Cargando…

“Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND: Early incontinence that has great impact on the quality-of-life is one usual drawback after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This prospective study aims at further documenting the improved effect of the “Sandwich” urethra reconstruction technique on continence at the early stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yong, Zhao, Qinxin, Yang, Feiya, Wang, Mingshuai, Xing, Nianzeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732026
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S299367
_version_ 1783664923360886784
author Liu, Yong
Zhao, Qinxin
Yang, Feiya
Wang, Mingshuai
Xing, Nianzeng
author_facet Liu, Yong
Zhao, Qinxin
Yang, Feiya
Wang, Mingshuai
Xing, Nianzeng
author_sort Liu, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early incontinence that has great impact on the quality-of-life is one usual drawback after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This prospective study aims at further documenting the improved effect of the “Sandwich” urethra reconstruction technique on continence at the early stage after LRP. METHODS: During the period from October 2017 to December 2018, 130 patients undergoing LRP in our institution were recruited into this prospective study. Sixty-six patients in Group A received LRP with the “Sandwich” technique of urethra reconstruction, while the remaining 64 patients in Group B did not adopt this reconstruction technique. The basic clinical data, perioperative related data, urinary continence, and urodynamic tests were analyzed and evaluated. RESULTS: There is no statistical difference in patients’ basic clinical data, perioperative related data except urethral reconstruction time, which was 23.49±4.72 minutes in Group A and 20.16±5.75 minutes in Group B (P<0.001). The continence rates in Group A at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were 54.55%, 83.33%, 93.94%, and 96.97%, respectively. The continence rates in Group B were 10.94%, 14.06%, 37.50%, and 71.88%, respectively. The continence rate of Group A was significantly higher after surgery compared with Group B (P<0.001). Maximum flow rates before and after the “Sandwich” procedure for 12 months were 13.2±2.8 m/s and 15.4±3.6 m/s, respectively (P=0.034). In addition, residual volumes before and after the “Sandwich” procedure for 12 months were 15 (0–20) mL and 0 (0–12.5) mL, respectively (P=0.107). CONCLUSION: Our prospective study confirms that the “Sandwich” technique of the total urethral reconstruction is safe and feasible. It also very possibly takes the significant advantage in early recovery of urinary continence after LRP. However, multicenter, randomized controlled large sample randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm this final conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7959195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79591952021-03-16 “Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study Liu, Yong Zhao, Qinxin Yang, Feiya Wang, Mingshuai Xing, Nianzeng Cancer Manag Res Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: Early incontinence that has great impact on the quality-of-life is one usual drawback after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This prospective study aims at further documenting the improved effect of the “Sandwich” urethra reconstruction technique on continence at the early stage after LRP. METHODS: During the period from October 2017 to December 2018, 130 patients undergoing LRP in our institution were recruited into this prospective study. Sixty-six patients in Group A received LRP with the “Sandwich” technique of urethra reconstruction, while the remaining 64 patients in Group B did not adopt this reconstruction technique. The basic clinical data, perioperative related data, urinary continence, and urodynamic tests were analyzed and evaluated. RESULTS: There is no statistical difference in patients’ basic clinical data, perioperative related data except urethral reconstruction time, which was 23.49±4.72 minutes in Group A and 20.16±5.75 minutes in Group B (P<0.001). The continence rates in Group A at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were 54.55%, 83.33%, 93.94%, and 96.97%, respectively. The continence rates in Group B were 10.94%, 14.06%, 37.50%, and 71.88%, respectively. The continence rate of Group A was significantly higher after surgery compared with Group B (P<0.001). Maximum flow rates before and after the “Sandwich” procedure for 12 months were 13.2±2.8 m/s and 15.4±3.6 m/s, respectively (P=0.034). In addition, residual volumes before and after the “Sandwich” procedure for 12 months were 15 (0–20) mL and 0 (0–12.5) mL, respectively (P=0.107). CONCLUSION: Our prospective study confirms that the “Sandwich” technique of the total urethral reconstruction is safe and feasible. It also very possibly takes the significant advantage in early recovery of urinary continence after LRP. However, multicenter, randomized controlled large sample randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm this final conclusion. Dove 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7959195/ /pubmed/33732026 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S299367 Text en © 2021 Liu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Liu, Yong
Zhao, Qinxin
Yang, Feiya
Wang, Mingshuai
Xing, Nianzeng
“Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study
title “Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study
title_full “Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr “Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed “Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study
title_short “Sandwich” Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study
title_sort “sandwich” technique of total urethral reconstruction in the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective study
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732026
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S299367
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyong sandwichtechniqueoftotalurethralreconstructioninthelaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyaprospectivestudy
AT zhaoqinxin sandwichtechniqueoftotalurethralreconstructioninthelaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyaprospectivestudy
AT yangfeiya sandwichtechniqueoftotalurethralreconstructioninthelaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyaprospectivestudy
AT wangmingshuai sandwichtechniqueoftotalurethralreconstructioninthelaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyaprospectivestudy
AT xingnianzeng sandwichtechniqueoftotalurethralreconstructioninthelaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyaprospectivestudy