Cargando…

Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the patients’ experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holm, Alexander, Lindgren, Hans, Bläckberg, Mats, Augutis, Marika, Jakobsson, Peter, Tell, Mattias, Wallinder, Jonas, Lundström, Karl-Johan, Styrke, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000908
_version_ 1783664789973630976
author Holm, Alexander
Lindgren, Hans
Bläckberg, Mats
Augutis, Marika
Jakobsson, Peter
Tell, Mattias
Wallinder, Jonas
Lundström, Karl-Johan
Styrke, Johan
author_facet Holm, Alexander
Lindgren, Hans
Bläckberg, Mats
Augutis, Marika
Jakobsson, Peter
Tell, Mattias
Wallinder, Jonas
Lundström, Karl-Johan
Styrke, Johan
author_sort Holm, Alexander
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the patients’ experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two medium sized hospitals in Sweden. The reasons for conducting prostatic artery embolization were clean intermittent catheterization (n = 4), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 10) or haematuria (n = 1). Data were collected through individual, semi-structured telephone interviews 1–12 months after treatment and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories with sub-categories were formulated to describe the results: a diverse experience; ability to control the situation; resumption of everyday activities and range of opinions regarding efficacy of outcomes. Overall, the patients described the procedure as painless, easy and interesting and reported that while the procedure can be stressful, a calm atmosphere contributed to achieving a good experience. Limitations on access to reliable information before, during and after the procedure were highlighted as a major issue. Practical ideas for improving patient comfort during the procedure were suggested. Improved communications between treatment staff and patients were also highlighted. Most patients could resume everyday activities, some felt tired and bruising caused unnecessary worry for a few. Regarding functional outcome, some patients described substantial improvement in urine flow while others were satisfied with regaining undisturbed night sleep. Those with less effect were considering transurethral resection of the prostate as a future option. Self-enrolment to the treatment and long median operation time may have influenced the results. CONCLUSIONS: From the patients’ perspective, prostatic artery embolization is a well-tolerated method for treating benign prostate hyperplacia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7958185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79581852021-03-29 Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study Holm, Alexander Lindgren, Hans Bläckberg, Mats Augutis, Marika Jakobsson, Peter Tell, Mattias Wallinder, Jonas Lundström, Karl-Johan Styrke, Johan SAGE Open Med Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe the patients’ experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two medium sized hospitals in Sweden. The reasons for conducting prostatic artery embolization were clean intermittent catheterization (n = 4), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 10) or haematuria (n = 1). Data were collected through individual, semi-structured telephone interviews 1–12 months after treatment and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories with sub-categories were formulated to describe the results: a diverse experience; ability to control the situation; resumption of everyday activities and range of opinions regarding efficacy of outcomes. Overall, the patients described the procedure as painless, easy and interesting and reported that while the procedure can be stressful, a calm atmosphere contributed to achieving a good experience. Limitations on access to reliable information before, during and after the procedure were highlighted as a major issue. Practical ideas for improving patient comfort during the procedure were suggested. Improved communications between treatment staff and patients were also highlighted. Most patients could resume everyday activities, some felt tired and bruising caused unnecessary worry for a few. Regarding functional outcome, some patients described substantial improvement in urine flow while others were satisfied with regaining undisturbed night sleep. Those with less effect were considering transurethral resection of the prostate as a future option. Self-enrolment to the treatment and long median operation time may have influenced the results. CONCLUSIONS: From the patients’ perspective, prostatic artery embolization is a well-tolerated method for treating benign prostate hyperplacia. SAGE Publications 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7958185/ /pubmed/33786178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000908 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Holm, Alexander
Lindgren, Hans
Bläckberg, Mats
Augutis, Marika
Jakobsson, Peter
Tell, Mattias
Wallinder, Jonas
Lundström, Karl-Johan
Styrke, Johan
Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
title Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
title_full Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
title_short Patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
title_sort patients’ perspective on prostatic artery embolization: a qualitative study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7958185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000908
work_keys_str_mv AT holmalexander patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT lindgrenhans patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT blackbergmats patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT augutismarika patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT jakobssonpeter patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT tellmattias patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT wallinderjonas patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT lundstromkarljohan patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy
AT styrkejohan patientsperspectiveonprostaticarteryembolizationaqualitativestudy