Cargando…

Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography applied to the primary motor cortex provides two parameters for cortical excitability: motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of systematic coil shifts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roos, Daniela, Biermann, Lea, Jarczok, Tomasz A., Bender, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.623692
_version_ 1783665013752332288
author Roos, Daniela
Biermann, Lea
Jarczok, Tomasz A.
Bender, Stephan
author_facet Roos, Daniela
Biermann, Lea
Jarczok, Tomasz A.
Bender, Stephan
author_sort Roos, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography applied to the primary motor cortex provides two parameters for cortical excitability: motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of systematic coil shifts on both the TEP N100 component and MEPs in addition to the relationship between both parameters. In 12 healthy adults, the center of a standardized grid was fixed above the hot spot of the target muscle of the left primary motor cortex. Twelve additional positions were arranged in a quadratic grid with positions between 5 and 10 mm from the hot spot. At each of the 13 positions, TMS single pulses were applied. The topographical maximum of the resulting N100 was located ipsilateral and slightly posterior to the stimulation site. A source analysis revealed an equivalent dipole localized more deeply than standard motor cortex coordinates that could not be explained by a single seeded primary motor cortex dipole. The N100 topography might not only reflect primary motor cortex activation, but also sum activation of the surrounding cortex. N100 amplitude and latency decreased significantly during stimulation anterior-medial to the hot spot although MEP amplitudes were smaller at all other stimulation sites. Therefore, N100 amplitudes might be suitable for detecting differences in local cortical excitability. The N100 topography, with its maximum located posterior to the stimulation site, possibly depends on both anatomical characteristics of the stimulated cortex and differences in local excitability of surrounding cortical areas. The less excitable anterior cortex might contribute to a more posterior maximum. There was no correlation between N100 and MEP amplitudes, but a single-trial analysis revealed a trend toward larger N100 amplitudes in trials with larger MEPs. Thus, functionally efficient cortical excitation might increase the probability of higher N100 amplitudes, but TEPs are also generated in the absence of MEPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7959732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79597322021-03-16 Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component Roos, Daniela Biermann, Lea Jarczok, Tomasz A. Bender, Stephan Front Neurosci Neuroscience Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography applied to the primary motor cortex provides two parameters for cortical excitability: motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of systematic coil shifts on both the TEP N100 component and MEPs in addition to the relationship between both parameters. In 12 healthy adults, the center of a standardized grid was fixed above the hot spot of the target muscle of the left primary motor cortex. Twelve additional positions were arranged in a quadratic grid with positions between 5 and 10 mm from the hot spot. At each of the 13 positions, TMS single pulses were applied. The topographical maximum of the resulting N100 was located ipsilateral and slightly posterior to the stimulation site. A source analysis revealed an equivalent dipole localized more deeply than standard motor cortex coordinates that could not be explained by a single seeded primary motor cortex dipole. The N100 topography might not only reflect primary motor cortex activation, but also sum activation of the surrounding cortex. N100 amplitude and latency decreased significantly during stimulation anterior-medial to the hot spot although MEP amplitudes were smaller at all other stimulation sites. Therefore, N100 amplitudes might be suitable for detecting differences in local cortical excitability. The N100 topography, with its maximum located posterior to the stimulation site, possibly depends on both anatomical characteristics of the stimulated cortex and differences in local excitability of surrounding cortical areas. The less excitable anterior cortex might contribute to a more posterior maximum. There was no correlation between N100 and MEP amplitudes, but a single-trial analysis revealed a trend toward larger N100 amplitudes in trials with larger MEPs. Thus, functionally efficient cortical excitation might increase the probability of higher N100 amplitudes, but TEPs are also generated in the absence of MEPs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7959732/ /pubmed/33732105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.623692 Text en Copyright © 2021 Roos, Biermann, Jarczok and Bender. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Roos, Daniela
Biermann, Lea
Jarczok, Tomasz A.
Bender, Stephan
Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component
title Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component
title_full Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component
title_fullStr Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component
title_full_unstemmed Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component
title_short Local Differences in Cortical Excitability – A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component
title_sort local differences in cortical excitability – a systematic mapping study of the tms-evoked n100 component
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.623692
work_keys_str_mv AT roosdaniela localdifferencesincorticalexcitabilityasystematicmappingstudyofthetmsevokedn100component
AT biermannlea localdifferencesincorticalexcitabilityasystematicmappingstudyofthetmsevokedn100component
AT jarczoktomasza localdifferencesincorticalexcitabilityasystematicmappingstudyofthetmsevokedn100component
AT benderstephan localdifferencesincorticalexcitabilityasystematicmappingstudyofthetmsevokedn100component