Cargando…
Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study
Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to inve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051046 |
_version_ | 1783664965261983744 |
---|---|
author | Vollenberg, Richard Matern, Philipp Nowacki, Tobias Fuhrmann, Valentin Padberg, Jan-Sören Ochs, Kevin Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina Strauß, Markus Schmidt, Hartmut Tepasse, Phil-Robin |
author_facet | Vollenberg, Richard Matern, Philipp Nowacki, Tobias Fuhrmann, Valentin Padberg, Jan-Sören Ochs, Kevin Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina Strauß, Markus Schmidt, Hartmut Tepasse, Phil-Robin |
author_sort | Vollenberg, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to investigate the influence of the PP on the oxygenation and decarboxylation in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A prospective bicentric study design was used, and in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, PP was indicated from a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (P(aO2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (F(IO2)) ratio of <200. Patients were left prone for 16 h each. Pressure levels, F(IO2), were adjusted to ensure a P(aO2) greater than 60 mmHg. Blood gas analyses were performed before (baseline 0.5 h), during (1/2/5.5/9.5/13 h), and after being in the PP (1 h), the circulatory/ventilation parameters were continuously monitored, and lung compliance (LC) was roughly calculated. Responders were defined compared to the baseline value (P(aO2)/F(IO2) ratio increase of ≥15%; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(aCO2)) decrease of ≥2%). Results: 13 patients were included and 36 PP sessions were conducted. Overall, P(aO2)/F(IO2) increased significantly in the PP (p < 0.001). Most P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (29/36 PP sessions, 77%) were identified 9.5 h after turning prone (14% slow responders), while most P(aCO2) responders (15/36 PP sessions, 42%) were identified 13 h after turning prone. A subgroup of patients (interval intubation to PP ≥3 days) showed less P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (16% vs. 77%). An increase in P(aCO2) and minute ventilation in the PP showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001). LC (median before the PP = 38 mL/cm H(2)O; two patients with LC >80 mL/cm H(2)O) showed a significant positive correlation with the 28 day survival of patients (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The PP significantly improves oxygenation in COVID-19 ARDS patients. The data suggest that they also benefit most from an early PP. A decrease in minute ventilation may result in fewer P(aCO2) responders. LC may be a predictive outcome parameter in COVID-19 patients. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7959453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79594532021-03-16 Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study Vollenberg, Richard Matern, Philipp Nowacki, Tobias Fuhrmann, Valentin Padberg, Jan-Sören Ochs, Kevin Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina Strauß, Markus Schmidt, Hartmut Tepasse, Phil-Robin J Clin Med Article Background: The prone position (PP) is increasingly used in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, studies investigating the influence of the PP are currently lacking in these patients. This is the first study to investigate the influence of the PP on the oxygenation and decarboxylation in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A prospective bicentric study design was used, and in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, PP was indicated from a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (P(aO2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (F(IO2)) ratio of <200. Patients were left prone for 16 h each. Pressure levels, F(IO2), were adjusted to ensure a P(aO2) greater than 60 mmHg. Blood gas analyses were performed before (baseline 0.5 h), during (1/2/5.5/9.5/13 h), and after being in the PP (1 h), the circulatory/ventilation parameters were continuously monitored, and lung compliance (LC) was roughly calculated. Responders were defined compared to the baseline value (P(aO2)/F(IO2) ratio increase of ≥15%; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(aCO2)) decrease of ≥2%). Results: 13 patients were included and 36 PP sessions were conducted. Overall, P(aO2)/F(IO2) increased significantly in the PP (p < 0.001). Most P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (29/36 PP sessions, 77%) were identified 9.5 h after turning prone (14% slow responders), while most P(aCO2) responders (15/36 PP sessions, 42%) were identified 13 h after turning prone. A subgroup of patients (interval intubation to PP ≥3 days) showed less P(aO2)/F(IO2) responders (16% vs. 77%). An increase in P(aCO2) and minute ventilation in the PP showed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001). LC (median before the PP = 38 mL/cm H(2)O; two patients with LC >80 mL/cm H(2)O) showed a significant positive correlation with the 28 day survival of patients (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The PP significantly improves oxygenation in COVID-19 ARDS patients. The data suggest that they also benefit most from an early PP. A decrease in minute ventilation may result in fewer P(aCO2) responders. LC may be a predictive outcome parameter in COVID-19 patients. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. MDPI 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7959453/ /pubmed/33802479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051046 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vollenberg, Richard Matern, Philipp Nowacki, Tobias Fuhrmann, Valentin Padberg, Jan-Sören Ochs, Kevin Schütte-Nütgen, Katharina Strauß, Markus Schmidt, Hartmut Tepasse, Phil-Robin Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study |
title | Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study |
title_full | Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study |
title_fullStr | Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study |
title_short | Prone Position in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study |
title_sort | prone position in mechanically ventilated covid-19 patients: a multicenter study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vollenbergrichard pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT maternphilipp pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT nowackitobias pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT fuhrmannvalentin pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT padbergjansoren pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT ochskevin pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT schuttenutgenkatharina pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT straußmarkus pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT schmidthartmut pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy AT tepassephilrobin pronepositioninmechanicallyventilatedcovid19patientsamulticenterstudy |