formulated to describe the results: a diverse experience; ability to control the situation; resumption of everyday activities and range of opinions regarding efficacy of outcomes. Overall, the patients described the procedure as painless, easy and interesting and reported that while the procedure can be stressful, a calm atmosphere contributed to achieving a good experience. Limitations on access to reliable information before, during and after the procedure were highlighted as a major issue. Practical ideas for improving patient comfort during the procedure were suggested. Improved communications between treatment staff and patients were also highlighted. Most patients could resume everyday activities, some felt tired and bruising caused unnecessary worry for a few. Regarding functional outcome, some patients described substantial improvement in urine flow while others were satisfied with regaining undisturbed night sleep. Those with less effect were considering transurethral resection of the prostate as a future option. Self-enrolment to the treatment and long median operation time may have influenced the results. CONCLUSIONS: From the patients’ perspective, prostatic artery embolization is a well-tolerated method for treating benign prostate hyperplacia. SAGE Publications 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7958185/ /pubmed/33786178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000908 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Holm, Alexander Lindgren, Hans Bläckberg, Mats Augutis, Marika Jakobsson, Peter Tell, Mattias Wallinder, Jonas Lundström, Karl-Johan Styrke, Johan Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study |
title | Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative
study |
title_full | Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative
study |
title_fullStr | Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative
study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative
study |
title_short | Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative
study |
title_sort | patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: a qualitative
study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000908 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmalexander patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT lindgrenhans patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT blackbergmats patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT augutismarika patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT jakobssonpeter patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT tellmattias patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT wallinderjonas patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT lundstromkarljohan patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy AT styrkejohan patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy |