Cargando…
A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure
OBJECTIVES: Shenfu Injection (SFI) was widely used in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in China. A plethora of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) has been conducted in this research area, although with scattered results. The purpose of this overview was to conduct a comprehensive review t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816590 |
_version_ | 1783665061336711168 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Jinke Wang, Yanlu Huang, Suihe Qin, Xiaohui Yan, Fang Shen, Min Huang, Yong |
author_facet | Huang, Jinke Wang, Yanlu Huang, Suihe Qin, Xiaohui Yan, Fang Shen, Min Huang, Yong |
author_sort | Huang, Jinke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Shenfu Injection (SFI) was widely used in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in China. A plethora of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) has been conducted in this research area, although with scattered results. The purpose of this overview was to conduct a comprehensive review to summarize and critically evaluate the existing evidence. METHODS: Digital databases were searched for SRs/MAs up to January 28, 2021. Two authors independently screened the reviews and assessed the methodological quality of included SRs/MAs using Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2). Quality of evidence for outcomes evaluated within the reviews was appraised with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Thirteen SRs/MAs met the inclusion criteria. Based on AMSTAR-2, the quality of all SRs/MAs was critically low, because all of them have more than one critical domains that were unmet. Based on GRADE, the evidence quality of 24 outcome measures was low or very low, 27 outcome measures was moderate, and none outcome measure was high. Descriptive analysis showed that SFI was an effective and safe method for HF. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SFI for the treatment of HF may be clinically effective and safe. However, this conclusion must be interpreted cautiously due to the generally low methodological quality and low evidence quality of the included SRs/MAs. More rigorously designed SRs/MAs and RCTs with high methodological quality are necessary for further proof. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7960068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79600682021-03-25 A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure Huang, Jinke Wang, Yanlu Huang, Suihe Qin, Xiaohui Yan, Fang Shen, Min Huang, Yong Cardiovasc Ther Research Article OBJECTIVES: Shenfu Injection (SFI) was widely used in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in China. A plethora of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) has been conducted in this research area, although with scattered results. The purpose of this overview was to conduct a comprehensive review to summarize and critically evaluate the existing evidence. METHODS: Digital databases were searched for SRs/MAs up to January 28, 2021. Two authors independently screened the reviews and assessed the methodological quality of included SRs/MAs using Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2). Quality of evidence for outcomes evaluated within the reviews was appraised with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Thirteen SRs/MAs met the inclusion criteria. Based on AMSTAR-2, the quality of all SRs/MAs was critically low, because all of them have more than one critical domains that were unmet. Based on GRADE, the evidence quality of 24 outcome measures was low or very low, 27 outcome measures was moderate, and none outcome measure was high. Descriptive analysis showed that SFI was an effective and safe method for HF. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SFI for the treatment of HF may be clinically effective and safe. However, this conclusion must be interpreted cautiously due to the generally low methodological quality and low evidence quality of the included SRs/MAs. More rigorously designed SRs/MAs and RCTs with high methodological quality are necessary for further proof. Hindawi 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7960068/ /pubmed/33777184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816590 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jinke Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Jinke Wang, Yanlu Huang, Suihe Qin, Xiaohui Yan, Fang Shen, Min Huang, Yong A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure |
title | A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure |
title_full | A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure |
title_fullStr | A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure |
title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure |
title_short | A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure |
title_sort | critical overview of systematic reviews of shenfu injection for heart failure |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjinke acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT wangyanlu acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT huangsuihe acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT qinxiaohui acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT yanfang acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT shenmin acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT huangyong acriticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT huangjinke criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT wangyanlu criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT huangsuihe criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT qinxiaohui criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT yanfang criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT shenmin criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure AT huangyong criticaloverviewofsystematicreviewsofshenfuinjectionforheartfailure |