Cargando…

Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study

Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vollenberg, Richard, Matern, Philipp, Nowacki, Tobias, Fuhrmann, Valentin, Padberg, Jan-Sören, Ochs, Kevin, Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina, Strauß, Markus, Schmidt, Hartmut, Tepasse, Phil-Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051046
_version_ 1783664965261983744
author Vollenberg, Richard
Matern, Philipp
Nowacki, Tobias
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Padberg, Jan-Sören
Ochs, Kevin
Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina
Strauß, Markus
Schmidt, Hartmut
Tepasse, Phil-Robin
author_facet Vollenberg, Richard
Matern, Philipp
Nowacki, Tobias
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Padberg, Jan-Sören
Ochs, Kevin
Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina
Strauß, Markus
Schmidt, Hartmut
Tepasse, Phil-Robin
author_sort Vollenberg, Richard
collection PubMed
description Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to investigate the influence of the PP on the oxygenation and decarboxylation in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A prospective bicentric study design was used, and in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, PP was indicated from a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (P(aO2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (F(IO2)) ratio of <200. Patients were left prone for 16 h each. Pressure levels, F(IO2), were adjusted to ensure a P(aO2) greater than 60 mmHg. Blood gas analyses were performed before (baseline 0.5 h), during (1/2/5.5/9.5/13 h), and after being in the PP (1 h), the circulatory/ventilation parameters were continuously monitored, and lung compliance (LC) was roughly calculated. Responders were defined compared to the baseline value (P(aO2)/F(IO2) ratio increase of ≥15%; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(aCO2)) decrease of ≥2%). Results: 13 patients were included and 36 PP sessions were conducted. Overall, P(aO2)/F(IO2) increased significantly in the PP (p < 0.001). Most P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (29/36 PP sessions, 77%) were identified 9.5 h after turning prone (14% slow responders), while most P(aCO2) responders (15/36 PP sessions, 42%) were identified 13 h after turning prone. A subgroup of patients (interval intubation to PP ≥3 days) showed less P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (16% vs. 77%). An increase in P(aCO2) and minute ventilation in the PP showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001). LC (median before the PP = 38 mL/cm H(2)O; two patients with LC >80 mL/cm H(2)O) showed a significant positive correlation with the 28 day survival of patients (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The PP significantly improves oxygenation in COVID-19 ARDS patients. The data suggest that they also benefit most from an early PP. A decrease in minute ventilation may result in fewer P(aCO2) responders. LC may be a predictive outcome parameter in COVID-19 patients. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7959453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79594532021-03-16 Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study Vollenberg, Richard Matern, Philipp Nowacki, Tobias Fuhrmann, Valentin Padberg, Jan-Sören Ochs, Kevin Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina Strauß, Markus Schmidt, Hartmut Tepasse, Phil-Robin J Clin Med Article Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to investigate the influence of the PP on the oxygenation and decarboxylation in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A prospective bicentric study design was used, and in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, PP was indicated from a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (P(aO2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (F(IO2)) ratio of <200. Patients were left prone for 16 h each. Pressure levels, F(IO2), were adjusted to ensure a P(aO2) greater than 60 mmHg. Blood gas analyses were performed before (baseline 0.5 h), during (1/2/5.5/9.5/13 h), and after being in the PP (1 h), the circulatory/ventilation parameters were continuously monitored, and lung compliance (LC) was roughly calculated. Responders were defined compared to the baseline value (P(aO2)/F(IO2) ratio increase of ≥15%; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(aCO2)) decrease of ≥2%). Results: 13 patients were included and 36 PP sessions were conducted. Overall, P(aO2)/F(IO2) increased significantly in the PP (p < 0.001). Most P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (29/36 PP sessions, 77%) were identified 9.5 h after turning prone (14% slow responders), while most P(aCO2) responders (15/36 PP sessions, 42%) were identified 13 h after turning prone. A subgroup of patients (interval intubation to PP ≥3 days) showed less P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (16% vs. 77%). An increase in P(aCO2) and minute ventilation in the PP showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001). LC (median before the PP = 38 mL/cm H(2)O; two patients with LC >80 mL/cm H(2)O) showed a significant positive correlation with the 28 day survival of patients (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The PP significantly improves oxygenation in COVID-19 ARDS patients. The data suggest that they also benefit most from an early PP. A decrease in minute ventilation may result in fewer P(aCO2) responders. LC may be a predictive outcome parameter in COVID-19 patients. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. MDPI 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7959453/ /pubmed/33802479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051046 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vollenberg, Richard
Matern, Philipp
Nowacki, Tobias
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Padberg, Jan-Sören
Ochs, Kevin
Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina
Strauß, Markus
Schmidt, Hartmut
Tepasse, Phil-Robin
Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
title Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
title_full Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
title_short Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
title_sort prone position in mechanically ventilated covid-19 patients: a multicenter study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051046
work_keys_str_mv AT vollenbergrichard pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT maternphilipp pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT nowackitobias pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT fuhrmannvalentin pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT padbergjansoren pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT ochskevin pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT schuttenutgenkatharina pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT straußmarkus pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT schmidthartmut pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy
AT tepassephilrobin pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy