Cargando…

Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Bone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) that include bisphosphonates (BPAs) and denosumab help in decreasing and delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with metastatic breast canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raghu Subramanian, Charumathi, Talluri, Swapna, Mullangi, Sanjana, Lekkala, Manidhar R, Moftakhar, Bahar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738175
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13332
_version_ 1783665052458418176
author Raghu Subramanian, Charumathi
Talluri, Swapna
Mullangi, Sanjana
Lekkala, Manidhar R
Moftakhar, Bahar
author_facet Raghu Subramanian, Charumathi
Talluri, Swapna
Mullangi, Sanjana
Lekkala, Manidhar R
Moftakhar, Bahar
author_sort Raghu Subramanian, Charumathi
collection PubMed
description Bone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) that include bisphosphonates (BPAs) and denosumab help in decreasing and delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with metastatic breast cancer. BPAs approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bone metastases (BM) in the United States are pamidronate and zolendronic acid, while clodronate and ibandronate are licensed for use in other countries. Current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every four weeks, or zolendronic acid 4 mg every four weeks or every 12 weeks, or intravenous pamidronate 90 mg every four weeks. Current guidelines do not recommend one BMA over another, however, zolendronic acid and denosumab were the most commonly used BMAs in population-based studies. Side effects of BMAs include acute phase reactions, hypocalcemia, nephrotoxicity, osteonecrosis of jaw, etc. While other side effects are common with both BPAs and denosumab, the latter has less nephrotoxic potential and is preferred for use in patients with renal failure. Current ASCO guidelines recommend continuing BMAs indefinitely, however, in clinical practice, this decision needs to be individualized, especially since there is no data on the impact of long-term use of BMAs. Further studies would need to be developed to develop an algorithm of SRE risk assessment and to determine which patients would benefit from BMAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7960030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79600302021-03-17 Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer Raghu Subramanian, Charumathi Talluri, Swapna Mullangi, Sanjana Lekkala, Manidhar R Moftakhar, Bahar Cureus Oncology Bone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) that include bisphosphonates (BPAs) and denosumab help in decreasing and delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with metastatic breast cancer. BPAs approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bone metastases (BM) in the United States are pamidronate and zolendronic acid, while clodronate and ibandronate are licensed for use in other countries. Current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every four weeks, or zolendronic acid 4 mg every four weeks or every 12 weeks, or intravenous pamidronate 90 mg every four weeks. Current guidelines do not recommend one BMA over another, however, zolendronic acid and denosumab were the most commonly used BMAs in population-based studies. Side effects of BMAs include acute phase reactions, hypocalcemia, nephrotoxicity, osteonecrosis of jaw, etc. While other side effects are common with both BPAs and denosumab, the latter has less nephrotoxic potential and is preferred for use in patients with renal failure. Current ASCO guidelines recommend continuing BMAs indefinitely, however, in clinical practice, this decision needs to be individualized, especially since there is no data on the impact of long-term use of BMAs. Further studies would need to be developed to develop an algorithm of SRE risk assessment and to determine which patients would benefit from BMAs. Cureus 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7960030/ /pubmed/33738175 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13332 Text en Copyright © 2021, Raghu Subramanian et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Raghu Subramanian, Charumathi
Talluri, Swapna
Mullangi, Sanjana
Lekkala, Manidhar R
Moftakhar, Bahar
Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
title Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_full Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_short Review of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_sort review of bone modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738175
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13332
work_keys_str_mv AT raghusubramaniancharumathi reviewofbonemodifyingagentsinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT talluriswapna reviewofbonemodifyingagentsinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT mullangisanjana reviewofbonemodifyingagentsinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT lekkalamanidharr reviewofbonemodifyingagentsinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT moftakharbahar reviewofbonemodifyingagentsinmetastaticbreastcancer