Cargando…

Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives

BACKGROUND: The recently announced long-term plan for the NHS is based on a model of person-centred care, which relies on the sustained engagement of patients, shared decision making, and capability for self-management. For a primary care service under increasing pressure from an ageing and chronica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Litchfield, Ian, Greenfield, Sheila, Turner, Grace M, Finnikin, Samuel, Calvert, Melanie J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101135
_version_ 1783665074264604672
author Litchfield, Ian
Greenfield, Sheila
Turner, Grace M
Finnikin, Samuel
Calvert, Melanie J
author_facet Litchfield, Ian
Greenfield, Sheila
Turner, Grace M
Finnikin, Samuel
Calvert, Melanie J
author_sort Litchfield, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recently announced long-term plan for the NHS is based on a model of person-centred care, which relies on the sustained engagement of patients, shared decision making, and capability for self-management. For a primary care service under increasing pressure from an ageing and chronically ill population, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) appear capable of supporting many of the requirements for person-centred care, yet little is known of the circumstances of their current implementation or how their use might be optimised. AIM: To begin the conversation about how successfully PROMs have been integrated into primary care and how their use might be supported. DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative investigation of the perspectives of GPs exploring the use of PROMs as part of routine clinical care in England. METHOD: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with GPs from across England. The data were analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: A total of 25 interviews were conducted and GPs described the potential benefit of PROMs in a range of circumstances, but also voiced concerns about their reliability and their potential to constrain consultations. Their flexibility meant they had the potential to be incorporated into existing care processes but only with the requisite logistical support. CONCLUSION: Areas that need to be addressed include the creation of a compelling body of evidence of the benefit of PROMs, appropriate training for staff and patients, and a coherent implementation strategy from policymakers and funding bodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7960526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79605262021-03-17 Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives Litchfield, Ian Greenfield, Sheila Turner, Grace M Finnikin, Samuel Calvert, Melanie J BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The recently announced long-term plan for the NHS is based on a model of person-centred care, which relies on the sustained engagement of patients, shared decision making, and capability for self-management. For a primary care service under increasing pressure from an ageing and chronically ill population, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) appear capable of supporting many of the requirements for person-centred care, yet little is known of the circumstances of their current implementation or how their use might be optimised. AIM: To begin the conversation about how successfully PROMs have been integrated into primary care and how their use might be supported. DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative investigation of the perspectives of GPs exploring the use of PROMs as part of routine clinical care in England. METHOD: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with GPs from across England. The data were analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: A total of 25 interviews were conducted and GPs described the potential benefit of PROMs in a range of circumstances, but also voiced concerns about their reliability and their potential to constrain consultations. Their flexibility meant they had the potential to be incorporated into existing care processes but only with the requisite logistical support. CONCLUSION: Areas that need to be addressed include the creation of a compelling body of evidence of the benefit of PROMs, appropriate training for staff and patients, and a coherent implementation strategy from policymakers and funding bodies. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7960526/ /pubmed/33199306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101135 Text en Copyright © 2020, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Litchfield, Ian
Greenfield, Sheila
Turner, Grace M
Finnikin, Samuel
Calvert, Melanie J
Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
title Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
title_full Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
title_fullStr Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
title_short Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
title_sort implementing proms in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of gp perspectives
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101135
work_keys_str_mv AT litchfieldian implementingpromsinroutineclinicalcareaqualitativeexplorationofgpperspectives
AT greenfieldsheila implementingpromsinroutineclinicalcareaqualitativeexplorationofgpperspectives
AT turnergracem implementingpromsinroutineclinicalcareaqualitativeexplorationofgpperspectives
AT finnikinsamuel implementingpromsinroutineclinicalcareaqualitativeexplorationofgpperspectives
AT calvertmelaniej implementingpromsinroutineclinicalcareaqualitativeexplorationofgpperspectives