Cargando…

Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship

Background: Endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a high-risk procedure. Competence in endotracheal intubation is a requirement for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) training programs, but fellow experience as the primary operator in intubating ICU patients has not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brady, Anna K., Brown, Wade, Denson, Joshua L., Winter, Gretchen, Niroula, Abesh, Santhosh, Lekshmi, Carlos, W. Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33728421
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0004OC
_version_ 1783664932521246720
author Brady, Anna K.
Brown, Wade
Denson, Joshua L.
Winter, Gretchen
Niroula, Abesh
Santhosh, Lekshmi
Carlos, W. Graham
author_facet Brady, Anna K.
Brown, Wade
Denson, Joshua L.
Winter, Gretchen
Niroula, Abesh
Santhosh, Lekshmi
Carlos, W. Graham
author_sort Brady, Anna K.
collection PubMed
description Background: Endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a high-risk procedure. Competence in endotracheal intubation is a requirement for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) training programs, but fellow experience as the primary operator in intubating ICU patients has not been described on a large scale. Objective: We hypothesized that significant variation surrounding endotracheal intubation practices in medical ICUs exists in U.S. PCCM training programs. Methods: We administered a survey to a convenience sample of U.S. PCCM fellows to elicit typical intubation practices in the medical ICU. Results: Eighty-nine discrete U.S. PCCM and Internal Medicine Critical Care Medicine training programs (77% response rate) were represented. At 43% of programs, the PCCM fellow was “always or almost always” designated the primary operator for intubation of a medical ICU patient, whereas at 21% of programs, the PCCM fellow was “rarely or never” the primary operator responsible for intubating in the ICU. Factors influencing this variation included time of day, hospital policies, attending skill or preference, ICU census and acuity, and patient factors. There was an association between location of the training program, but not program size, and whether the PCCM fellow was the primary operator. Conclusion: There is significant variation in whether PCCM fellows are the primary operators to intubate medical ICU patients during training. Further work should explore how this variation affects fellow career development and competence in intubation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7959255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79592552021-03-15 Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Brady, Anna K. Brown, Wade Denson, Joshua L. Winter, Gretchen Niroula, Abesh Santhosh, Lekshmi Carlos, W. Graham ATS Sch Original Research Background: Endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a high-risk procedure. Competence in endotracheal intubation is a requirement for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) training programs, but fellow experience as the primary operator in intubating ICU patients has not been described on a large scale. Objective: We hypothesized that significant variation surrounding endotracheal intubation practices in medical ICUs exists in U.S. PCCM training programs. Methods: We administered a survey to a convenience sample of U.S. PCCM fellows to elicit typical intubation practices in the medical ICU. Results: Eighty-nine discrete U.S. PCCM and Internal Medicine Critical Care Medicine training programs (77% response rate) were represented. At 43% of programs, the PCCM fellow was “always or almost always” designated the primary operator for intubation of a medical ICU patient, whereas at 21% of programs, the PCCM fellow was “rarely or never” the primary operator responsible for intubating in the ICU. Factors influencing this variation included time of day, hospital policies, attending skill or preference, ICU census and acuity, and patient factors. There was an association between location of the training program, but not program size, and whether the PCCM fellow was the primary operator. Conclusion: There is significant variation in whether PCCM fellows are the primary operators to intubate medical ICU patients during training. Further work should explore how this variation affects fellow career development and competence in intubation. American Thoracic Society 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7959255/ /pubmed/33728421 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0004OC Text en Copyright © 2020 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). For commercial usage and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Original Research
Brady, Anna K.
Brown, Wade
Denson, Joshua L.
Winter, Gretchen
Niroula, Abesh
Santhosh, Lekshmi
Carlos, W. Graham
Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship
title Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship
title_full Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship
title_fullStr Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship
title_full_unstemmed Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship
title_short Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship
title_sort variation in intensive care unit intubation practices in pulmonary critical care medicine fellowship
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33728421
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0004OC
work_keys_str_mv AT bradyannak variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship
AT brownwade variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship
AT densonjoshual variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship
AT wintergretchen variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship
AT niroulaabesh variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship
AT santhoshlekshmi variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship
AT carloswgraham variationinintensivecareunitintubationpracticesinpulmonarycriticalcaremedicinefellowship