Cargando…
Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction
BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has evolved dramatically over the last 10 years and has become a speciality in its own right. Usually surgery is carried out by a General Surgeon, sometimes alone and sometimes in combination with a Plastic Surgeon. Patients frequently have mu...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.11.012 |
_version_ | 1783665067318837248 |
---|---|
author | Saour, S. Floyd, D. |
author_facet | Saour, S. Floyd, D. |
author_sort | Saour, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has evolved dramatically over the last 10 years and has become a speciality in its own right. Usually surgery is carried out by a General Surgeon, sometimes alone and sometimes in combination with a Plastic Surgeon. Patients frequently have multiple incisions over the abdomen, soft tissue excess and skin redundancy and planning the incisions to allow for a comprehensive abdominal wall reconstruction can be a challenge. In order to help simplify incision planning we examined our personal series of 150 cases to formulate a classification system for the incision and provide a simple algorithm. METHODS: Over an 8 year period from 2007 to 2015, 150 patients underwent complex abdominal wall reconstruction, patient demographics, outcome and complications were recorded. Preoperative photographs of the planned incisions were reviewed by the senior author and classified into 4 groups. RESULTS: All patients fell into one of four groups. Type 1, using existing incisions (28%). Type 2, using an abdominoplasty approach (26%). Type 3, a fleur-de-lys approach (43%). Type 4, a free style group where the incisions are so complex that the above three categories are not suitable (3%). CONCLUSION: Soft tissue management in CAWR can be challenging with the primary objective to achieve uncomplicated primary wound healing while optimising the aesthetic outcome. We present a simple classification system and associated algorithm, which can help surgical planning and identify cases that may benefit from a joint procedure with a Plastic Surgeon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7960495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79604952021-03-19 Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction Saour, S. Floyd, D. JPRAS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has evolved dramatically over the last 10 years and has become a speciality in its own right. Usually surgery is carried out by a General Surgeon, sometimes alone and sometimes in combination with a Plastic Surgeon. Patients frequently have multiple incisions over the abdomen, soft tissue excess and skin redundancy and planning the incisions to allow for a comprehensive abdominal wall reconstruction can be a challenge. In order to help simplify incision planning we examined our personal series of 150 cases to formulate a classification system for the incision and provide a simple algorithm. METHODS: Over an 8 year period from 2007 to 2015, 150 patients underwent complex abdominal wall reconstruction, patient demographics, outcome and complications were recorded. Preoperative photographs of the planned incisions were reviewed by the senior author and classified into 4 groups. RESULTS: All patients fell into one of four groups. Type 1, using existing incisions (28%). Type 2, using an abdominoplasty approach (26%). Type 3, a fleur-de-lys approach (43%). Type 4, a free style group where the incisions are so complex that the above three categories are not suitable (3%). CONCLUSION: Soft tissue management in CAWR can be challenging with the primary objective to achieve uncomplicated primary wound healing while optimising the aesthetic outcome. We present a simple classification system and associated algorithm, which can help surgical planning and identify cases that may benefit from a joint procedure with a Plastic Surgeon. Elsevier 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7960495/ /pubmed/33748385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.11.012 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Saour, S. Floyd, D. Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
title | Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
title_full | Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
title_short | Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
title_sort | incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.11.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saours incisionplanningincomplexabdominalwallreconstruction AT floydd incisionplanningincomplexabdominalwallreconstruction |