Cargando…

Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to utilize the Manchester scar scale (MSS) and ultrasound in investigating the association between uterine wall defects and cutaneous scar characteristics after cesarean section (CS). METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. The degree of myometrial loss was qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Naimi, Ammar, Mouzakiti, Niki, Eißmann, Carmen, Louwen, Frank, Bahlmann, Franz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33415438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2
_version_ 1783665081296355328
author Al Naimi, Ammar
Mouzakiti, Niki
Eißmann, Carmen
Louwen, Frank
Bahlmann, Franz
author_facet Al Naimi, Ammar
Mouzakiti, Niki
Eißmann, Carmen
Louwen, Frank
Bahlmann, Franz
author_sort Al Naimi, Ammar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to utilize the Manchester scar scale (MSS) and ultrasound in investigating the association between uterine wall defects and cutaneous scar characteristics after cesarean section (CS). METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. The degree of myometrial loss was quantified by calculating a residual myometrial thickness (RMT) ratio as a percentage of RMT to the pre-cesarean anterior uterine wall thickness. Cutaneous scar assessment was performed according to the MSS. Spearman’s correlation and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a cut-off value of p < 0.05 were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred forty seven women, of which 2.4% had an Asian, 3.6% an Afro-American, 82% a Caucasian and 12% a Mediterranean background, were recruited. The RMT ratio ranged between 11.9 and 100% with a median of 55.8% and an average of 56%. MSS scores ranged from 4 to 13 with a median of 5 and an average of 6. Spearman’s correlation between MSS and RMT ratio show a rho of − 0.01 with a p value of 0.8. The correlation between MSS and RMT ratio within the four ethnical groups showed a p value between 0.3 and 0.8 and a rho between 0.8 and − 0.8. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed an eta(2) of 0.13 and a p value of 0.0002 for the effect of ethnicity on MSS and an eta(2) of 0.009 and a p value of 0.68 for the effect of ethnicity on the RMT ratio. CONCLUSION: CS laparotomy scars heal differently between ethnical groups, but generally with satisfying results. Ethnicity does not affect myometrial healing and scar appearance does not reflect myometrial healing after CS. Thus, separate uterine sonographic assessment is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7960579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79605792021-04-01 Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness? Al Naimi, Ammar Mouzakiti, Niki Eißmann, Carmen Louwen, Frank Bahlmann, Franz Arch Gynecol Obstet Images in Obstetrics and Gynecology PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to utilize the Manchester scar scale (MSS) and ultrasound in investigating the association between uterine wall defects and cutaneous scar characteristics after cesarean section (CS). METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. The degree of myometrial loss was quantified by calculating a residual myometrial thickness (RMT) ratio as a percentage of RMT to the pre-cesarean anterior uterine wall thickness. Cutaneous scar assessment was performed according to the MSS. Spearman’s correlation and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a cut-off value of p < 0.05 were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred forty seven women, of which 2.4% had an Asian, 3.6% an Afro-American, 82% a Caucasian and 12% a Mediterranean background, were recruited. The RMT ratio ranged between 11.9 and 100% with a median of 55.8% and an average of 56%. MSS scores ranged from 4 to 13 with a median of 5 and an average of 6. Spearman’s correlation between MSS and RMT ratio show a rho of − 0.01 with a p value of 0.8. The correlation between MSS and RMT ratio within the four ethnical groups showed a p value between 0.3 and 0.8 and a rho between 0.8 and − 0.8. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed an eta(2) of 0.13 and a p value of 0.0002 for the effect of ethnicity on MSS and an eta(2) of 0.009 and a p value of 0.68 for the effect of ethnicity on the RMT ratio. CONCLUSION: CS laparotomy scars heal differently between ethnical groups, but generally with satisfying results. Ethnicity does not affect myometrial healing and scar appearance does not reflect myometrial healing after CS. Thus, separate uterine sonographic assessment is recommended. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7960579/ /pubmed/33415438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Images in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Al Naimi, Ammar
Mouzakiti, Niki
Eißmann, Carmen
Louwen, Frank
Bahlmann, Franz
Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
title Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
title_full Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
title_fullStr Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
title_full_unstemmed Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
title_short Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
title_sort does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
topic Images in Obstetrics and Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33415438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alnaimiammar doestheappearanceofthecutaneousscaraftercesareansectionreflecttheresidualmyometrialthickness
AT mouzakitiniki doestheappearanceofthecutaneousscaraftercesareansectionreflecttheresidualmyometrialthickness
AT eißmanncarmen doestheappearanceofthecutaneousscaraftercesareansectionreflecttheresidualmyometrialthickness
AT louwenfrank doestheappearanceofthecutaneousscaraftercesareansectionreflecttheresidualmyometrialthickness
AT bahlmannfranz doestheappearanceofthecutaneousscaraftercesareansectionreflecttheresidualmyometrialthickness