Cargando…
Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced that maritime transport share by 2.89% in global greenhouse gases. Electric propulsion system appears as a promising option for reducing ship emissions, especially for high-powered vessels. The aim of the current paper is to investigate the env...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13271-4 |
_version_ | 1783664982321266688 |
---|---|
author | Ammar, Nader R. Seddiek, Ibrahim S. |
author_facet | Ammar, Nader R. Seddiek, Ibrahim S. |
author_sort | Ammar, Nader R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced that maritime transport share by 2.89% in global greenhouse gases. Electric propulsion system appears as a promising option for reducing ship emissions, especially for high-powered vessels. The aim of the current paper is to investigate the environmental and economic impact of using electric propulsion systems. Simple eco-environmental model was presented to assess the best propulsion system for passenger ships. A comparison between diesel electric (DE) and combined gas turbine electric and steam (COGES) propulsion systems is conducted. As a case study, one of the cruise ships is selected. The results showed specific environmental benefits of COGES over DE propulsion option. From the design and operational viewpoints, COGES propulsion system is more energy efficient than DE by 9.3% and 27.55%, respectively. Economically, the values of the life cycle costs are 5,013 and 6,042 $/kW for DE and COGES systems, respectively. Finally, COGES seems as a greener option with a life-cycle cost-effectiveness of 612, 1970, and 6 $/ton for NO(x), SO(x), and CO(2) emissions, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7959586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79595862021-03-16 Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel Ammar, Nader R. Seddiek, Ibrahim S. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article The International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced that maritime transport share by 2.89% in global greenhouse gases. Electric propulsion system appears as a promising option for reducing ship emissions, especially for high-powered vessels. The aim of the current paper is to investigate the environmental and economic impact of using electric propulsion systems. Simple eco-environmental model was presented to assess the best propulsion system for passenger ships. A comparison between diesel electric (DE) and combined gas turbine electric and steam (COGES) propulsion systems is conducted. As a case study, one of the cruise ships is selected. The results showed specific environmental benefits of COGES over DE propulsion option. From the design and operational viewpoints, COGES propulsion system is more energy efficient than DE by 9.3% and 27.55%, respectively. Economically, the values of the life cycle costs are 5,013 and 6,042 $/kW for DE and COGES systems, respectively. Finally, COGES seems as a greener option with a life-cycle cost-effectiveness of 612, 1970, and 6 $/ton for NO(x), SO(x), and CO(2) emissions, respectively. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7959586/ /pubmed/33723780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13271-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ammar, Nader R. Seddiek, Ibrahim S. Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
title | Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
title_full | Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
title_short | Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
title_sort | evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13271-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ammarnaderr evaluationoftheenvironmentalandeconomicimpactsofelectricpropulsionsystemsonboardshipscasestudypassengervessel AT seddiekibrahims evaluationoftheenvironmentalandeconomicimpactsofelectricpropulsionsystemsonboardshipscasestudypassengervessel |